[SPOILERS] Tyrael = GIGANTIC Plothole?
#21
Posted 21 May 2012 - 11:30 PM
#22
Posted 23 May 2012 - 06:12 AM
Were he actually Nephalem, it would have been clearly stated as such. In fact, he is still referred to as an angel several times and when you reach heaven Imperius referrers to YOU as nephalem, and separates Tyrael from these statements.
#23
Posted 25 May 2012 - 03:36 AM
SnowBro191, on 13 May 2012 - 12:43 AM, said:
You sure? There doesn't actually seem to be anything inside those hoods and armour...
#24
Posted 25 May 2012 - 03:39 AM
Eid_ot_emit, on 23 May 2012 - 06:12 AM, said:
Also, presumably if he were Nephalem he would also have no "fate" as Ithereal says and would be free to kill Diablo himself.
#25
Posted 27 May 2012 - 02:25 PM
From what I can gather and speculate, before when he wou;ld "die" he would eventually reform and reemerge fromt he Crystal Arch. With the removal of his wings, he separated his spirit (for lack of a better descriptor) fromt he CA and made it so that if he dies now, he will not reform and reemerge, thus rendering him mortal.
It seems like a pretty big deal that Justice, and now Wisdom, may be lost to the Heavens should he die. Pretty big risks to take. Will there be a new aspect of Justice? Does this new aspect come when Tyrael dies, or did he start to form the moment Tyrael separated himself fromt eh CA? How did Tyrael become the aspect of Wisdom (and I mean more so beyond the fact that when you look at it, he wasn't very wise at all)? They make it pretty clear that the archangles are really physical representations of what they represent, and in some way affect that concepts ability to exist and be felt (particularly by other angels). So how then could could Tyrael completely change what he was? It would make sense if at the end of the game instead of staying mortal, he had to become re-attuned to the CA to join the Council again, only this time he attuned to Wisdom rather than Justice; but instead we're left with what is him ostensibly just deciding to be Wisdom.
I find the entire Tyrael plot line to be the worst plot line, and biggest flaw, in Diablo 3. It isn't conceptually that abysmal, but its delivery is downright awful. I really hope these gaps in logic and story are explained and fleshed out in coming expansions. Doesn't have to be much, just some dialogue threads.
Edited by Eid_ot_emit, 27 May 2012 - 02:28 PM.
#26
Posted 06 June 2012 - 09:52 AM
#27
Posted 06 June 2012 - 10:36 AM
#28
Posted 06 June 2012 - 05:01 PM
Ranim, on 06 June 2012 - 09:52 AM, said:
Tyrael? You might want to watch those again, Marius (that guy) was balding and frail. Tyrael looks physically powerful, and his hands are probably the size of Marius' upper torso..
Eid_ot_emit, on 27 May 2012 - 02:25 PM, said:
It's my belief that the Tyrael plot line will indeed be a key part of the future story. Prophecy of the End of Days starts with 'And at the End of Days, Wisdom shall be lost as Justice falls upon the world of men.' In-game lore makes it sound like Malthael has been missing for quite some time, while the prophecy sounds like what goes down happens recently.
Just so happens that Tyrael becomes mortal, abandons his Justice aspect for no reason and takes up, you guessed it, the role of Wisdom. (Evil cannot be stopped, we must destroy the soulstone to do so! Oh, the Nephalem beat down Diablo? Hurrah, Justice has been served! Wait, who smashed the soulstone? No one? What do you mean 'it fell'? Who in the Burning Hells thought that was a good idea? Oh well.)
What kicks off the prophecy, which Deckard Cain says is a warning about 'the ultimate invasion of our world by the Hells'? Wisdom being lost, which now has a mortal as its aspect. The same mortal that gave up Justice without anyone, that we know of, replacing it, leaving it to 'the world of men' to mete out future Justice against the Hells.
#29
Posted 06 June 2012 - 11:02 PM
About him being Justice and dying, he could not be bound to ageing, so if he's not killed he would be mortal, but won't die of old age
Edited by Nacho_ijp, 06 June 2012 - 11:04 PM.

#30
Posted 19 June 2012 - 07:46 PM
okrane, on 13 May 2012 - 11:18 AM, said:
It's a franchise made for you to kill shit catering to the same kids that like Twilight, Harry Potter. You can get away with shit in order to make it feel "epic" and the player to feel "awesome and important". Whatever that means.
Your prejudices about teenagers and gaming adults makes you everything but "bright", I'm afraid...
And don't you dare mention neither Diablo nor Harry Potter in the same sentence as Twilight...
Edited by Tzalix, 19 June 2012 - 07:46 PM.
#31
Posted 01 August 2012 - 04:40 PM
Choda, on 13 May 2012 - 12:35 AM, said:
He never became human, he became mortal.
Mortal means he can die, nothing more. He is still an angel and, according to the closing cinematic, he remains mortal while he's back in heaven and he now stands as wisdom (instead of justice).
#32
Posted 01 August 2012 - 05:30 PM
Edited by Eldius, 01 August 2012 - 05:32 PM.
#33
Posted 05 September 2012 - 07:04 PM
#34
Posted 11 November 2012 - 04:07 AM
Diablo III Skill Proc Coefficients:
http://www.diablofans.com/topic/77837-skill-proc-coefficients-complete-list/
#35
Posted 12 November 2012 - 01:15 AM
Here is how I rationalize it and to me it makes perfect sense.
When 2 beings mate, what they create is not entirely new. The offspring is part of each of them. This would mean that there must be human qualities within angels AND demons.
Strip away the righteousness and good from angels, or the malevolence and evil from demons, and underneath there is something human within them both.
So when I look at offspring, I know that whatever made them resembles them in some way, at some level. It's not a stretch at all in my mind for him to look human (although if he was CALLED human I would have a slight problem with that).
#36
Posted 21 November 2012 - 06:27 PM
Eldius, on 01 August 2012 - 05:30 PM, said:
Exactly what you say bro. By shedding his angelic form (for the lack of a better word) he looses part of his angelic nature. His acts are both acts of wisdom and justice. On the one hand he cannot do nothing while the Nephalem are wronged for something they didn't do. On the other hand it was wise of him to act the way he did (reasons in the quote ^^).
@Glowyrm. Angels aren't made from intercourse but are born from the silver spire. It is the other way around. Humans have the quality of both, but angels aren't human.
And I personally love Tyreal's role in the plot !
#37
Posted 21 November 2012 - 06:35 PM
Pacotez, on 13 May 2012 - 03:58 AM, said:
a mortal archangel
not a human
he still have his powers
^ This
Capitano666, on 01 August 2012 - 04:40 PM, said:
Choda, on 13 May 2012 - 12:35 AM, said:
He never became human, he became mortal.
Mortal means he can die, nothing more. He is still an angel and, according to the closing cinematic, he remains mortal while he's back in heaven and he now stands as wisdom (instead of justice).
And This^
#38
Posted 21 November 2012 - 06:39 PM
#39
Posted 21 November 2012 - 06:39 PM
#40
Posted 21 November 2012 - 06:54 PM
maka, on 21 November 2012 - 06:39 PM, said:
I'd like to refer to Dogma to answer this one. If you haven't seen it, go watch it now. Great movie!!!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










