Can Diablo come back from the dead ?
Posted 20 February 2012 - 10:55 AM
The strong must rule if we are to survive.
Posted 20 February 2012 - 09:07 PM
Besides there cant really be a "Diablo" without the bad El'Diablos!
Posted 20 February 2012 - 09:09 PM
Posted 21 February 2012 - 05:32 AM
Since lesser evils don't have destroyed soul stones, their resurrections seem to make more sense to me.....wouuld love to fight duriel again..............he was rediculously hard on normal if you didn't know what you were doing.
fighting diablo, kinda feels like a been there done that kinda thing.
Posted 21 February 2012 - 06:20 AM
1. Diablo looks very different compare to its looks from D1 and D2.
- they look very similar in D1 and D2. But not D3. we can tell it's Diablo, but he looks way different. This can mean something has changed for Diablo himself.
2.Diablo used to be the one who came up with most schemes...
-As Mephisto said in Act 4 in D2, he is "wise diablo." he was the one who came up with most evil schemes throughout the D1 and D2, and no doubt he will in D3 too.
3.Even though the game name is Diablo, it could be boring to go against him again...
-So why not make it even epic to make it not boring, but with more thrill and excitement?(such as this time even stronger than ever!)
And I believe this time Diablo will rise with the Black Soulstone's power in his position!..with his evil plan.
Edited by ased28, 21 February 2012 - 06:22 AM.
Posted 25 February 2012 - 08:53 PM
Posted 28 February 2012 - 01:49 AM
Posted 28 February 2012 - 02:14 AM
Did something change here? It was my understanding that the soulstones were prisons, which is why Mephisto was not at full strength when we fought him (his vessel, the Que Hegan, had only the largest chunk of Mephisto's shattered stone, with the others going to the other council members)--he didn't have his entire soul. Shattering them was supposed to kill their very souls and not send them back to the Void, and I don't think anything was offered yet that contradicts that, unless someone can quote something directly and not just make a vague accusation. It has, admittedly, been a long time since I've played the game and I finished the books some time ago, so this is not exactly fresh on my mind.
All this leads to one of the more popular ideas behind Diablo's re-emergence in Diablo III, which is that since Leah was conceived by a human possessed by Diablo, an "accidental" (perhaps or perhaps not, since Adria was involved) human "soulstone" was created. So, Diablo was, theoretically, destroyed, but his essence lived through the shattering of the soulstones in baby Leah.
I don't believe this is the case. The Horadrim killed the physical bodies of the Prime Evils during the Black Exile and then used the soulstones to imprison their souls. If what you're saying is true, then there would be no need for the soulstones.
Edited by Sloth, 28 February 2012 - 02:17 AM.
Posted 28 February 2012 - 03:34 AM
Posted 28 February 2012 - 04:11 AM
Edited by Sloth, 28 February 2012 - 04:12 AM.
Posted 28 February 2012 - 01:32 PM
Posted 01 March 2012 - 09:11 PM
After all the game name is, Diablo and not "evil evil"
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users