DiabloFans

I think we need a mutual agreement system so it stops high level players from screwing with lowers. We also need to be able to almost set rules to a duel, like a button turn onablo or off, that decides if the fight is potable or not. Like, just a button you press, and if both players agree, the figt starts.

"Level ## NAMEHERE wants to duel, with potions (or without)" kindof a little alert system, and them theyre both hostile with eachother. Just a clicable button so noone can say no pots and cheat like a fuerer. And the thing to stop the pwnage from assholes with issues to take out on small people.

Hi guys,
I believe this is my 1st post on the forums and these are my points:

PK should still be allowed ( It's part of the game )
However there might be an option when you create the game that lets you allow pvp or not in your game.
There should be something to allow people to duel with a set of rules they can set, but the good old free-for-all/teams/no real rules pvp should still be an option in the game.

I believe that Diablo 2 pvp was excellent and you could even create your own rules when you were playing with people bright enough to respect them. This gives the player a lot of freedom and this is what we need in a RPG. However, set of rules and so should be available as an option....

Oh and... 1.13 please <3

Cya guys

Surely pvp will differ from D2, but when it starts becoming too formal with rules and shit... meh not so fun. Just some hostility and straight up fightin will work with me.

I agree with what's been previously suggested, a mutual hostile agreement, hostility allowance etc. Customizable pk games is what I feel d2 was lacking, straight up free-for- all d2 pk gets old, due to the whole 'godliest player takes all' kinda environment.

for all you lore ppl out there... say diablo were realistic as many of you want, you can be killed at anytime anyplace.... so pking=ok

the lvl restriction to duel at lvl 9 was ok, mabye bump it up to 10.

tele was pretty annoying, it needs to be everyone or noone, like it is now.

and make the duels last longer: ie dmg types (hero dmg type and hero armor (mabye even each class does more dmg to the other ie: barb armor takes more dmg vs monk dmg)), block reductions vs players, more health, or less dmg in PvP.

Thats because your one of the people who likes to kill people any time for any reason. Thats ridiculous and impunes gameplaay for other people, and takes away from them being able to enjoy the game like anyone else. I mean its ridiculous to make a game yourself because you have a plan to do something, and guys just want to come in and fuck with people. Its not fair, we need the ability to have rules and keep it good for everyone.

In hardcore mode, there should be no "hostility mode" -- anyone can attack anyone at any time. While this may at first seem like the worst place to introduce such a feature, because death is permanent in hardcore, I think its actually the best place.

Why?

1) First of all, people who play hardcore are already willingly accepting a risk that their character can die, and they are OK with it. They specifically chose that option because they wanted the heightened sense of emotions, stress and joy, that come when you know that death is a real thing.

2) Cooperate play becomes a very interesting thing when its possible for your friend to stab you in the back. This heightened sense of excitement was lost with the shift from D1 to D2, and I think hardcore is the perfect way to bring it back without alienating the casual gamers who don't play hardcore anyway.

3) The general design decisions in D3 have been progressively shifting the game to make it more forgiving and easier. They took away the ability to mess up stat point allotment, they added respecs, and they gave it a more colorful exaggerated art style. While these decisions were obviously made in an attempt to broaden the appeal of the game, there are clearly a LOT of players who were very upset about these decisions...who really want a more hardcore game. They've already made soft-core more soft, so why not make hardcore more hardcore?

if you were the char in d2, anyone can kill u at anytime....... darwin

Pk will never work in a room based game like Diablo. If people start to get too annoyed by PK the ONLY thing that will ever happen is they creat a private games only, totally destroying the game for cooperative players, wich is cleary the main crowd of D3.
PK only works if you have a open world, were people don't have control about what they will find out there. If they have, they will pay the high price and close they doors to the strangers. And "pay high prices" to avoid bad things is what make bad games bad.


About how make D3 pvp good, i think they only need 3 things.
1) A map proper to pvp. Just a arena were people enter in oposite sides and starts to rock. Maybe some options like FFA, 2x2...
2) A in game tool to people organize their own championships and leagues.
3) Decent balance and diversification of items and skills pluss make the gameplay on pvp fun and alot more skill centered then what it was in D2. Nowdays people don't give a fuck to stuff like farm items and levels, those things are simply over fashioned. A pvp based at those two elements will fail, have no doubt.

I think every one is on the right track here. But i think it may be a bit easyer to set the rules when making the game. That way u could know what ur getting into b4 u even join the game. I think a Cool down on pots could add some difficulty to pvp and pve. Maybe a 1 min cd. Pots are all around abused in d2 imo.

Quote from "dorgeismydog" »

Thats because your one of the people who likes to kill people any time for any reason. Thats ridiculous and impunes gameplaay for other people, and takes away from them being able to enjoy the game like anyone else. I mean its ridiculous to make a game yourself because you have a plan to do something, and guys just want to come in and fuck with people. Its not fair, we need the ability to have rules and keep it good for everyone.

You sould try it some time.. its not as bad as u would think when ur on the winning side. It never really bothered me when some one killed me over and over, i would just leave the game. If i was doing somthing important it was probabley a private game. But naked kills was kinda on the low side.

I think an 'arena' as it has been previously discussed would satisfy everyone. Those who fear pks can stay out of it. Those who want to join in the fun can enter the arena and duke it out with anyone brave enough to stand against them. Theres no reason why we couldn't have arena matches with parties (2v2, 3v3, 5v5 etc), arena matches with more than 2 parties (ie 4 parties each with 2 players in a free for all 2v2v2v2), or arena matches that are simply a free for all with 8 players. This also opens up the possibilities of sanctioned duels, a ranking system, and maybe even prizes. There is huge potential here for some end game content, which would be a welcome improvement over D2 for many players.

I want friendly fire!. This adds a level of realism, so when you cast a high level firewall; it hurts anything that enters. The way it should.

Hardcore PK anyhtime is the worst idea ever. Then, the highest guy can just go off and eliminate every other hardcore character, and evertime somone makes a new one, lv9 and there dead again. Thats BS one or two guys cant run hardcore

Quote from "dorgeismydog" »

Hardcore PK anyhtime is the worst idea ever. Then, the highest guy can just go off and eliminate every other hardcore character, and evertime somone makes a new one, lv9 and there dead again. Thats BS one or two guys cant run hardcore

It would not be like that...

1) Players can make private password protected games to solo or co-op without intrusion of strangers

2) A hardcore player who joins your game would not even know where you are in the game world, and it's not as simple as checking 4 acts because its not like that in D3...its one big world with towns spread all over

3) Hardcore players are going to be wary about attacking other hardcore players because they might lose their own guy...and even if the person they attack is low level, he might have friends who put him on a hit list, or own other chars.

to whoever mentioned that hardcore characters are ready to die..this is just ridiculous to spend hundreds of hours on a character, and then some [censored] comes in and you die! O well, alls fair in an unfair duel "mechanic".

LOL i can see blizzard pulling there hair out already trying to balance pvp in diablo..

I can see the hardcore thing being more realistic.. whats stopping someone in real life from killing you? nothing. Just there conscience. Just like in real life.. if u kill some one. there might just be someone looking for you.

no, there will still be a way to find palyers, just like in d2. And the point of playing hardcore online DEFINATLY isnt to make locked password games, youd play hardcore singleplayer for that matter. Its just a bad mechanic, ans yes, the top player would rule all, it dont matter whjo has how amny characters of how many friends, when a high level can pick people off, its pointless. Even if it takes half an hour to target one guy, it took weeks to attain there level, so for every 2-3 weeks invested, half an hour kills. Its just a bad mechanic.

PVP would be great if there were abilities specifically for pvp, and battlegrounds where spawns would right against each other like dota.

items or buffs you could earn during the fight. Switches you could power as you win to activate defences; or as your losing bezerking abilities for side morale (its always fun to chunk enemies even when being overwhelmed).

so much awesome pvp (under team organising circumstances) specific storyline following material too, like witch doctor tribes battling it out where you could find the right amout of friends to follow you and activate the battle. All this would take alot of work to do though, and i wouldnt be suprised if they scrapped any ideas where not everyone would consider spending their time doing.