Wizard is officially the awesomest class they have announced. So much awesomer than the lame-ass witch doctor or the barb--not that barb is bad, but we've already played it, and it looks only pretty cool this time.
Admittedly, it's mostly a sorc copy, but hey, sorc is awesome too.
I'd really like to see their last two classes though... We don't have a zon-ish thing yet (one wonders if they will continue that tradition) and we will probably have another melee-ish class, like pally, with some auras or healz or something.
- mrdoom
- Registered User
-
Member for 17 years, 2 months, and 16 days
Last active Thu, Oct, 16 2008 16:04:39
- 0 Followers
- 191 Total Posts
- 0 Thanks
-
Oct 10, 2008mrdoom posted a message on New Class Announced: The WizardWhere is the gameplay video!?Posted in: News
-
Jul 13, 2008mrdoom posted a message on Diablo III Thoughts From Ex-Blizzard EmployeeDefinitely very interesting, especially since this kindof illustrates the conflicts that eventually led to Blizz North's being consolidated with the rest of blizz.Posted in: News
-
Jul 10, 2008mrdoom posted a message on Diablo III Trade and EconomyI'm glad they are trying to control the economy a bit more, 1.) because D2's economy was a disaster, and 2.) because it's more noob friendly, which I think is good--as long as it does not detract from the gameplay, which I don't think it does.Posted in: News
Also good to hear that their MIGHT be BOE in small doses. Makes it so people gotta work for their epically good items, and helps the economy some. -
Jul 9, 2008mrdoom posted a message on Official BlizzCast 5 Q&A SubmissionsPosted in: News
Unnecessary, and somewhat belligerentQuote from "DarthKarnage" »I would like to ask them what there reaction was (if any) to the childish reactions of the many internet users regarding the graphics of the new game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I want to ask about the skill trees and character advancement, but for some reason I doubt they will answer any of that stuff.
So I guess my question would also be "is that in fact a female druid shown in the artwork trailer?" -
Jul 5, 2008mrdoom posted a message on Blizzard Comments On The Classes In Diablo 3I think 5 is pretty good. With LOD it did seem like the Assassin and Druid were kindof overlaps of the Barb/Necro and Necro/Sorc respectively, the former because it was just another combat focused class with tons of attack moves and a few poison things which could be considered like necro stuff, and the latter being that the Druid has pets and casts some elemental spells, both already taken.Posted in: News
I want to see the rest of the classes!!1 -
Jul 4, 2008mrdoom posted a message on WWI - Diablo III Concept ArtOk, just so we're clear, I am NOT all that opposed to the current graphics (IE I would like to see a little more grit, but not enough to make a fuss), but some stupid things people are saying require response.Posted in: News
1.) "OMG the concept art looks totally cool/roxxor, it's not too dark!1"
Does it really MATTER? It's the GAME that we'll be playing, not the concept art. The 3D artists have deviated far from the concept art, clearly. Again, not a criticism, but I don't see the same goddamn game when I look at the art and the gameplay vid.
2.) "Just fiddle with your graphics settings!"
Not even gonna mention the fact that this shouldn't be done for moral principles.
If the whole goddamn point is for the game to have contrast, with some light areas and some dark, what happens when you change settings on your card? Suddenly the darker areas are pitch black, just so you can have the lighter areas you don't like look darker. No one will be able to see, and they won't find their way out of the first dungeon.
FUN!
3.) "You guys are dumb/fanboys/etc" (ESPECIALLY in response that stupid open letter to "Diablo 3 fanboys" found here: http://www.bingegamer.net/index.php/2008/an-open-letter-to-diablo-iii-fanboys)
Well, if we're going to play that game, that makes you WoW-loving, basement-residing, twenty-five-year-old virgins, does it not? TBH I'd rather be a fanboy. Not even gonna argue point by point in the open letter--I don't even disagree all that much, but some of those things were mindblowingly idiotic--I just wanted to state that he and everyone else who is unwilling to be constructive is an asshole.
Please, can we remain rational in our arguments?
Oh, and for those who continue to point out that the gameplay video isn't necessarily representative of the entire game, you get a big thumbs up:thumbsup: People need to remember this. -
Jul 1, 2008mrdoom posted a message on Diablo 3 Items and InventoryGotta say, with the focus being on staying in combat, the new inventory makes perfect sense. Tetris games inbetween battles slowed everything down.Posted in: News
-
Jun 28, 2008mrdoom posted a message on WWI Teaser Day 6Did anyone else see the name of the picture is "Ice 5 and a half?" We have one more pic, the revealer of the new game!Posted in: News
-
May 12, 2008mrdoom posted a message on Blizzcon 2008 AnnouncedOk, first off, "Hydra" was SC2, Wikipedia is right, but hasn't been updated recently apparently. I am affronted at the distrust of Wikipedia on this site, as it is the most amazing thing ever.Posted in: News
Blizz has 4 projects going, as far as we've heard. We know two, WotLK and SC2, and one is an MMO of some sort because we've seen the employment things. So either the MMO is D3, or the other game is D3 and the MMO is just World of Starcraft or something (lol), assuming they are making D3 of course.
Moving on...
OMG OMG OMFG Diablo 3 plx let me have!!11 =D <3 -
May 8, 2007mrdoom posted a message on Blizzard hiring Mobile DevelopersHehe, I dunno, Blizzard could have something cool cookin' up. They tend to be ahead of the game on stuff like this. Still, let's remember that if they're ANNOUNCING a game on May 19 then they've already got staff for it and have in all likelyhood been working on it for a bit. Remember those incredbily conspicuous job postings last year? Don't get too worried guys. These jobs are for some project far down the roadPosted in: News
-
Apr 29, 2007mrdoom posted a message on Blizzard Confirms New Product Next Month!I know what you mean, I loved D2 but D1 was really the best in terms of character customizability. I would hope that if D3 does turn out to be an MMO that they would do a class system similar to original Diablo, 'cause that would be an interesting way to do things. At the same time, I don't think they're going to make the next Diablo installment an MMO so other systems could still work.Posted in: News
Based on what they've done in the past, there'll probably be a completely new set of classes to pick from, but if they also decide to implement a progression system more like D1, that would kick ass.
In response to those who have lost faith that it will be Diablo 3, remember that Blizzard has disclosed info to gaming steve, and that the game has not only been in production, but that they started rumor mongering with the job postings back a year or two ago. With all that taken into consideration, it seems that announcing anything BUT D3 would be unlikely at best.
However, the fact that it's in Korea still raises the SC2 issues, and I think that combining six years of inactivity while they worked on WoW stuff and the fact that we've now had conflicting information regarding what game is likely to be released indicates more than one announcement. A dual title release would be perfect in terms of getting Blizzard back on track with creating other titles.
Remember also that Blizzard stated they had 4 projects they were working on, one of which would be announced in 2007. So what they could be doing is announcing both titles, but while D3 has been being worked on for a while and could release this year or early next, they could announce SC2 as having begun and give a release date somtime in the END of 2008.
But now my post is really long, so I'll stop typing heh.
*Edit* I forgot, but don't forget the biggest thing yet. Diablo has had a lot of trademark activity in the last 2 years. There has been nothing like that for SC2, and they would do that BEFORE a release. So if they're announcing anything but something WoW related it HAS to be D3 since that's the only thing they've done trademark stuff for recently. HAH! So it has to be D3. -
Apr 28, 2007mrdoom posted a message on Blizzard Confirms New Product Next Month!I wouldn't be surprised if some new Blizzard game was on console, but I doubt they'd put anything on any console except 360. I mean, think, the've always made PC games, so the main console they'd be interested in would probably be one that allows for players to play vs PC players (a functionality that Microsoft is adding soon). I'm all but sure it will be Diablo3 they announce, despite it being Korea, because of all the hassle they've gone through in developing it over the last four years. I think they've finally finished. But in any case, if it's on console, I trust Blizz to make it badass. I would prefer a PC game, but I look at it this way: Blizzard has come out with 7 games and 6 expansion packs in the last decade or so. ALL of them have been so incredibly awesome that people lose bowel control upon first seeing them. Ever since WC1 all of their games have owned. So if Blizzard is trying something new, it's gonna kick some serious ass.Posted in: News
But that's just me. -
Apr 27, 2007mrdoom posted a message on Blizzard Confirms New Product Next Month!Blizzard is messing with us. They're smart. They know that all the info about D3 means that most people will be expecting that. So it's just like them to announce it in Korea. It's all a ploy to keep people guessing as to what the game will be. I'm not saying it's guarenteed to be D3, but I don't think a single rumor and VERY recent happenings are going to contradict 4 years of rumor and very explicit job postings.Posted in: News
I repeat, BLIZZARD IS MESSING WITH YOUR MIND!!! I personally enjoy it. It makes me less certain what it will be, and that's a great tactic. In fact, it's very possible that they're announcing two titles. Think about it, they get everyone speculating as to what the game will be, they have several conflicting rumors floating around, and JUST when everyone is about to go into cardiac arrest from the anticipation, BAM!!! Dual title announcement. Everyone is happy, especially the Koreans.
If I'm right, everyone who thought differently has to give me a cookie. Any takers? -
Apr 27, 2007mrdoom posted a message on Blizzard Confirms New Product Next Month!Been there a few times, I've got an accountPosted in: News
Thanks for reminding me though, haven't been there in a month. - To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
0
I am one of those who doesn't think the name Wizard is all that great. Some alternative names could be:
Elementist
Channeler
Magus
Conjurer (not, in fact, identical to a summoner)
And I invite others to think of more. However, the name Wizard isn't that offensive, I would just prefer another if at all possible.
Also, I keep hearing people refer to the class archetypes left, and mention the rogue and knight, but also mention a ranger.
Has no one ever played Diablo here before?
Rogue = Ranged class, morons, remember D1? There has never been a stealth class like the rogue is generally associated with in Diablo, and probably never will be. Diablo is about killing lots of people, not sneaking around.
So we have:
Barb - Melee Class - Offensive
Wizard - Magic class
Witch Doctor - Pet/magic class... the summoner
What's left?
Knight - Melee class, balanced or defensive, possibly with secondary abilities like pally had
Rogue - RANGED CLASS, uses primarily bows, probably not stupid nature rangerish class, something more along the lines of the rogue and amazon before, BOW SKILLS, with magical bow and other ranged weapon attacks.
As for the Wizard, I don't know what exactly is so wrong with it. It's just a repackaged sorc. I want the sorc back, so aside from the mildly annoying name it's a great class. Make it's name better, and it's ideal, or just make it the returning Sorc.
And the old skill system in d2 was, frankly, bad. I love D2, but the skill system was terrible. There was limited flexibility and wasted points because of prerequisites, and any system that encourages saving points at low levels shows just how broken it is.
Plus, there were so many redundant skills! For example, on sorc there are three different fierballs... They are all the same in terms of usage, with only minor differences like splash damage or whatever. Why not just have ONE fireball skill, and scale it so that it doesn't suck at high levels if you keep putting points into it?
The new skill system is better than the old in some of these respects, and for that I congratulate blizz. Spells are pretty much unique (at least in their trees) and they seem like they are built to scale with level better.
0
Admittedly, it's mostly a sorc copy, but hey, sorc is awesome too.
I'd really like to see their last two classes though... We don't have a zon-ish thing yet (one wonders if they will continue that tradition) and we will probably have another melee-ish class, like pally, with some auras or healz or something.
0
0
0
And lame But whatever, blizz wouldn't show more until more was ready anyway, probably.
0
0
Also good to hear that their MIGHT be BOE in small doses. Makes it so people gotta work for their epically good items, and helps the economy some.
0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I want to ask about the skill trees and character advancement, but for some reason I doubt they will answer any of that stuff.
So I guess my question would also be "is that in fact a female druid shown in the artwork trailer?"
0
It would be great to have some ability to go back on abilities in the short-term though, as some people have suggested. This prevents accidental skill spending, which is definitely and issue.
Actually, it might be cool to have like a one-time-only respec that's obtainable through a quest or something. That way, if people want to try out new things without rerolling, they can, but only once on a given character. It also means that noobs who just kindof placed abilities whereever have a chance to give themselves a better setup without rerolling, if only once.
Not totally sure the one-time respec would work out, but I like the theory.
0
Nothing has worked:(
0
No wonder everyone posts here:P It's too damn hard to figure out the bnet forums.
0
I want to see the rest of the classes!!1
0
However, I got the the battle net site, and there is no where to make a goddamn account. Nothing. I went to the forums and tried to post, and it asked me for account, password, and cdkey, and I was like "ok, where do I GET an account!?" There's no signup button anywhere.
THEN I get the brilliant idea "hey, it must mean like my battlenet account ONLINE, like the one I use for Diablo 2" So I tried using that account name and password, along with my CDkey. Another failure.
I am 100% sure I will feel like an idiot after someone finally posts how to join the goddamn blizzard forums, but I maintain that they are stupid, designed by stupid people, and are the worst failure I have seen in a long time.
Help!!
0
1.) "OMG the concept art looks totally cool/roxxor, it's not too dark!1"
Does it really MATTER? It's the GAME that we'll be playing, not the concept art. The 3D artists have deviated far from the concept art, clearly. Again, not a criticism, but I don't see the same goddamn game when I look at the art and the gameplay vid.
2.) "Just fiddle with your graphics settings!"
Not even gonna mention the fact that this shouldn't be done for moral principles.
If the whole goddamn point is for the game to have contrast, with some light areas and some dark, what happens when you change settings on your card? Suddenly the darker areas are pitch black, just so you can have the lighter areas you don't like look darker. No one will be able to see, and they won't find their way out of the first dungeon.
FUN!
3.) "You guys are dumb/fanboys/etc" (ESPECIALLY in response that stupid open letter to "Diablo 3 fanboys" found here: http://www.bingegamer.net/index.php/2008/an-open-letter-to-diablo-iii-fanboys)
Well, if we're going to play that game, that makes you WoW-loving, basement-residing, twenty-five-year-old virgins, does it not? TBH I'd rather be a fanboy. Not even gonna argue point by point in the open letter--I don't even disagree all that much, but some of those things were mindblowingly idiotic--I just wanted to state that he and everyone else who is unwilling to be constructive is an asshole.
Please, can we remain rational in our arguments?
Oh, and for those who continue to point out that the gameplay video isn't necessarily representative of the entire game, you get a big thumbs up:thumbsup: People need to remember this.
0
So BOE and BOP implemented, definitely, more so with the former. BOP should be reserved for situations like items earned through PVP (assuming there is a reward system) or for quest items.
The last issue needed to address though, is using alternate currencies. TBH, it would be difficult to design the game so that gold remains necessary in online play, and therefore remains the currency standard (though I hope blizz will try, since that is much easier to work with) but if not, then there needs to be a way to take runes/SOJs/whatever out of the economy, so that it doesn't become inflated.
One is already in place, socketed items (for runes/other socketables) but TBH it's not enough. What is needed is like a trade comission; a tax on trades or sales. Like the autionhouse commission in many MMOs, but applying to item trading as well. Now how the hell would you do that? No idea. Which is why it would be easier to try and keep gold as the main currency, because that's not as difficult to control. But one thing is for damn sure; if there aren't items being taken out of the economy, it will go south, just like every other online game that didn't have them. D2 was not the first, for those of you who are unaware.