The Sorceress from D2 was the first teacher of the Wizard in D3. You learn that she ends up getting killed by mage assassins or whatever in the short story firefly.
Wasn't that she killed by the assassin from d2?
It was never stated that it was the same assassin from d2, just an assassin from her order.
I've gotten the quest where the apprentice lives, but how are you so sure that in the event where he dies, that he's not the same apprentice, just in a different ...situation?
At the end of the day, it should matter to an extent, but not a whole lot. You can just say her bra/top is the Barbarian equivalent of a push-up bra. Or Barb magic.
Also, body building is irrelevant, as sure they are strong, but the muscle definitions they build are mostly for show, NOT necessarily for use. This goes for men and women. Compare body builders to strong-man bodies (built for use).
I'll agree that it makes logical sense that pirates do exist in the world of Sanctuary.
As for Demon Hunter, I respect your opinion that you may not like its concept, but I personally like it. It has a Batman feel (vengeance/anger) with a little Blade (all of their strength (dark magic) none of their weaknesses (easily killable)) add in.
And the way I see the "profession" thing is that when a DH kill a demon, it's more personal, when the other classes kill a demon, it's more or less cause it's in the way.
We may digress a little, but talking about classes in general is somewhat still on point heheh
Theorizing future content is just for fun, no need to be all serious-buisness.
And why would adding back the Paly to the expo be lame? We're not talking about adding all the old classes, just a few. Why can't it be D3 with 2 old class returning?
I will preface this with: Meshif. Definitely a "pirate/high-seas"-esque character in Diablo 2.
Blades, cutlasses, etc., "Pirate" could pretty much be a thief/rogue class. That's what a "Pirate" is on land, yes?
"Pirate" as a class? I hope not. I already am disappointed in the Demon Hunter...which as a side note, is a pretty stupid class concept/name considering every class, in every Diablo game...HUNTS DEMONS. :|
Meshif is a sea merchant and not all the classes hunt demons as their profession.
Just because "pirate swords" are in Diablo 3 doesn't mean that they are in fact pirate swords. Could anyone not have come up with the same design besides a pirate? Just because pirates of old wielded them doesn't actually coin them being pirate-only swords, plenty of others wielded such.
Yes, but the item in question is literally called a "Pirate Sword", the exceptional item version of the Cutlass.
You don't have to be a pirate to use them, sure, but that's what they're called in-game.
The Diablo games were always on the perspective of humans, since humans had more to lose in the conflict than angels and demons. So no on a non-human character. Even half-humans were tried with the original concept of the DH, but they scrapped it.
As for the whole gun debate, I can see where Savages is coming from, but at the same time, I believe the first firearm that you can call a "gun" did exist in medieval times.
And then lore-wise, we have a barbarian who had an idea to make a gun. Is it unrealistic to believe that 20 years later, no one else thought of the same idea or even created one?
As for style, when I first watched the Demon Hunter trailer, the first thing I thought was "Wow, they're really stepping it up with new weaponry and techniques to kill demons". So it wasn't farfetched to me that guns would've worked in the trailer or game, plus the 1-handed crossbows had very very similar designs to ancient guns in their handles.
0
It was never stated that it was the same assassin from d2, just an assassin from her order.
0
0
0
0
0
Besides, my version of that quest, he did not die, and he was the pupil of the original Necro anyways.
0
Also, insulting one's post count is the lamest thing on the internet. Please get a life LOLOLOL (<-- Also lame, but I don't care HAHAHAH)
0
Also, who cares if d3's Tristram isn't a 100% carbon copy. Seriously, this isn't Diablo 1.5... or 2.5 for that matter...
0
At the end of the day, it should matter to an extent, but not a whole lot. You can just say her bra/top is the Barbarian equivalent of a push-up bra. Or Barb magic.
Also, body building is irrelevant, as sure they are strong, but the muscle definitions they build are mostly for show, NOT necessarily for use. This goes for men and women. Compare body builders to strong-man bodies (built for use).
0
As for Demon Hunter, I respect your opinion that you may not like its concept, but I personally like it. It has a Batman feel (vengeance/anger) with a little Blade (all of their strength (dark magic) none of their weaknesses (easily killable)) add in.
And the way I see the "profession" thing is that when a DH kill a demon, it's more personal, when the other classes kill a demon, it's more or less cause it's in the way.
We may digress a little, but talking about classes in general is somewhat still on point heheh
0
And why would adding back the Paly to the expo be lame? We're not talking about adding all the old classes, just a few. Why can't it be D3 with 2 old class returning?
0
Meshif is a sea merchant and not all the classes hunt demons as their profession.
0
Yes, but the item in question is literally called a "Pirate Sword", the exceptional item version of the Cutlass.
You don't have to be a pirate to use them, sure, but that's what they're called in-game.
0
0
And then lore-wise, we have a barbarian who had an idea to make a gun. Is it unrealistic to believe that 20 years later, no one else thought of the same idea or even created one?
As for style, when I first watched the Demon Hunter trailer, the first thing I thought was "Wow, they're really stepping it up with new weaponry and techniques to kill demons". So it wasn't farfetched to me that guns would've worked in the trailer or game, plus the 1-handed crossbows had very very similar designs to ancient guns in their handles.