I don't like the idea of voting someone who we have no evidence for or against, they die, we end up with nothing gained just one less chance of surviving. :/
Going with my suspicion.
Vote: Molster
Thing is, someone not posting can be two things.
1. They're lurking scum and unless we punish lurking, they'll continue to just sit back and surf under the radar.
2. They're an inactive innocent whose only contribution is padding our safety buffer against a loss. But it's better to lynch those than active innocents, since active innocents actually contribute to us finding scum.
Either way, it's usually better to vote out inactives when you have no leads at all.
thats why I want to go back on what I alreayd posted, and noone commented on.
but I duno...if apple is good, then we are losing a someone we need, if we kill someone who is good...and is not playing...we didnt lose much, thats my thoughts until we get some solid theories going at least.
Going for the people that are not playing to me is a win/win but I guess thats just me?
I actually agree with the idea of voting out lurkers more than actives. At least when we have no leads.
Honestly, Fire and Apples probably are both innocents. The real mafia are likely just sitting back watching this all confident-like because that's usually how Day 1 plays out.
That being said, I don't think we should worry all that much about lynching an innocent. This is how the game plays out, we inevitably lynch innocents. This isn't a bad thing though for several reasons:
1. It narrows the field, both by eliminating wrong ideas about the lynch-ee and by reducing possible options for those that remain.
2. It gives us information about the lynched player's role.
3. We can glean information on who might be scum based on voting patterns and what is said.
Really, unless we get a lucky guess, I don't think it will be until... Day 3 until we lynch a scum. That's just an estimate based on how mafia games in general tend to play out.
because obviously there were 3 evils before illith joined. hes probably a neutral.
Or he could just as easily be an evil convert who isn't one of the 3 big bads. Always gotta be careful about assuming roles with people who join when the game is already in progress.
Cel you played so abrasively that you pulled my attention from Molsterr, Dagger and Donsro onto you!
Hehe, sorry about that. I can be kinda abrasive in general in these games, but then sometimes I can enter this incredibly indignant righteous fury mode where I'm even worse. XD
All that said, I'm genuinely surprised I wasn't murdered on Night 2-3. I often don't live that long while pro-town because I tend to be really good at convincing others of my innocence.
(And I had a strong feeling Gunner was townie from the end of Day 1. Rather meta, but he didn't vote for me once, and whenever I'm scum he seems to psychically home in on me from the start. So I had a good feeling he was reasonably sure I was innocent near the start, as I thought he was hehe.)
0
Thing is, someone not posting can be two things.
1. They're lurking scum and unless we punish lurking, they'll continue to just sit back and surf under the radar.
2. They're an inactive innocent whose only contribution is padding our safety buffer against a loss. But it's better to lynch those than active innocents, since active innocents actually contribute to us finding scum.
Either way, it's usually better to vote out inactives when you have no leads at all.
0
Vote: Knucker
0
I actually agree with the idea of voting out lurkers more than actives. At least when we have no leads.
0
That being said, I don't think we should worry all that much about lynching an innocent. This is how the game plays out, we inevitably lynch innocents. This isn't a bad thing though for several reasons:
1. It narrows the field, both by eliminating wrong ideas about the lynch-ee and by reducing possible options for those that remain.
2. It gives us information about the lynched player's role.
3. We can glean information on who might be scum based on voting patterns and what is said.
Really, unless we get a lucky guess, I don't think it will be until... Day 3 until we lynch a scum. That's just an estimate based on how mafia games in general tend to play out.
0
"more"
How's that for ya? ^___^
0
Or he could just as easily be an evil convert who isn't one of the 3 big bads. Always gotta be careful about assuming roles with people who join when the game is already in progress.
Also, what's with the mass bandwagon on Fire?
0
0
Actually aside from that one string where I was mafia 2 (or maybe 3 times?) in a row recently, I tend to end up as town side more often than not.
And yet I never get Cop...
Then maybe that's for the best, since I usually die so early in the meta-game, me being Cop would probably be like throwing it away lol.
0
Hehe, sorry about that. I can be kinda abrasive in general in these games, but then sometimes I can enter this incredibly indignant righteous fury mode where I'm even worse. XD
0
0
0
On the plus side, I apparently managed to completely throw off any suspicion of being the doctor so I guess that works...
0
0
0