Get an Epic Experience with Premium
  • posted a message on Reason to play Seasons
    Pointless debate is pointless. If you like the ladder (season) and what it offers, play it. If you do not, do not play it. There is no reason in arguing. I am glad that there are no superior rewards which force me to play the season. If others want to compete about X, farm item Y, get Transmog template Z and enjoy it, it is their matter. There is simply no reason to say that one mode is worse resp. better than the other; just different interests.
    Posted in: General Discussion
  • posted a message on Release date for 2.1?
    Hopefully later than sooner in order to fix everything. I do not need resp. want a patch which is full of unnecessary bugs just to satisfy the impatient players.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • posted a message on How to Fix Wizard
    Quote from eple
    Yes WD is way easier than wiz.

    But that doesn't change the fact that the fotm fire (mb+mm/conflag)spec is too strong.

    Wiz needs some serious attention to the other elements, else blizz may as well rename the class to firebird.

    Yes, you are absolutely right. I like playing my Fire Wizard but I would also love to play as Cold or Lightning without crippling myself that much. I can understand that, for instance, Cold has to be lower in terms of damage because of chill or freeze effects but the loss of damage is not comparable to the gain of chill or freeze effects. Lightning is a sad chapter of its own.
    Posted in: Wizard: The Ancient Repositories
  • posted a message on Planned 2.1 class?
    Wizard.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • posted a message on Live Server Bug - Doom for HC Players
    Quote from trogvar
    In my opinion only masochists plays D3 HC :) Because it doesnt depend on skill like it was in D2 but more on how lucky you are not to get any lags.

    Remember auto-quit? Everyone - no matter if HC or SC - deserves a good game in terms of bugs.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • posted a message on Item/Option to reset weapon to original form
    Quote from binnesman5
    Why don't you just reroll the socket of your current weapon, then add a gift onto it afterward?

    Some players found a weapon with a socket and re-rolled something else instead.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • posted a message on R.I.P Magic Missile-Conflagrate.
    This is just the PTR. Wait and see how it works out in the long run.

    Edit:
    Yes, you are right, Xdmini. Missed it during the first time. Deleted the link in order to avoid confusion.
    Posted in: Wizard: The Ancient Repositories
  • posted a message on How many of you got wand of woh yet then?
    Quote from Drahque

    Quote from Bandyto
    Quote from Drahque
    Quote fromBandyto Wow, I have not seen such an arrogant and ignorant post for a very long time in these forums. These pseudo-statistical assumptions (9 out of 10, 300-800 hours average etc.) in combination with this egocentric point of view are just disgusting. It seems like your "world" consists of: "What I do is right, everyone who does it not like me does it wrong." Glad to hear that it is quite simple and that you have been playing over 1.000 hours on Wizard since the RoS release althoughyesterday you claimed that you had been playing 946 hours since the release,i.e.over 54 hours within approximately 24 hours. I wish I would be as great as you are and I could swim in a sea of Wohs.

    If you were to have read all my posts, you'd know im multiboxing. I have 965 hours on main account. 429 and 408 on alts. Thats about 1800 playtime in total.

    Its not pseudo, its called stasticial math, and YES, I'm right, because MATH has ONLY ONE ANSWER, JUST ONE. Its not like 2+2 =4 for me and 2+2 = 5 for you, no? .. huh. Your the one who don't check up on stuff before posting, not me. Get your fact right or dont say anything. Simple as that.

    And if you even spend any time reading my posts, you'd know you can ALWAYS add me; Drahque#1198, if you don't believe me. I can prove anything I say. I have no reasons to make up things, lie or not tell the truth.

    So, you are multiboxing which is not officially supported by Blizzard and potentially includes the usage of not allowed third party software in order to play multiple characters, i.e. Wizards, simultaneously, summarize the played hours, compare these numbers with non-multiboxers and claim they might do not play enough respectively tell them to play more (and in some posts how they should play).

    This is a highly questionable method. Diablo III is designed for non-multiboxing play.

    AGAIN, you state things thats NOT true. You REALLY need to check up on your facts before you speak .. oh God, yet again I have to correct you. Listen carefully, MULTI-BOXING IS not against the rules, as long as:
    a) It isn't automated (which means bot or that the program do something for you that you didnt do yourself, such as automatically use potion at 20 % hp or that they would follow eachother due to color etc. which Isboxer does NOT contain. There is NO automation in ISBoxer).
    b) The program reads the RAM of the game and use that info. ISBoxer does NOT do that as well.

    Thoose, Multi-Boxing IS ALLOWED, because its me controlling 3 chars with my KEYBOARD AND MOUSE. Its my movements, mistakes, press on spells etc. that I do. Multiboxing has a lot of extra work aswell.

    Now for your other statement, that im comparing. Yes, I can compare 1800 hours, 4 wohs to others. It makes no difference if its 1, 2, 3 or 4 chars you have. Except that it goes "faster" with more. But the thing is, 3 if the wohs I found WITHOUT multi-boxing. 2 of them before I started and 1 while boosting on main.

    Yes, 900 hours, 3 wand of wohs IS lucky. But people who have 100 or 200 hours played as wizard, and whines not to have a Woh, obviously have NOT spend enough time. Just considering 1800 / 4 = 450 hours, and including my luck and basic statistical calculations it takes on average at least 500-800 hours. There is another topic on this very forum doing the math for you and I think I've already repeated enough now. Literally just shush, if you don't know stuff. Stop making up untrue statements. Your obviously just butthurt.

    I did not say with a single word that multiboxing is forbidden or illegal (see "not officially supported") and I did not say that you are using not allowed third party software (see "potentially") but according to your extensive reaction including sweet caps lock it seems to me that I have hit a sensitive point here.

    In addition, the point is about being "faster" because some players argue about the speed of item progression. I do not want to commentate if item progression is fine or not but you are definitely faster as a multiboxer and therefore your numbers are hardly comparable with non-multiboxers in terms of item progression during real time.

    Thanks for worrying about my butt. I was just in the bathroom and it works like a charm. How is your butt today? Everything fine?
    Posted in: Wizard: The Ancient Repositories
  • posted a message on How many of you got wand of woh yet then?
    Quote from Drahque


    Quote fromBandyto Wow, I have not seen such an arrogant and ignorant post for a very long time in these forums. These pseudo-statistical assumptions (9 out of 10, 300-800 hours average etc.) in combination with this egocentric point of view are just disgusting. It seems like your "world" consists of: "What I do is right, everyone who does it not like me does it wrong." Glad to hear that it is quite simple and that you have been playing over 1.000 hours on Wizard since the RoS release althoughyesterday you claimed that you had been playing 946 hours since the release,i.e.over 54 hours within approximately 24 hours. I wish I would be as great as you are and I could swim in a sea of Wohs.

    If you were to have read all my posts, you'd know im multiboxing. I have 965 hours on main account. 429 and 408 on alts. Thats about 1800 playtime in total.

    Its not pseudo, its called stasticial math, and YES, I'm right, because MATH has ONLY ONE ANSWER, JUST ONE. Its not like 2+2 =4 for me and 2+2 = 5 for you, no? .. huh. Your the one who don't check up on stuff before posting, not me. Get your fact right or dont say anything. Simple as that.

    And if you even spend any time reading my posts, you'd know you can ALWAYS add me; Drahque#1198, if you don't believe me. I can prove anything I say. I have no reasons to make up things, lie or not tell the truth.

    So, you are multiboxing which is not officially supported by Blizzard and potentially includes the usage of not allowed third party software in order to play multiple characters, i.e. Wizards, simultaneously, summarize the played hours, compare these numbers with non-multiboxers and claim they might do not play enough respectively tell them to play more (and in some posts how they should play).

    This is a highly questionable method. Diablo III is designed for non-multiboxing play.
    Posted in: Wizard: The Ancient Repositories
  • posted a message on How many of you got wand of woh yet then?
    Quote from Drahque
    All of thoose, or least 9 out of 10 people who say they havent found a woh yet, havent really played wizard much or done enough rift

    I found: 1 rimeheart, 3 shard of hates, 9 thunderfurys, 4 wand of wohs, 2 furnace, 2 velvett camerals (electrocute helmet) etc.

    If you compare, for example Kichaa, just 1 TF vs. my 9 TF, it obviously showed I farmed a lot more legs.

    The thing is, woh is 64 % more rare than SoH, and 228 % more rare than TF ! Why expect you can find a 1.52 % weap when you have only found 1x 5 % and 0x 2.5 % ? :)

    Its quite simple, if you want a Wand of Woh, you gotta speed-farm T2-5 and play WIZARD, ONLY WIZARD. A lot people have different classes, like crusader or WD as well. I have over 1000 hours on wizard sine RoS. You gotta play Wizard to find Wands. :) I know a lot of people, friends, in-game on D3 who say: "Why I havent found woh?" and then I check their profile, 86 hours played as Wiz, 200+ as WD and other stuff. Thats just NOT enough. On average, it tales 300-800 hours to find Wand of Woh.

    Wow, I have not seen such an arrogant and ignorant post for a very long time in these forums. These pseudo-statistical assumptions (9 out of 10, 300-800 hours average etc.) in combination with this egocentric point of view are just disgusting. It seems like your "world" consists of: "What I do is right, everyone who does it not like me does it wrong." Glad to hear that it is quite simple and that you have been playing over 1.000 hours on Wizard since the RoS release although yesterday you claimed that you had been playing 946 hours since the release,i.e.over 54 hours within approximately 24 hours. I wish I would be as great as you are and I could swim in a sea of Wohs.
    Posted in: Wizard: The Ancient Repositories
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.