DiabloFans

Quote from Tybudd

Bullshit, how you gonna try to say that it was a bug, the damn patch notes noted 1500%, that's not a damn bug, maybe a mistake, or maybe they didn't realize that the majority of DH's would take advantage of this, but don't call it a damn bug!!!!!

I normally don't get mad but that's a damn slap in the face!!

Read the entire post and THEN reply.

Quote from Karalius

Quote from Nordicus

Can't wait until Diablo 4 hits in 2037. Than people will be all "Oh you destroyed my franchise. Diablo 3 was the best thing, you greedy bastards. It was perfect, but your new team sucks."

Move along now.

As much as op is retarded, your post was pretty stupid too
I think it is safe to assume everyone will remember d3 as being a big failure, at least from everyone's expectation and hype point of view.

That's exactly what people were saying about D2 shortly after it was released.

Quote from Ewyna

Discuss dont get tihs locked.Blizzard did lost.That company basicly is more legal than ever now lol quite funny.

Reread the info you posted. Neither side won or lost as no judgments were made. It was nothing more than an informational hearing. The court heard from both sides and will rule on the original injunction (which still stands) on July 17. The original injunction bars them from allowing anyone in Germany to use the bot or buy it.

Quote from PeaceMaker2008

I have 6 % life steal, which brings me to a total of 1.2 % true, after the diminishing returns.
I also have 48 % CH chance and 300 % ch damage.
Keeping that in mind I hit 50-100 k damage on regular hits with normal attacks. 100-200 k with revenge and another 100 k with overpower.
I have 0 life on hit.
Long story short, with the right stats Life Steal > Life on Hit, simple as that..

Which amounts to a whole 2400 IF you crit. You could easily get more health if you decided to go with Life on Hit items. As of now, Life on Hit is better and will be for quite some time.

Quote from LaplaceNoMa

Actually DH are the least affected by this nerf since their main damage source is +critdmg

If you are gearing for crit damage over ias you are doing it wrong.

Quote from Madwizz

oh ok, so the items with ias will be shit in a can now.

IAS is still going to be the best stat so we'll still want it on every possible slot. The only difference is there is less on items, so deciding which stat combo may take a bit more thought.

Quote from cw30000

Thanks blizzard. Instead of solving the problem, you make players suffer for your incompetence.

This input limit will not solve the problem of botting. They can just add (random) delay and botting will continue. Just at a slower pace.

How about making an incentive to reward people who play the game as it is intended for.

You mean they want us to actually PLAY the game? Perish the thought!

Quote from Kisho

These whine threads exist for every single class. It's Inferno that is incredibly difficult, which makes you feel like you're broken: pretty much every problem you have will be fixed once Inferno is re-balanced.

Also, FYI: claiming stuff like 'Blizzard didn't test this class!' or 'Blizzard don't know their own game!' or anything similar makes you look like a complete tool. If you want your post to be taken seriously, be more constructive and respectful.

Well said and couldn't agree more.

I find the WD to be pretty solid in Inferno. The one thing I'll agree with the op on is pets. It would be nice to have them out at some point in Inferno.

Quote from Bubeech

There is nothing "powerful" about WD -- a bunch of half-assed skills with runes and a broken resource system.

Perhaps the class just isn't for everyone. Thus far it's been the easiest to go through content for me. I'm certainly not the only one who thinks so.

Quote from lMarcusl

"Nobody wants to farm the 2nd difficulty, nobody. That shouldnt even be an option."

Oh my god please somebody tell me which idiot wrote that. I need someone to slap right now. If this is the feedback Blizz is getting, we can expect an Inferno nerf by the end of next week. I hope they stick to what they aimed at and keep the game as hard as it can be...forever.

Hah, exactly what I thought. I'm guessing he hasn't played a Diablo game before.

Quote from MasterFischer

Thanks for the input guys..... The length of this thread is a testament to just how important people (including myself) think this is.

No, it's a testament to just how many people are sick of others whining about the smallest things. A quick read through the thread makes that painfully clear.

Balance? This isn't WoW, nerd. It's Diablo. Eventually, all classes will be OP'd, like in D2. The only joke in this thread is your derp QQ.

Quote from GTTMonk

just wanted to post it somewhere else too in case it gets deleted on blizz forums

...and on that note, this entire post should be deleted for a strong troll effort..."

A; No shit bud, Blizzard is a business. Making smart business moves kind of.... comes with the territory.
B; D3 took 5 years to develop, stop citing the start time as when Diablo 2 launched.
C; Yes, they took less time to develop their games at the start, and pooled all their resources into one game at a time. Why? Because they were a tiny company, and the games they made were really simple.
D; You give no actual facts or points as to why you think D3 is broken / sub-par / superdy duper bad, you just spout of those words.
E; People didn't want to move from SC1 to SC2 because SC1 was almost perfectly balanced, and it had become an Esport. Players had spent countless hours on perfecting their game to beat other players, it only makes sense some were hesitant.

I also like how you just assume the million annual pass subs would have just quit wow, I like making up numbers too!

TLDR; More QQ about Blizzard being a company, and a smart one at that, and you don't like a game they have made. Mind if I check up on you in a week, see if you still play?

Blizzard releases a game you didn't like as much as you thought you would. Explanation:

1. BLIZZARD CONSPIRACY!
2. BLIZZARD LIES!
3. BLIZZARD HAS DIFFERENT IDEAS THAN ME ABOUT WHAT MAKES A GAME GOOD, AND THAT MAKES THEM WRONG!
4. NOT EVERYTHING BLIZZARD MAKES WILL FEEL TAILOR-MADE FOR ME, BUT THAT'S LIFE!

lol. Just kidding about that last one. It's completely unreasonable.

...

Why do people need to construct such baroque narratives in which to couch their disappointment?

Quote from Gheed2010

Quote from Findulidas

Thats still a far way until you reach contempt for solo players and pvpers.

Uh, no. Part of solo play in a computer game is being able to sit on a plane, bus, a cafe somewhere, and just play your damn game. And PVP doesn't exist, and when it does, it will probably be walled off from regular game assets.

D3 has some amazing production values and truly innovative elements, but that doesn't mean you need to distort the most basic facts to defend their decisions, decisions which do have legitimate business motivations.

Oh, so you hide your always-online hate behind something else. Got it. They had other business considerations like security, too, but, you must keep the Blizzard hate machine running, and of course, to people like you, making money is criminal. They should give you your games for free, and always written just for you. Get over it. Life doesn't work that way.

You knew it was always online months before release, so why are you whining about it AFTER you bought the game? If you felt that strongly about it, why buy it at all? No sympathy here, sorry. No one hid that single-player was still online.

But, if you don't like it, Torchlight II is around the corner, and while it'll be good, imo, it'll have the stuff you really wanted -- a D2 updated with a lot less changes. Have fun.

Gear>Class in D3.

Edit - I know this is a tired contrast, but D3 isn't WoW where you'd have a very clear progression and could say "a combat rogue in set x should do Z DPS". Gear is not as linear in D3, and as such neither is DPS. Also, you can be pretty sure, almost no one will be walking around in full Best in Slot gear for a long time, and different builds will naturally scale differently at different gear levels.

There just isn't an easy answer.

ignore beta, he thinks he has some kind of inside information but actually is full of shit

The AMD is cheaper...the Intel is more powerful. Pick your poison.

If this is purely for Diablo 3, save yourself the $$ and get the AMD. If you are just upgrading in general, get the Intel.

If it was me, I would get the 2500k (in fact, I did :P)

Most people won't notice the performance difference between the 2500k and the 3570k. However, if you plan on overclocking, the Ivy Bridge will probably be able to achive higher overclocks.

But really, unless you are going to SLI/Crossfire high end GPU's (which you don't appear to be), the 2500k is more than enough.

If you can wait, then definitely go for the 3570k (they aren't coming until April). Otherwise, stick with the 2500k.

Alienware is a waste of money in my opinion.

It's between the XPS17 and the Sager. Based on the prices and the specs you gave me, I'd say the Sager is a better deal. They make great quality laptops (from what I've read, never owned one).

Sager gets my vote.

Quote from JaundiceBunny

Seriously, it's cool that you can read Korean relatively well, so chances are you area right. :Thumbs Up: Would you mind translating this piece then? Actually just the last paragraph!

Will the GBR give their decision on the 4th of Jan (They say Monday, but then it's the 2de of Jan)?

The article is about D3's rating being delayed until next year(well technically it's just 1 week though). GRB originally planned to give D3 a rating on Dec 28th, but has postponed it until the next meeting in Jan 4th. GRB knows that RMAH does not break any Korean laws, but is worried that if they approve RMAH, other companies in Korea(mostly those who make online gambling games I guess, since GRB has been super cautious of those) might copy and exploit this feature. Since it is a feature being introduced to the industry for the first time, they want to check every possibility carefully.

What the last paragraph says is : 'GRB members agreed to further investigate the possible influence this feature(RMAH) might have in detail, by postponing the rating, not rejecting it. So the final rating of D3 is expected to be decided on their next meeting on Jan 4th, 2012.'

So yes, it is expected to happen on Jan 4th.But you know, GRB delayed it twice already, so nobody knows for sure I guess.

And sorry if I sounded rude, angry or anything in the prior post, I did not mean that. I just did not want the wrong information to spread.

EDIT: I do not see 'Monday' being mentioned anywhere, might be the evil auto-translator thing again.