Quote from mlwhiteley
So why did yall try to sneak PvP in with Horde mode? lol, trying to make it look like people want PvP to be the end game...
wow.... awesome first post.
Quote from mlwhiteley
So why did yall try to sneak PvP in with Horde mode? lol, trying to make it look like people want PvP to be the end game...
Quote from Simpy7
Quote from mindstain
Guess what. There is no end-all solution to hacking. There are some pretty functional safeguards to duping though, and the RMAH is going to be a very good strategy to do just that. Not because it will generate extra money for Blizzard to purchase a bunch of scrubs to sit in each others laps and type faster with four hands on a keyboard vs. two. Just because it is a strong system based on it's functionality and eliminating the demand for third party sites.
At least we can agree on this ^^
As for "throwing money at baddies" I'm not sure I know what you mean.
We have not seen RMAH in action yet so ofc there might be issues with it, but isn't it like that with everything that is new? Anyway I see the revenues blizzard is getting from RMAH as an incentive for them to keep it safe and effective. If there's cheating involved in some way Blizzard will have to put that on highest prio because of RM that is involved - most of it theirs ^^
You never get items for free - time is money =)
Quote from Jackzor
Bad luck for you. Not only did I rarely see bots, but when I reported them they were pretty quickly taken care of. Farming, and selling items for real money, is something that would happen either way. I fail to see how its at all game breaking now that Blizzard will hypothetically have much more control over the item trade.
Quote from Jackzor
Clearly you've never played WoW. Because the majority of what customer service does is answer and respond to complaints, most of which are about bots seeing as they made it extremely easy to report people. So their job is in large part banning bots/hackers.
As far as hacking, the only thing they'd ever be able to steal would be Blizzard currency that would only be able to be turned into cash if they hacked the relevant person's PayPal as well.
Quote from -Mephisto
Stop making it sound like Blizzard employe people whose sole task is to ban bots and hackers.
Quote from Groanan
Bits of code written to be run in conjunction with the game created by someone other than Blizzard.Just because Blizzard does not support addons for Diablo iii, doesn't mean none will exist.If it is untraceable, Diablo's version of Warden won't find it, and if there is website access, I doubt the Diii version of Warden will be running in the background at the time.Quote from Simpy7Addons = not existing in Diablo 3? Or maybe you mean a third party program?
Quote from Ferret
Quote from Rubarack
This is going to involve making up some numbers and those numbers are key to this issue.
Hmm.
By deductive reasoning skills, I have derived the following equation:
Make up some Numbers (x) = Numbers (x) are the key to this issue
As we know, X cancels out, so were left with... Make up some issue? I mean, you can't say you're gonna make something up and then base your whole conclusion why something is detriminal on that made up fact.
What do you think is going to happen once people meet their limit for free postings a week? People will be going crazy playing this game when it comes out, and find according levels of loot. It is in their best interest to post these on the gold AH once their RMT limit is reached without having to pay for further postings. That way, they can turn around next week and sell all the gold they made from those items as well. I mean, wouldn't it make more sense to sell 5 items for cash and have 10,000 gold to sell next week instead of just 5 items and nothing else? Everyone who posts more than the limit has to pay Blizzard upfront, and if that item doesn't sell...
Quote from professor_zim
Haven't read the above comments, maybe someone said it already.
If they introduce ever increasing tax on putting items to auction, that would prevent farming/botting. Say if there are 10 open bids, it would cost 11% of asked price to put 11th item, 12% for 12th etc, up to 100%. Or same, but on the daily basis, that would force acquiring multiple copies of the game, setting up multiple money accounts and would not generate any profit above some small amount. In other words, Blizzard could limit how much money an account could make per day.
What do you think?
0
0
0
0
35 Strength
52 Vitality
5% life
Critical Damage increase 53%
Critical Hit Chance increase 4%
C/o ends later tonight. It is the Fourth and I will be drunk, but this item will go to the highest bidder.
Bidding starts at 1 million
0
0
0
Armor:
sorry out of stock for the moment
Weapons:
sorry out of stock for the moment
2-handed
1-handed
Shields:
Message me if you catch me online, leave a post with your info, or add me if you like. My tag is Mindstain#1207.
0
0
"no more botting". I heard this same crap before the game came out. "Battle.net is like TOTALLY secure" there won't be any botting, gold glitching, or anything. The only thing I haven't heard about that I expected was glitching of the RMAH for real money. It'll prolly happen eventually though.
0
0
Ultimately, I would say that Vitality wins out. 5 resist all shouldn't b > 50 Vitality ( or 50 armor and 1750 health). I may be underestimating the value of resistance, which I know already that it's incredibly important to all classes in inferno. However, given the stated values, I'd say 50 vitality > 50 strength > 50 int > 50 dex.
0
0
Guess it just took me thinking I was talking to someone else. Maybe I did need a 5 minute timeout XD
1
Well you got me there. It hasn't been in development for 12 years, but people such as myself (who remember playing Double Dragon) have been waiting on it for about that long.
As to the swearing I am a little immature about it.... I'll admit. I like to swear and I don't care if people don't like it. I also don't care if that seems immature. It may not be the most effective method of getting my point across, but that dude is such a condescending prick in all of his posts. He just comes into a conversation and bestowes these simplistic and obviously idiotic little pearls before us swine. Here's an awesome thing that happens on the internets (and real life sometimes too)
person 1: I think XXXXX game is shitty
person 2: I don't think so
person 1: I think XXXXX game is shitty because I had a problem with it
person 2: I didn't have a problem it, it worked nicely for me
that conversation conveyed information and didn't involve either one of the person's acting superior to the other at all. Granted neither began cussing the other out but if person 2 had followed up with something like
person 2: I'm old and I think anyone with an opinion different from mine is a little child that I despise and I'm going to criticize multiple generations based on an opinion they have formed over the launch of the video game.
I would venture to say that that is not the most effective way for him to get his rather moot point across also. In the end, an opinion about a game is an opinion about a game. Everyone is entitled to one. Pretending that you have the end-all logic of elderness that makes your opinion superior to anyone elses is sheer elitism, and I don't like it and it makes me wanna cuss people. So I do.
0
wow.... just wow..... I'm being criticized for criticizing someone who is criticizing people for criticizing a game, and his final point is that cuss words make his "mature" mind shut down apparently. Too bad hypocrisy doesn't have the same effect. If I'm having a "tantrum" then are you going senile and about to ask me to reach into the hole in your pocket?