DiabloFans

Quote from "Cybercoco" »

So I guess that makes you a masochist? What other purpose could this asinine thread (and new bulletin to boot!) serve than to incite this garbage? What possible good could this have for this site or its community? I think a site admins need to have a little "heart to heart" with certain staff members around here. WTF is the matter with you?

And finally, who the hell gives a shit about what Adam Sessler has to say about anything?

Congratulations!

Quote from "Kenzai" »

What in the Hells Kwic, why dont you have the edit button???

I still do...

You could try reloading the page or something.


On-Topic:



It doesnt matter how 'old' those arguments are because people still dont seem to understand. Thus reposting them is good sometimes.

There very well IS WoW (or WC) influence in the greaphics of D3. You cant deny the fact that the models in the previous games were better in some way.
Actually they even kind of admitted some WoW influence, but unfortunately not in which aspect so it cant be used as proof for anything.

Also i think some people here have problems with understanding 'examples' or 'comparisons' properly. While the first person just said "Would you be happy if D3 had good gameplay and Pokemon graphics?", the second person is saying that D3 graphics arent like Pokemon.

BTW you kind of admit that D3 is cartoony when sayin "D3 isnt as cartoony as Pokemon."

(Im starting starting to think that your English is not very good because of your writing but maybe you wrote in a hurry. "... same level of cartoony that Pokemon uses." What in the Hells?)

Sorry for the OT parts of my post.

Quote from "JAZZ" »

Pretty fast?

More like really fast.

Faster then ludacris speed.

Quote from "mordrek" »

k, I never post, but people seem to miss the point he's trying to make.





The point is: In D2, everyone was always spamming pots.

To be able to raise the difficulty of the game the monsters you met HAD to kill you in one or two shots (or iron maiden or whatever) or your pot-factory would bring you instantly back to full health within a sec.

With less pot-spamming, they don't have to make the monsters as strong to make the game equally challenging.

Instead of having to insta-kill you , they can make you suffer, but still have a possibility of reacting and make a great comeback.

Quote from "waddlez" »

and if you get to the point where you are low, get better at the game noob

if you are a sorc you shouldn't be in the middle of people, you should be behind the barb that is tanking

if blizzard saw it as a problem they would go back to potion spamming, but I for one am glad I can focus on hitting left and right mouse button w/o tapping 1 2 3 4

Quote from "Kwic" »

I can't imagine fight without potions, but will see. But it wasn't so easy even you had the potions. Sometimes monster was so strong that it had you for 2 shots, and you were dead. I liked potions

Quote from "Enlyth" »

Apparently nothing, here is the ActionScript in the chatgem.swf: http://pastebin.com/f397c31ce

1. I clicked it so it was glowing, then scrolled my mouse all over the screen to see if any hidden image would pop up.
2. Opened diablo 2, clicked its chat gem, then clicked diablo3.com's chat gem to see if something would happen if they were both activated.

Quote from "Snowee" »

But wow that's amazing. It's a great guess that Diablo 3's coming out June 29th 2009. xD
:thumbsup:

Quote from "waddlez" »

could mean healthy as it, people won't go crazy with stress waiting for the game

all you can do is wait for lepzig and blizzcon, maybe they will have a sc2+d3 bundle pack, who knows

Quote from "liquid" »

Nothing against a holy warrior of some sort, I just hate the paladin. For no apparent reason really. I hated the way he runs, he looked ridiculous. Yeah, the reason for hating him is even more ridiculous but still... lol It's the only character I didn't enjoy playing with.
He always seemed unnecessary to me.