• 0

    posted a message on Thank you Blizzard!
    Quote from djonka
    If u enjoy this game then or obviously retarded sorry son ;) I tried to enjoy it believe me .... i tried so hard but naa :dead:
    Then you're not part of the Target Audience that this game is intended for, so please move along and find something else that you enjoy.
    Just because someone enjoys this game doesn't mean they are retarded. You need to get yourself evaluated if you think that mate.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on My thoughts about going beyond Reaper of Souls
    I have to agree with you, there is certainly a reason as to why there are those books in Pandemonium Fortress. It's unfortunate that Inarius views the Nephalem as abominations but liked humanity due to being mortal(?). If not in the next expansion, they might build to it for the one afterwards.
    Posted in: Lore & Storyline
  • 0

    posted a message on Crusader Build Question.
    Quote from dohnutzer

    Don't get me wrong but PC isn' the master race anymore. Multiplatfrom games sell like 100k copies on PC and then there are consoles with over 1 Mio copies meanwhile. depends on the game but the ratios are there :)

    btw. I play much more on pc than on cosoles
    Not denying the fact that Consoles sell more than PC, but PC Has been master race and still will be, just not because of game-sales. It's considered the master-race because of the customization, graphics, hardware interchangeability and what not.
    Posted in: Crusader: The Church of Zakarum
  • 0

    posted a message on Crusader Build Question.
    I wonder if it's Elective mode that you think is hindering your build playstyle? Enable that in the Options (I play on PS4 and PC) and you'll have just as much flexibility as other people do on PC.

    Must say that even with D3 on max on my PC, it feels nicer on console.

    But more so to your original question (LOL) give this build a shot until you get more of the Akkhans gear-set.
    http://www.diablofans.com/builds/1082-ultimate-synergetic-non-gear-dependant-holy-cause
    Posted in: Crusader: The Church of Zakarum
  • 0

    posted a message on Roland (new set)- yay or nay?
    I haven't been able to complete my Akkhans 6 piece (Currently sitting at 4) while my Rolands has gone straight to 5piece in one week. I've swapped to Rolands and using Shield Bash - I went from struggling in T2 to facerolling T4. It's great but yes, it is squishy. Akkhans is up generally whenever I'm facing elites and they all fall before it's down.

    http://us.battle.net/d3/en/profile/Lathium-1598/hero/51159010
    Posted in: Crusader: The Church of Zakarum
  • 0

    posted a message on Maybe a dumb question.
    A dumb question yes - but to be honest, I was expecting a less snarky reply from a forum mod as well.
    Posted in: Wizard: The Ancient Repositories
  • 0

    posted a message on Crusader Help and Critique thread. - Post Gear/Build queries here.
    http://us.battle.net/d3/en/profile/Lathium-1598/hero/51159010

    Hi there,
    Trying to farm up for an Akkhan's set but having no luck with shards or decent legendary drops in rifts. Any pointers as to what I should try to upgrade asap? Preferably going for a Fire build, but wouldn't mind rolling into Holy.

    I've been trying to find a decent 1-Hander for this buildbut haven't had any luck. Is it normal to lose roughly 100k dps when swapping from a 2hander to 1hander?
    Posted in: Crusader: The Church of Zakarum
  • 0

    posted a message on Reviving Diablo 3 in 2.2 patch or another expansion.
    Quote from shaggy
    Quote from Immoralthang

    Ever since Craptivision bought Blizzard all of their games have been casualized and mass produced.
    You do realize that in an interview, the three guys responsible for Diablo 1 stated that they were trying to create broader appeal for RPGs by focusing on combat and reducing what they viewed as unnecessary complexity, right?

    Saying that Diablo has been "casualized" is actually paying tribute to the original vision of the original developers and actually arguing that the current developers are keeping in-step with the general philosophy for the series that was established ~15 years ago in some dude's bedroom/garage. And I think this is precisely what Hans was talking about. Sure your opinion is valid, but it seems that you're just using that generic "I want to be angry at something so I'll lash out at people who can only play the game three hours per week" angst-y approach that just doesn't jive here.

    Casuals didn't ruin the genre. The genre was build around trying to appeal to people who enjoyed RPGs but couldn't be bothered with how tedious they had become.

    Completely agree with you there.
    To add on-to what you said... Not only that, but alot of people that play the game *are* indeed casuals - people to pick up games every now and then that do not have as much time to devote to it because of A) job, B ) education C) families and D) Life. Blizzard have done exceedingly well at trying to cater this game to 2 very different audiences. Nothing is perfect, and D3 does have it's flaws - but it's doing very well for what it is, and that is something that Blizzard does deserve credit with.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on End game content
    Start a new game in Adventure mode and farm bounties - Most people do these on normal difficulty for the sake of completing them fast. You obtain Rift Keystones from completing bounties which you can then use to open up Rifts. Basically these bounties and rifts enable a long process for you to be able to get your end-game gear set, and prepare you for higher torment levels.
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Roland's Legacy - Potential Build Discussion Thread
    That looks great. A different playstyle which is awesome. Like Pv3 said before, AC might be an option with this build - which is great for diversity.
    Posted in: Crusader: The Church of Zakarum
  • 0

    posted a message on 1-2 hours and we have our FIRST world paragon 1000
    To all the haters.


    Way to go and props for clan rep MMM. There'll always be haters - just let them do their thing. They can't effect you in the slightest ;) Atleast you're getting 'hated' on instead of doing the hating. Funny that eh? :P
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • 0

    posted a message on Upcoming meteor changes
    Quote from DGen

    Quote from Autocthon

    Meteor Shower isn't as random as people t5hink against targets with a decent hitbox. The delay is pretty much the only sticking point, but once again in a class where CC is solid making sure the hits line up shouldn't be a huge issue and if it is you're doing something wrong.

    The damage is... Well spenders for wizard suck on damage but the buffs aren't exactly small last I looked. Overall the damage is mediocre to good, and a fun skill is a fun skill.
    So if you are fighting something big, that doesn't move, that won't be dead by the time your meteors land, meteor shower as an ability works.
    So even in a solo instance where mobs should be targeting you - which is a situation where you should be kiting mobs, are you not able to predict where they'll go and place a meteor along that path? I down elites extremely fast with Meteor. Never had a problem with it.
    Posted in: Wizard: The Ancient Repositories
  • 0

    posted a message on Upcoming meteor changes
    Quote from DGen

    Quote from extrea666

    anyone already try fire meteor shower withThe Grand Vizier+ cindercoat ? very low cost for cast + alot of aoe dmg, even can be with firebird set.
    Not worth it. The abillity to spam a bad ability does not make a bad ability good. The delay + low damage + random nature of meteor shower makes it not worth using. One cast of Blizzard - Apocalypse deals the same damage as 3 meteor hits, in a gigantic aoe, so for trash clearing it beats meteor shower hands down. For single target, neither of them are worth picking up. So no matter how you spin it, meteor shower is not worth using, since there are (much) better alternatives.

    Meteor is still not worth using, and making it cost less AP does not fix that. Blizz should come up with some actually decent legendary affixes for meteor or buff it so it is actually worth using. Otherwise it will remain one of the abilities that should never be used.
    I've been loving my use of Meteor Shower since I got it.Mind you, I'm capped at 60... Is the differencethat noticeable at end-game?
    Posted in: Wizard: The Ancient Repositories
  • 0

    posted a message on New Expansion Leak for 3.0
    "Flood of Trolls"? Does no one else see the irony in this?
    Posted in: Diablo III General Discussion
  • To post a comment, please or register a new account.