You know what, screw English.Quote from "Valtonis" »that is just bullshit.
there is no such thing as a female monk.
the word monk in our reality is a gender specific term
women who are the equivalent of monks in eastern religions are called nuns
Sorry she doesn't have more cutting than the assassin. She's rather blunt.Quote from "Asus" »well at least she has more hair than the assassin ,and might (i hope) more cutter
Sounds like something you'd find in an terrible amateur anime MMO.Quote from "Ent1ty" »I think she should look more holy in a way lighter hair maybe even white y know get some rings of light aroudn her head or something just my opinion though.
As everyone knowsQuote from "FistOfZakarum" »She has better be at least visually muscled so i can believe that she has the monks speed.
Fury is in less supply but regenerates faster, that's how it is at the moment but it could change through development time. Mana regenerates slower but is much more plentiful.Quote from "Veltras" »
2- On a gameplay point of view, what is the difference between fury and mana?
Most of these questions have already been answered.Quote from "Anderonine" »Will we be re-visiting areas of Diablo 2?
Will Diablo 3 have achievements?
Will we be fighting against the forces of Heaven or allied with them?
Good job at contributing nothing post worthy. You "rere"Quote from "Teofill" »lol at your logic you rere
I can bet you both of my hands and feet that holding the alt button down extends the time of which items names are displayed.Quote from "Doppelganger" »I'm not arguing anything. I asked the question, he called us (me) a moron for not being able to read, that is not being able to read something that isn't in the news, like you say. I said he made it up (cause it isn't written or confirmed any fucking where), then he asked me to prove it. Its too retarded for words.
pressing alt every 5 seconds would be more damaging to your joints than holding it.Quote from "Romak" »Hmm... are you people just acting stupid or you really didn't understand that?
When an item drops, its name lasts for 5 seconds before fading away.
When pressing Alt (NOT holding), the 5 seconds + fade away feature will 'replay' on ALL items in the screen.
Need more time than 5 seconds? Press Alt again... it's still better than keeping your thumb on Alt 100% of the time.
I'm sick of people with reactions like:
Translation:
"I don't understand anything so I twist and deform the news instead of reading carefully and trying to understand, then say it's gonna be worse than ever because it's not exactly the same as Diablo 2. Booo!!"
Oh so since Bashiok didn't mention it, it automatically means it doesn't exist? Good logic.Quote from "Doppelganger" »Heh? I don't have to prove fucking anything.
You claim to read something that isn't there, well prove me it is there or shut the fuck up.
Prove me wrong.Quote from "Doppelganger" »Nope, no where does it say that holding down alt extends the time, you just made that up mister.
As I typed before, read what I wrote before you comment telling me to read what you wrote again.Quote from "SlappytheClown" »As I have said before Septar, please read what I write before commenting. I know what I have said. Also, there's another that says there can be male Amazons, so harp on him then too.
Please read your own posts before you tell me to read your posts.Quote from "SlappytheClown" »Please read what I say before you comment, I said change the name and keep the skills or change them a bit. Still capable of using javelins and certain bows. If the names changed, they can still be the same class as before, but with a different name...
You never typed that bullshit any where.Quote from "SlappytheClown" »Please read what I say before you comment, I said change the name and keep the skills or change them a bit. Still capable of using javelins and certain bows. If the names changed, they can still be the same class as before, but with a different name...
0
Apparently Diablofans is a hater of Freedom of Expression.
No surprise. This place went rapidly down the shitter after it actually got popular.
Hey Dauroth, when Diablo 3 is released, remember this thread and try to act surprised when you find out that I'm right.
0
Ok Mr. Metzen.
It's nice to know that you know the context Jay Wilson was speaking in despite not being present at the interview.
Not to mention, the key word that I mentioned in the post being ultimately
Diablo's coming back? The villain the entire series of games based in Sanctuary has focused on so far is coming back?
You must be psychic.
No, wait. You're not Chris Metzen, you're Jay Wilson! That explains everything.
0
The keyword here is Black Abyss, aka the place you're at when you're dead. A blank, seemingly infinite nothingness. Derp.
Further proof that you never read anybody's posts.
Keyword here is ultimately. That doesn't mean that Diablo is in the initial release of Diablo 3.
Plus that quote doesn't even prove that the demon you think is Diablo is actually him, which is the entire point of my posting in this thread.
0
It's really not that hard to pick up on. With the 2 lesser evils having emphasis put on them in this game, you really don't think they'd uncover them early on? It's called logic.
If you bothered reading Bashiok's posts (or anybody's for that matter) you'd see him often saying he has to ask Jay or somebody else to be able to answer a question, or to be corrected on something. Shows how involved he is with the game development, doesn't it? I don't feel like digging through his posts to find the specific posts I speak of, but they exist.
Under what circumstances are your evidences classified as "valid"? They're from official sources sure, but from ones that aren't involved with the game development itself. A quote from a game developer saying it is Diablo, the Lord of Terror would be significantly more credible, believable, and "valid" than the shitsmear that resembles text of which you decided to label as "evidence"
I'm not the one picking lame sources and calling it irrefutable evidence.
0
Scientific view?
Hahahaha :wallbash:
Oh jesus, that's funny and idiotic simultaneously, like a Judd Apatow film. Hey buddy, ever heard of Burden of Proof? Logical fallacy? You know? No, you clearly don't.
Do you honestly think the game developers give a shit about what goes on the website?
And what the hells are you going on with this blizzard employee and guessing shit? Is English your second language? Because that's the only excuse for such poor sentence structure.
You really think that they'd tell Bashiok who the big demon is at the end of the cinematic and tell him it's ok to reveal who it is even though if Diablo was returning it'd be a huge component of the plot?
Here, I'll tell you who it is. It's Belial. One of the designers decided as an in joke, they'd design Belial's body to be structured in a feminine way. To poke fun at how women are deceptive.
Happy? Don't believe me? Don't care.
Jesus, you guys just love jumping to conclusions based on paper thin "evidence"
Bashiok only knows what he's told. Like I said, if you had bothered to actually read.
If you guys want to be so scientific then the only thing you can claim to know is that Diablo is dead, and his soulstone destroyed. That is all you know for a fact. Everything else is sheer speculation, and to conclude otherwise is, as I mentioned previously, arrogant.
0
Do you have any idea how game development goes down? I'm going to assume no since you've drawn these conclusions from the sources you chose.
For one, the description of the statue wasn't even written by an employee involved with the Diablo 3 development. He was probably just shown the statue and was told to write up something about it.
And the music composer?
Really? Do you honestly think he is involved with the game development in depth enough to know whether or not that creature is actually Diablo? Guess what, he's not. In most cases music composers are told of what kind of music to compose and they do it, and the actual game developers listen to it and see if it's a fit. He might be shown clips(as is this case, for the D3 cinematic trailer music) and some concept art to get an idea of what to compose, otherwise he knows as much about the game and story as you do. So naturally, he thinks that the big mean monster at the end of the trailer is the big mean monster the game is named after. A foolish conclusion, but he's just composing music for it and not picking apart every follicle of the damn demon.
Give me a quote from Jay Wilson or Leonard Boyarsky confirming that the monster is Diablo, and you'll have a case.
I forgot about Bashiok.
Yeah, he's barely involved with game development too. He mostly just parrots what he's told from the actual game developers.
0
0
You can call the "main" boss of the game Diablo if you want but lore wise that's not the lord of terror.
0
0
You might find some other games set in Sanctuary, but they're not necessarily going to be primarily about stopping the invasion of hell.
Well, at least, not in the ARPG genre.
1
Get out.
The idiocy you just displayed in your post is astronomical.
0
Waiting for Diablo 3 in particular is a good thing. Adding a lot of content(unique items, loot and the like.) can take awhile, and the longer the game is in development, the more content you get out of the box.
Titan Quest was in development for 6 years. I have played through it on each difficulty about 5 times(15 complete playthroughs) and I was still finding epic and legendary weapons I didn't find before.
If just a week goes by after Diablo 3 releases and there's a database listing all the items in Diablo 3, then that would just be a disappointment.
0
You play Diablo 3 to pass the time don't you?
Nothing in Diablo 3 is really "worth your time" since you're probably playing Diablo 3 just to kill time.
Unless you're one of the people who does nothing but game.
0
Unless he has been honing his skills for 20 years(which he hasn't) he's clearly not going to be the best of fighters.
Not to mention he's 20 years older, and the demons have changed.
0
You're not serious?