There aren't any details yet on how this will work, but from the hints given it sounds like there will simply be no way to PvP in regular games, and players will have to join special PvP or Arena type games to fight head to head. (Old school Mking techniques, like leading dozens of monsters to trap waypoints, will presumably still be possible.) How does this make you feel? Better? Or worse?
Better game finding/joining tools.
Jay Wilson has talked about how the D2 style of lists of game names is sub-optimal. They want much better friend list contact options, and their dream system for D3 is a way for players in a game to agree to play another game together, and with some simple clicks it would be so. Hopefully this new implementation will encourage group play, rather than solo. Going solo may not be that easy anyway, once you've gone up a few difficulties. What's your opinion?
Sharing health globes
Every character within range will receive the benefits of a health globe when any other character activates (walks over) one. This includes (presumably) the non-hps benefits of a health globe, such as various skills that activate upon using them, mana recovery for the Witch Doctor, etc.
These are all features that most Diablo players welcome (well, except for the PKs) but you'll note that none of them are actually bonus benefits to playing in parties. (We're assuming that experience sharing will work something like it did in D2, though this has never been addressed by the D3 Team.) They're just removed disincentives to playing together. You don't get more item drops, or more health globes, by playing in a D3 party. You just don't have to worry about other players stealing your lewtz if they're quicker to the scene of the crime.
Will we see such party benefits in Diablo 3? Most of us were assuming so, but we know most of the skills in the game, and so far exactly one has a party benefit. It's the Barbarian's Battle Cry, which is basically Shout from D2, boosting the defense of everyone in the party. (While this will be a useful Barbarian skill, its utility as a party skill is uncertain, since Wizards and WDs aren't tanking, and will probably have such low defense that doubling it would mean nothing to them.)
There's nothing (yet) in D3 that works like the best party skills did in D2; no known skills will boost the party's hit points, damage, attack speed, resistances, etc. Nor are there any easily-activated debuffs that will hobble the monsters in fashion that's useful to everyone. The Witch Doctor has some mind control skills, but these work in a radius from the caster, so only affect monsters near the WD, and they don't make the monsters easier to kill as did Amplify Damage, Decrepify, Lower Resistance, etc. Furthermore, look at how they work. Horrify makes monsters run away from the WD; imagine your Wizard or Archer is standing on the edge of the screen; where are those monsters likely to run? Right at you, arriving just as the Horrify wears off. That's not a skill you're going to be real eager to see any WD casting in a party game.
Party Skills
Does Diablo 3 actually need party skills? Will players play together just because it's more fun in a group, and it's easier with a variety of damage types going at the monsters, and since no one's ninja-snatching all your drops anymore? Or do you want there to be skills coming from other players that actually improve your character, or debuff the monsters?
Jay Wilson changed the complexion of this issue when he broke the news that we will probably see Auras in Diablo 3, most likely as Monk skills. Auras, by definition, are party-benefiting skills, and could make the Monk the most popular MP character of all. But if the Monk has some awesome, Paladin-like auras, and none of the other characters can do anything for the party other than add damage; would that cause more problems than it cures? Would everyone post "LFG Monk!" notices, while freezing Witch Doctors out of party games since they can't add anything useful to the group?
It's too soon to predict, with more skills yet to be revealed, but it is surprising that with all the skills we've seen, none of them are clearly I want someone in my party using this? type abilities. Is the D3 team not thinking about party play yet? The multiplayer gameplay footage we've seen is all very "rat race" in style. Multiple characters racing to kill the fastest, without any sign of teamwork or cooperation. Is that their vision for Diablo 3?
Is that a vision you share?
(See the full article here at Diii.net. This was written by xXSoulXx and posted in his absence.)
As much as I enjoy pks, its just too easy to prevent them, and the case against them is too strong. Is it fundamentally wrong to kill an unsuspecting player who doesn't even want to fight? Yup. (Even if it is good for a laugh) Anyone who expects to be able to pk in D3 is fooling himself, I think.
Better group finding tools are an obvious improvement. I really don't want to see a game that ever requires a group though. One thing I always loved about D2 is that you could complete the entire game solo if you wanted. Yeah its not the fastest way but its nowhere near impossible either. Some might enjoy the challenge, even. You can always join a group if there is a particular boss you're having trouble with or if you just want to play with a few friends. I like the transition in D2 between solo and group play. There's no limitations, any part of the game can be completed on your own or with a few teammates, depending on what kind of mood you're in at the time.
I really hate in WoW how all of the best quests and most exciting instances require a group. Honestly I spend as much time trying to get a group together as I do killing monsters and completing quests. Half the time I have to compromise and run an instance I don't really want to just for the sake of being in a group. I don't want to have to wait for peak gaming hours to complete any quest in D3, I'd still like the option to solo it if I choose to, even if it is more challenging. Has there been anything official about offline or network play in D3, or is everything going to be on bnet 2.0?
Maybe I'm just a little down on parties, but I don't know if I like the idea of giving the monk auras. Like Seth is suggesting, by giving only one class a powerful party buff, that class could be in disproportionally high demand for partying. If the monk is going to have powerful auras, then I think the game would be more fun if the other classes also had something to bring to the table.
There could be a lot of really cool ways to make party play feel more like you're working together, or synergistic. Imagine a barb picking up a monk and heaving him into the middle of a large group of demons where he starts whooping ass. Okay maybe that sounds a little gay but you get the idea. It could be a female monk if that makes any difference. At least giving every class some type of party friendly ability like auras, shouts, curses, etc might make a party feel a little less like there is half a dozen people soloing within close proximity of each other and more like you're helping each other.
Well I'm one of the biggest advocates for PvP in the world - but in Diablo I don't really see a place for it. It's more of an RPG than an MMORPG and normally when I play D2 i'm content with hack slashing, taking a break, looking at my gear etc. The element of surprise or having to be on your guard all the time is something I LOVE! but don't mind that restricted to PvP heavy MMO's.
I also noticed that the gameplay always seemed like a "rat race". I always loved how in TCP/ICP games with a lot of people, everyone seemed to go for party skills because they were fun. The barbarian has all of his shouts, the necromancer has bone walls (and summons I guess), as well as curses mentioned in the post. The sorceress has lots of AOEs, and it just seems like everyone in D2 could help each other. In what I've seen from D3 so far it seems like everyone is just unloading all of their attacks for damage rather than party strategy, which was a big part of D2, in my opinion. However, not all of the skills have been unveiled, so as far as we know there could be a ton of party skills waiting.
I'm really glad they are improving group finding tools, that is something I always thought WoW did a better job at than D2.
Finally PvP as it should be, worlds where its prevented, and worlds where you can dive right into it if you want. The OPTION and the ability to be SAFE when you want a normal game with others.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Nobody can go back and start a new beginning, but anyone can start today and make a new ending.
On the subject of the auras i think that it is gonna make some difficulties if the monk is the only one that can give party buffs (minus the barb) But i think that if the witches doctors summons function well enough like the necro's summons then a summon build could be a tank. Wizard... well even D2 it didnt give any bonus auras yet they were the second most popular class because they were able to deal out great damage and rush through things quickly. Most likely the wizard in d3 will be able to do the same thing and dish out good damage but i cant remember if they can teleport or not someone can say somethin bout that.
Wow, no gank and run, what an awful game. If any Blizzard reps read this forum...please take this advice!
DO NOT NAME THIS GAME DIABLO 3!!
Just let the Diablo series fade out of existence and die a glorious death with Diablo 2. You had a forumula that was a huge success and massively popular, and seem to think yanking the bread and butter out of the series is improving it? How much did Diablo 2 outsell Guild Wars, yet D3 seems more like Guild Wars then Diablo, why?
Wow, no gank and run, what an awful game. If any Blizzard reps read this forum...please take this advice!
DO NOT NAME THIS GAME DIABLO 3!!
Just let the Diablo series fade out of existence and die a glorious death with Diablo 2. You had a forumula that was a huge success and massively popular, and seem to think yanking the bread and butter out of the series is improving it? How much did Diablo 2 outsell Guild Wars, yet D3 seems more like Guild Wars then Diablo, why?
I disagree.. I, (and i'm sure a massive amount of people would agree) really have a fond hatred towards random players killing both me and my friend, while we are simply trying to do a quest.. it takes ages to get far without teleport, and to have someone come in and erase our process through a dungeon, really put off both of us from playing. :mad:
PKing does indeed suck. Although it's funny to destroy a level 7 newby..it's jsut wrong and idiotic.
I hate the idea of health globes to begin with. I mean, a monster can logically carry around a potion..but how the fuck could one drop a goddamn GLOBE? I mean..do those monsters just really dig shoving stuff up their asses, which then magically drop when they're dead? I know it's not a realistic game, but it would be nice if it had SOME kind of reality in it (i.e the tetris inventory).
I also dislike the fact that there won't be synergies..instead of butchering the entire concept altogether..FIX it..they're going all out on fixing shit that SHOULDN'T be fixed, and cutting out the things that SHOULD be fixed, out of the game. What the heck man? Yeah synergies rendered some builds useless..but is it that hard to fix? They keep blabbing on and on and on and on about fixing stuff that everybody likes, and ruining them in the process..instead of just fixing stuff that can potentially be great additions.
Me personally have always played Diablo games completley solo over and over again. I like it that way so "party"-effect is nothing I think of.
I can see the problem, but if there is any problems.. I hope the people that like the party-aura-effect-thingy should really make their voice heard when its time for Blizzard to add those changes, in logic the party auras is something that comes AFTER all the skills have set in motion and are finished!
Getting ganked and getting angry about it, was fun to me, I loved getting jumped by a player and coming back and beating them down. I also loved getting pwned and camped so bad I'd have to leave the game.
If you're going to take gankability away from me. Then please just do a Normal Mode and PvP Mode type of deal. I have been satisfied with most of Diablo's new developments, but if I have to step in a stupid Arena to fight every time. I will be thoroughly dissapointed.
It takes so much away from the, "OMFG I HATE YOU DIE!!" type of stuff and makes it into this circumcised sportsmanship without any edge.
Partying is terrible. It requires people, and a population to be just right. It makes people start choosing classes based on how easy it is to get groups. How lame... Just make everyone badasses, and when they combine they are a clusterfuck of badassery. That's more fun.
I will put my opnion on every subject, one by one:
No non-consensual PvP (No Pking.) As I said in other threads, PK is a very very good feature to a game, but also a very complicated one. To a Pk system works the game must be a mmorpg with a fixed world, and a mmorpg centered appon world pvp, wich is not D3's case.
People that want to avoid PK will simply isolate then in private games wich is very troublesome since the game is suppose to be coop.
No PKing is a 100% natural and right choice from blizz.
Better game finding/joining tools. I've not much to say about this. It's certainly good news
Sharing health globes
This is another really natural and even obvious choice. If HO weren't shareble people on party would pass more time fightning for the damn globes then cooping.
Party Skills I think party skills should exist in a small quantity in every class. Like barbarian have 1 or 2 shourts, monks have 1~2 auras, doctors have some debuffs and wizard have some buffs.
This way you can specialize your build a little more. You can choose to make a char more centered on soloing, or make ir more centered on partying and for me build diversity is allways fun. Also, the possibility of some class synergies arise is good. Stuff like stack necro with LR+conviction pally+any kind of sorcs is really fun in D2.
About the way D3 is right now, i don't think it is a good parameter. Stuff aren't balanced right now. They are at a creation process, thats why many gameplay elements aren't organized and balanced. We have to wait alot more to judge those very spcific gameplay elements.
The PvP thing just means the shit talk on Bnet is gonna reach a whole new high. Which is gonna lead true duelers and PK'ers to just find new ways to abuse people...which works for everyone.
Pking - should have a way to separate the ppl that want it and the ppl who don't. Maybe something like US-East PVP and US-East PVE. Cause when i start playing d3 i don't want to listen to ppl bitch. Just make every one happy.
Better Joining tools - Win!
Sharing Globes - iffy.. So one orb heals for 100 hp split between the number of players near by? Or 100 hp to each player... or maybe random ownership some what like the way items was split in Dungeon Siege?
Party buffs - there will always be favored classes imo. But i doubt ne class will be unwanted over the next. That Blizz would fix that.
a monster can logically carry around a potion..but how the fuck could one drop a goddamn GLOBE? I mean..do those monsters just really dig shoving stuff up their asses, which then magically drop when they're dead? I know it's not a realistic game, but it would be nice if it had SOME kind of reality in it (i.e the tetris inventory).
I agree.. it isn't realistic at all. The first time i heard the mechanic, i was quite puzzled. I tried to fit some sort of logic behind it.. such as yourself and others in possession of a spell or passive aura that materializes life force, but sadly blizzard hasn't really thought that far i guess.
But hey, it might work, i mean look at god of war. thats epic and there's globes flying around everywhere. Also, WTH is the deal with magical med-packs? you can't fix everything with it :P. Oh and in zelda.. how the hell does a levitating heart heal you? I guess in essence we're questioning the existence of the healing mechanic in comparison to reality, but when it all comes down to it, wouldn't you much rather eat a levitating globe to stay in the action instead of falling to the ground with broken ribs?
If you're going to take gankability away from me. Then please just do a Normal Mode and PvP Mode type of deal. I have been satisfied with most of Diablo's new developments, but if I have to step in a stupid Arena to fight every time. I will be thoroughly dissapointed.
I agree with this concept; indeed going into an "arena" would be quite irritating. The option for ganking to occur should be one of the options when creating a game (hopefully with the addition of different options to alter the style of PvP, ie, in detail) would be sweet.
I hate the idea of health globes to begin with. I mean, a monster can logically carry around a potion..but how the fuck could one drop a goddamn GLOBE? I mean..do those monsters just really dig shoving stuff up their asses, which then magically drop when they're dead? I know it's not a realistic game, but it would be nice if it had SOME kind of reality in it (i.e the tetris inventory).
And how in d2 a small bird can drop an armor ?
The health globe is not to improve realist of game but improve gameplay...
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
There aren't any details yet on how this will work, but from the hints given it sounds like there will simply be no way to PvP in regular games, and players will have to join special PvP or Arena type games to fight head to head. (Old school Mking techniques, like leading dozens of monsters to trap waypoints, will presumably still be possible.) How does this make you feel? Better? Or worse?
Better game finding/joining tools.
Jay Wilson has talked about how the D2 style of lists of game names is sub-optimal. They want much better friend list contact options, and their dream system for D3 is a way for players in a game to agree to play another game together, and with some simple clicks it would be so. Hopefully this new implementation will encourage group play, rather than solo. Going solo may not be that easy anyway, once you've gone up a few difficulties. What's your opinion?
Sharing health globes
Every character within range will receive the benefits of a health globe when any other character activates (walks over) one. This includes (presumably) the non-hps benefits of a health globe, such as various skills that activate upon using them, mana recovery for the Witch Doctor, etc.
These are all features that most Diablo players welcome (well, except for the PKs) but you'll note that none of them are actually bonus benefits to playing in parties. (We're assuming that experience sharing will work something like it did in D2, though this has never been addressed by the D3 Team.) They're just removed disincentives to playing together. You don't get more item drops, or more health globes, by playing in a D3 party. You just don't have to worry about other players stealing your lewtz if they're quicker to the scene of the crime.
Will we see such party benefits in Diablo 3? Most of us were assuming so, but we know most of the skills in the game, and so far exactly one has a party benefit. It's the Barbarian's Battle Cry, which is basically Shout from D2, boosting the defense of everyone in the party. (While this will be a useful Barbarian skill, its utility as a party skill is uncertain, since Wizards and WDs aren't tanking, and will probably have such low defense that doubling it would mean nothing to them.)
There's nothing (yet) in D3 that works like the best party skills did in D2; no known skills will boost the party's hit points, damage, attack speed, resistances, etc. Nor are there any easily-activated debuffs that will hobble the monsters in fashion that's useful to everyone. The Witch Doctor has some mind control skills, but these work in a radius from the caster, so only affect monsters near the WD, and they don't make the monsters easier to kill as did Amplify Damage, Decrepify, Lower Resistance, etc. Furthermore, look at how they work. Horrify makes monsters run away from the WD; imagine your Wizard or Archer is standing on the edge of the screen; where are those monsters likely to run? Right at you, arriving just as the Horrify wears off. That's not a skill you're going to be real eager to see any WD casting in a party game.
Party Skills
Does Diablo 3 actually need party skills? Will players play together just because it's more fun in a group, and it's easier with a variety of damage types going at the monsters, and since no one's ninja-snatching all your drops anymore? Or do you want there to be skills coming from other players that actually improve your character, or debuff the monsters?
Jay Wilson changed the complexion of this issue when he broke the news that we will probably see Auras in Diablo 3, most likely as Monk skills. Auras, by definition, are party-benefiting skills, and could make the Monk the most popular MP character of all. But if the Monk has some awesome, Paladin-like auras, and none of the other characters can do anything for the party other than add damage; would that cause more problems than it cures? Would everyone post "LFG Monk!" notices, while freezing Witch Doctors out of party games since they can't add anything useful to the group?
It's too soon to predict, with more skills yet to be revealed, but it is surprising that with all the skills we've seen, none of them are clearly I want someone in my party using this? type abilities. Is the D3 team not thinking about party play yet? The multiplayer gameplay footage we've seen is all very "rat race" in style. Multiple characters racing to kill the fastest, without any sign of teamwork or cooperation. Is that their vision for Diablo 3?
Is that a vision you share?
(See the full article here at Diii.net. This was written by xXSoulXx and posted in his absence.)
Better group finding tools are an obvious improvement. I really don't want to see a game that ever requires a group though. One thing I always loved about D2 is that you could complete the entire game solo if you wanted. Yeah its not the fastest way but its nowhere near impossible either. Some might enjoy the challenge, even. You can always join a group if there is a particular boss you're having trouble with or if you just want to play with a few friends. I like the transition in D2 between solo and group play. There's no limitations, any part of the game can be completed on your own or with a few teammates, depending on what kind of mood you're in at the time.
I really hate in WoW how all of the best quests and most exciting instances require a group. Honestly I spend as much time trying to get a group together as I do killing monsters and completing quests. Half the time I have to compromise and run an instance I don't really want to just for the sake of being in a group. I don't want to have to wait for peak gaming hours to complete any quest in D3, I'd still like the option to solo it if I choose to, even if it is more challenging. Has there been anything official about offline or network play in D3, or is everything going to be on bnet 2.0?
Maybe I'm just a little down on parties, but I don't know if I like the idea of giving the monk auras. Like Seth is suggesting, by giving only one class a powerful party buff, that class could be in disproportionally high demand for partying. If the monk is going to have powerful auras, then I think the game would be more fun if the other classes also had something to bring to the table.
There could be a lot of really cool ways to make party play feel more like you're working together, or synergistic. Imagine a barb picking up a monk and heaving him into the middle of a large group of demons where he starts whooping ass. Okay maybe that sounds a little gay but you get the idea. It could be a female monk if that makes any difference. At least giving every class some type of party friendly ability like auras, shouts, curses, etc might make a party feel a little less like there is half a dozen people soloing within close proximity of each other and more like you're helping each other.
I'm really glad they are improving group finding tools, that is something I always thought WoW did a better job at than D2.
DO NOT NAME THIS GAME DIABLO 3!!
Just let the Diablo series fade out of existence and die a glorious death with Diablo 2. You had a forumula that was a huge success and massively popular, and seem to think yanking the bread and butter out of the series is improving it? How much did Diablo 2 outsell Guild Wars, yet D3 seems more like Guild Wars then Diablo, why?
I disagree.. I, (and i'm sure a massive amount of people would agree) really have a fond hatred towards random players killing both me and my friend, while we are simply trying to do a quest.. it takes ages to get far without teleport, and to have someone come in and erase our process through a dungeon, really put off both of us from playing. :mad:
I hate the idea of health globes to begin with. I mean, a monster can logically carry around a potion..but how the fuck could one drop a goddamn GLOBE? I mean..do those monsters just really dig shoving stuff up their asses, which then magically drop when they're dead? I know it's not a realistic game, but it would be nice if it had SOME kind of reality in it (i.e the tetris inventory).
I also dislike the fact that there won't be synergies..instead of butchering the entire concept altogether..FIX it..they're going all out on fixing shit that SHOULDN'T be fixed, and cutting out the things that SHOULD be fixed, out of the game. What the heck man? Yeah synergies rendered some builds useless..but is it that hard to fix? They keep blabbing on and on and on and on about fixing stuff that everybody likes, and ruining them in the process..instead of just fixing stuff that can potentially be great additions.
Man, I is not in a good mood.
Rise and rise again, until lambs become lions
I can see the problem, but if there is any problems.. I hope the people that like the party-aura-effect-thingy should really make their voice heard when its time for Blizzard to add those changes, in logic the party auras is something that comes AFTER all the skills have set in motion and are finished!
:: Enkeria [Twitter / Twitch / Website / Tattoos]
If you're going to take gankability away from me. Then please just do a Normal Mode and PvP Mode type of deal. I have been satisfied with most of Diablo's new developments, but if I have to step in a stupid Arena to fight every time. I will be thoroughly dissapointed.
It takes so much away from the, "OMFG I HATE YOU DIE!!" type of stuff and makes it into this circumcised sportsmanship without any edge.
Partying is terrible. It requires people, and a population to be just right. It makes people start choosing classes based on how easy it is to get groups. How lame... Just make everyone badasses, and when they combine they are a clusterfuck of badassery. That's more fun.
No non-consensual PvP (No Pking.)
As I said in other threads, PK is a very very good feature to a game, but also a very complicated one. To a Pk system works the game must be a mmorpg with a fixed world, and a mmorpg centered appon world pvp, wich is not D3's case.
People that want to avoid PK will simply isolate then in private games wich is very troublesome since the game is suppose to be coop.
No PKing is a 100% natural and right choice from blizz.
Better game finding/joining tools.
I've not much to say about this. It's certainly good news
Sharing health globes
This is another really natural and even obvious choice. If HO weren't shareble people on party would pass more time fightning for the damn globes then cooping.
Party Skills
I think party skills should exist in a small quantity in every class. Like barbarian have 1 or 2 shourts, monks have 1~2 auras, doctors have some debuffs and wizard have some buffs.
This way you can specialize your build a little more. You can choose to make a char more centered on soloing, or make ir more centered on partying and for me build diversity is allways fun. Also, the possibility of some class synergies arise is good. Stuff like stack necro with LR+conviction pally+any kind of sorcs is really fun in D2.
About the way D3 is right now, i don't think it is a good parameter. Stuff aren't balanced right now. They are at a creation process, thats why many gameplay elements aren't organized and balanced. We have to wait alot more to judge those very spcific gameplay elements.
Pking - should have a way to separate the ppl that want it and the ppl who don't. Maybe something like US-East PVP and US-East PVE. Cause when i start playing d3 i don't want to listen to ppl bitch. Just make every one happy.
Better Joining tools - Win!
Sharing Globes - iffy.. So one orb heals for 100 hp split between the number of players near by? Or 100 hp to each player... or maybe random ownership some what like the way items was split in Dungeon Siege?
Party buffs - there will always be favored classes imo. But i doubt ne class will be unwanted over the next. That Blizz would fix that.
Lets just wait and see. =)
ty
I agree.. it isn't realistic at all. The first time i heard the mechanic, i was quite puzzled. I tried to fit some sort of logic behind it.. such as yourself and others in possession of a spell or passive aura that materializes life force, but sadly blizzard hasn't really thought that far i guess.
But hey, it might work, i mean look at god of war. thats epic and there's globes flying around everywhere. Also, WTH is the deal with magical med-packs? you can't fix everything with it :P. Oh and in zelda.. how the hell does a levitating heart heal you? I guess in essence we're questioning the existence of the healing mechanic in comparison to reality, but when it all comes down to it, wouldn't you much rather eat a levitating globe to stay in the action instead of falling to the ground with broken ribs?
though... the ribs idea would be awesome.
I agree with this concept; indeed going into an "arena" would be quite irritating. The option for ganking to occur should be one of the options when creating a game (hopefully with the addition of different options to alter the style of PvP, ie, in detail) would be sweet.
And how in d2 a small bird can drop an armor ?
The health globe is not to improve realist of game but improve gameplay...