Jesus, I've taken on five at one time in es mod but there was way more maggots than that. I can hardly imagine trying to take on an army of those things. They would freeze you still and pierce you from all sides with their giant sickles
See the contradiction there? Your bias comment is mute
Mephisto devised the takeover of the Sanctuary operation, Mephisto commanded the other two Primes to fufill their roles (Baal pending), Mephisto served as the first defense of the operation.
From the statement above, its easy to tell that Mephisto is the tactician and more defining, cunning. As for your Mephisto + Baal = Diablo, how can you make that remark. Let me define Destruction, Hated, and Terror for you:
When you are scared, what do you do as a human reaction: you turn submissive toward the fear. When you are angry, what do you do as a human reaction: You direct the hate toward yourself and/or others
Now, what would you as a commander of armies have: Submissive warriors, or anger purposeful soldiers? I would say that most commanders would choose the anger side rather than the fear side
Anyways, what does this have to do with Mephisto, Diablo, and Baal? The passages above state that Hatred is stronger that Terror in certain scenarios, Of course Terror beats Hatred is other scenarios too. I have just contradicted myself, but I have also opened up another point: Hatred and Terror cannot be compared, Destruction is pending, BUT I believe that Hatred surpasses Terror in the Diablo Universe plot
Perhaps you forgot the title of this thread, who is the most evil, that has nothing to do with who would win in the fight. Diablo is clearly stronger in the game. Thats not bias thats fact. I'd hate to bring this up but Diablo is who the games are named after.
BTW I just had a creepy thought. What if those maggots that popped out of Duriel were infant Duriels?
There are some key differences legs, head size, teeth, duriel is like 3x the size.... but yea, they have a similar design. Duriel would kick a hydralisks ass no problem though.
We have yet to distinguish Duriel's past, maybe he was supposed to be the fourth prime evil but they disowned him because he was a big blithering idiot
So Lilith is a semiprime evil? I haven't read the sin war trilogy ><. If we are talking in traditional terms I'd say that the Price of Pain is the most evil. Hate? meh. Destruction? meh. Terror? meh. But Pain? That is something real, something that destroys the mind and the body. There is no better way to persuade.
Are the Prime Evils the spawn of Lilith? I don't think its stated anywhere, but she is the mother of all demons. She also revived them for the pandemonium event, I think it was an act of compassion on her part. So in that case Lilith would be the most evil.
Yes I'm pretty sure we can ALL turn a christian church to worship Satan, as you have rightfully stated. Diablo couldnt fully corrupt 1 deeply religous person, where Mephisto on the other hand, corrupted the inhabitants including the high priests, priests, and other deeply religous folk AKA Zakarum except for one, Khalim
Yea, its pretty easy for the Prime Evils.
But you see I will win this convo cause I'm not biased towards one evil, as your avatar clearly shows. Maybe Diablo cant corrupt people as well as Mephisto, but there is no doubt in my mind that Diablo could kick his skinny skeleton ass. He mobilized the takeover of sanctuary with only a fragment of soulstone to his name. Baal on the other hand is only good at making war. Diablo is equal parts Baal and Mephisto, so he is either equal or better (the sum is greater than the parts).
Mephisto is good at corrupting people with hate.
Baal is good at destroying things.
Diablo is decent at both, which makes him terrifying.
How in the fucking world did you arrive at that conclusion. Mephisto corrupted A WHOLE RELEGION-BASED POPULATION BENT ON THE LIGHT, THE ZAKARUM, thats about a whole population of King Leorics right there, and Diablo couldn't fully corrupt King Leoric.
and Mephisto couldn't corrupt khalim so... some people cant be corrupted, that doesn't mean that the majority of people aren't easy to corrupt. Corruption is easy to perform on those who have nothing. Show them what they desire and offer them a choice. Is that so hard?:rolleyes:
Diablo seeded 3 acts with demons, and corrupt shit, 2 of which he was in a lesser form.
Mephisto took over one city of easily people (people are inherently easy to corrupt).
Baal took a Arreat Summit and corrupted the Worldstone.
What is the most effective on the battlefield? Hate, Terror, or Destruction? I would say all of the above. Hate can be used as fuel to drive a war, Terror can wane the courage of you're opponents, and Destruction is pretty self explanatory.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
BTW I just had a creepy thought. What if those maggots that popped out of Duriel were infant Duriels?
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
I always thought Duriel had the best corpse:)
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
But you see I will win this convo cause I'm not biased towards one evil, as your avatar clearly shows. Maybe Diablo cant corrupt people as well as Mephisto, but there is no doubt in my mind that Diablo could kick his skinny skeleton ass. He mobilized the takeover of sanctuary with only a fragment of soulstone to his name. Baal on the other hand is only good at making war. Diablo is equal parts Baal and Mephisto, so he is either equal or better (the sum is greater than the parts).
Mephisto is good at corrupting people with hate.
Baal is good at destroying things.
Diablo is decent at both, which makes him terrifying.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
Mephisto took over one city of easily people (people are inherently easy to corrupt).
Baal took a Arreat Summit and corrupted the Worldstone.
Diablo spread terror.
Mephisto spread hate.
Baal spread destruction.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.