Well, you are just a 3D lover, we can stop there, you prefer choppy polygons and shiny plasticy effects with low-rez textures to 2D, and that is beyond my understanding.
We weren't talking about my notebook. It's very old. That wasn't my point, again. If you can't even see my point, you are just stupid.
You're really negative about this Equinox, since the beginning you have been doubting the visual quality of SC2. Lets work on being a bit more positive and uplifting, instead of calling 13-year olds stupid. (Even if they are and don't know it:D:D:D:D:D:D:):):):):))
WC3 was their first 3d game, and also it looked good for that time. Say what you will about it now, but when it came out the graphics were really good.
Not true, I could never stop thinking "the graphics suck" while playing WC3... :rolleyes: And I play SC1 on the tiny resolution and I love it... in 3D, the Zerg would never be the same...
To Carloserus - you can't polish 3D. SC2 is low-polygon and it will stay so in order to allow enough units. Blizzard doesn't have a guy like Carmack to optimize it so that they can have good 3D and good speed.
They are Blizzard. I'm sure they can give us something that looks awesome. WoW is different because its a MMO, which means that they need millions of people that can run it in the first place. In that they succeeded, because my comp is clearly not meant for that kind of game, but somehow still manages.
You're really negative about this Equinox, since the beginning you have been doubting the visual quality of SC2. Lets work on being a bit more positive and uplifting, instead of calling 13-year olds stupid. (Even if they are and don't know it:D:D:D:D:D:D:):):):):))
They are Blizzard. I'm sure they can give us something that looks awesome. WoW is different because its a MMO, which means that they need millions of people that can run it in the first place. In that they succeeded, because my comp is clearly not meant for that kind of game, but somehow still manages.
and yes, im back.