can we get off of graphics and storylines, save that for other threads/polls
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
graphics wise im cool pretty much either way Iso or 3D, so long as the 3D isnt WOW 3D. but im definitely pro rpg
Isometric and rpg (D2) = good
3D and rpg (like NWN) = good
isometric and mmoprg = bad
3D and mmorpg (like WOW) = evil
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
yes we all want another cow level but that is a point for another thread
oldskool over WC 3d
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
yes quite.
most of us know that the isometric view of the diablo series (and most DND computer games) is actually 3D, but for clarity i always just called it isometric.
and yep having D3 with WOW graphics would suck, but it will probably be in 3D (full), not many games that come out now arent full 3D, like WOW, NWN, dungeon siege, Guild wars and the like.
personally i would prefer D3 to be in the oldskool isometric view of the previous diablo titles, but if it is in 3D, i hope it isnt like WOW
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
yeh, that would be good, downside not a lot of comps will be able to handle it.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
yeh, but hey its not like im this guy who what ever he says is fact, just 99.9% what i say if fact, lol
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
now with 3D there areany stylings, World of Warcraft, Neverwinter nights, Heroes of might and magic 5, age of empires 3,
all of these with the exception of WOW, would be very good for diablo. but i would prefer the oldskool isometric view of the previous diablo titles
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
yeh but thats pretty hard, technically all graphics is a cartoon(just thought i would say it before someone else does), there is cartoony (WOW) and less cartoony (NWN), looking at the chars with wow they look very superimposed on to the background (like the werebear in LOD), while with other games less so eg NWN
i would prefer oldskool over 3D.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
i dont want the diablo series ruined by having a game with the wow graphics, the diablo series has always been ahead of its time(at the time of release), wow isnt the best graphics out there, but to answer the question of this poll, oldskool over WC 3D graphics
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
oldskool over warcraft 3D
actually oldskool over most 3D graphic stylings
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
great point, bet your the only one here to say that.
we have all be waiting, why do you think we make posts on a website dedicated to the third game when it havent even been confirmed yet
oh and oldskool all the way
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
and yeh oldskool all the way, over warcraft 3D that is
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Isometric and rpg (D2) = good
3D and rpg (like NWN) = good
isometric and mmoprg = bad
3D and mmorpg (like WOW) = evil
oldskool over WC 3d
most of us know that the isometric view of the diablo series (and most DND computer games) is actually 3D, but for clarity i always just called it isometric.
and yep having D3 with WOW graphics would suck, but it will probably be in 3D (full), not many games that come out now arent full 3D, like WOW, NWN, dungeon siege, Guild wars and the like.
personally i would prefer D3 to be in the oldskool isometric view of the previous diablo titles, but if it is in 3D, i hope it isnt like WOW
all of these with the exception of WOW, would be very good for diablo. but i would prefer the oldskool isometric view of the previous diablo titles
i would prefer oldskool over 3D.
oldskool over warcraft 3D
actually oldskool over most 3D graphic stylings
we have all be waiting, why do you think we make posts on a website dedicated to the third game when it havent even been confirmed yet
oh and oldskool all the way
and yeh oldskool all the way, over warcraft 3D that is