Try jacking your resolution to the lowest setting possible, which is like 800x600. Fixed it for me.
didi it it works on most places, but act 2 has a lot of demending areas, that dosen't run fluently on my computer (Dalgur Oasis, Sewers, archives, vault of the assassins)
Funny, right at the part where act 2 starts to get difficult, coincidence?
i Prefer Amd than Intel...and if ure making to economy its for sure the best option..u can pic an Bulldozer octacore its way better than I5 and cheaper...and a AMD videocard too HD6950...its better than gtx560 and cheaper too
What is wrong with ppl, you do realise D3 zones load instantly....SSD's lol.
SSD is really not worth it, spare a few seconds on windows load and nothing on D3 loading...hahah.
What exactly did I say wrong? Only thing SSD's do is reduce loading time right? Especially if we are talking Diablo 3. I have played the beta, game loads almost instantly.
Seeing as this is about a pc being built on a budget for D3 a SSD is pointless. Nothing /facepalm about that.
yeh, go for a bit higher cpu (i5 2500) and drop the ram to 4gb. D3 will run maxed out on the cpu you have chosen as well, just cpu speed is better than an extra 4gig of ram you do not need.
Also, what PSU is in the case?
D3 will run maxed out on a lower gfx, like a 460 or a 5850 even. If you have budget constraints and wanna build a pc for d3 that is.
With your setup, and even much lower graphics card as that you will be able to run it maxed out smoothly. D3 does not take a lot of power from a pc. It does not even have ultra mode like sc2
first, don't make a post with a title such as it is, since you have no evidence towards it.
second, it's only been in development for a little over 4 years, about 4 1/2. Not 8.
third, all this 'cutting and chopping' happens with EVERY game they have made. The difference is they are trying something new by letting us in slightly more with their development process. Every game they've ever made has had features proposed for it, tried out and cut. We just get to see it this time, and not *only* the finished product. And the way people like you act towards it makes me think they won't let us in again, too many people make threads like this and rage without knowing what they are talking about.
You are completely wrong, it has not only been in development for 4-4.5 years.
Jay said at last year's blizcon in an interview "when i came on as project leader 6 years ago, blah blah blah" The game was already into development when he came on as project leader. Even if it started the moment he arrived (which it didnt) it is already 6.5 years. You are completely and utterly wrong. I do not get where you people actually get 4 - 4.5 years. The game was announced 4 years ago, gameplay videos / screenshots were already shown at that time.
Sigh at you.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I know the feel!
So many times this ! I love this game and play it regurarly
Otherwise i call BS. He is just a glass cannon nerd raging about the nerf, making up stories.
There is not hardcore RMAH.
There we go, problem solved, nothing to see here move along.
Funny, right at the part where act 2 starts to get difficult, coincidence?
Im doing it as i type this...Lets all just masturbate.
What exactly did I say wrong? Only thing SSD's do is reduce loading time right? Especially if we are talking Diablo 3. I have played the beta, game loads almost instantly.
Seeing as this is about a pc being built on a budget for D3 a SSD is pointless. Nothing /facepalm about that.
What is wrong with ppl, you do realise D3 zones load instantly....SSD's lol.
SSD is really not worth it, spare a few seconds on windows load and nothing on D3 loading...hahah.
Also, what PSU is in the case?
D3 will run maxed out on a lower gfx, like a 460 or a 5850 even. If you have budget constraints and wanna build a pc for d3 that is.
With your setup, and even much lower graphics card as that you will be able to run it maxed out smoothly. D3 does not take a lot of power from a pc. It does not even have ultra mode like sc2
You are completely wrong, it has not only been in development for 4-4.5 years.
Jay said at last year's blizcon in an interview "when i came on as project leader 6 years ago, blah blah blah" The game was already into development when he came on as project leader. Even if it started the moment he arrived (which it didnt) it is already 6.5 years. You are completely and utterly wrong. I do not get where you people actually get 4 - 4.5 years. The game was announced 4 years ago, gameplay videos / screenshots were already shown at that time.
Sigh at you.