I like the "lightning globe" orb she's holding. Wands and staffs are a little cliche these days, not to mention she's pretty young to be needing a walking stick!
I actually liked the staff myself (except that it generally sucked in DII). Walking sticks are cool.
I apologize for my mechanical nature to be precise in correcting you, but you should be more precise about what you say..
Or you shouldn't be so uptight. The point is: Blizzard employees are not retarded - they will give the fans what they want, or they will not be successful. They aren't making the game so as to play it themselves, they're making it to earn big bucks.
Boy, if ppl form blizzard are so close-minded as you, i will be very disapointed with the next 2 classes.
I really need something different, in gameplay aspects, from D1 and D2..
its his scapegoat... he basically cant say anything positive so he throws some random bull shit out there. there is nothing positive you can say above having so few players... 8 was low already but 4 hahaha damn...
Unless you back this up, you're just talking trash.
Yeah, but doesn't individual loot promote playing together even more now? Imagine if this was present in D2, we would have full games just for doing Andy and Mephisto. Now take out monsters that always drop more and better loot, and people are more intrigued to play together - even when they're going after gear, in all corners of the game.
What didn't work on D2 was when you made a public game, chances were you didn't get people to play the game with you, but instead, players joining to hunt you down. If I create a game to have people join me in beating act4, chances are I would probably enjoy actually getting to do that instead of having to deal with hostile players. Its not even that they necessarily kill me, its that I started up the game thinking "Hey, lets do that today" and not getting to do that.
How the gathering of items affect what Item Stores depends on how Blizzard works against them. Soulbound items won't exist like they did on WoW, which is good for our trading economy. Now Blizzard has to come up with a way to work around the money for items system.
Instead of half the fans complaining about how the game looks, they should all start brainstorming and maybe give Blizzard some feedback on how to solve that problem instead.
Somehow this made it to the back of my mind. Very insightful.
to be honost i could agree more that being someone who is now 17 and started playing this game when i think i was around 9 10 i was a die hard fan and personally feel betrayed by blizzard that they didnt do d2 justice when making a new diablo, like come on it looks like some final project by some computer programmer in college or something. they changed alot and many of the things i loved. i loved the fact that you couldnt go back and change your stats because then id try to make another one and make it better.. this seems like something ill play for a week. and it kills me to say that because i really did hope blizzard would make a new diablo, this just isnt it, cartoony is an understatement, more like a boot leg WoW... ill be so happy if they take our pleas in consideration seriously. because really they have a big enough loyal fan market that if they do this right it will be the biggest hit for a while.
i also dont like what has been said here. this is rarely the case (at least for me) and it sucks how a minority of pkers are ruining pvp for the rest of us. Diablos gone soft lol.
Yep, he seriously fucked up there.
What's wrong with being more "soft," anyways?
I agree entirely, i'm glad it's going to be more player-friendly. Getting PKed and even dueling seems like just a distraction from the actual game. If i'm trying to fight evil, i don't want some guy that's supposed to on my side coming out and trying to kill me while i'm already being killed by demons. There's no point.
What's the point of continuously hacking away at CPU's? You'd have to admit, the satisfaction of annihilating a fellow thinking entity is far greater than that of subjugating a faulty CPU.
Did you even read my post? Having an Internet connection is one thing. Having a good Internet connection is something totally different and costs quite a bit of money. Personally, I run off student Internet, which is sufficient for my web needs but terrible for gaming. I don't have the money to upgrade to my own faster ISP. I don't have the money to purchase a dozen routers/switches and construct a LAN. On top of all that, there are whole weeks where the Internet goes down. You just have to accept that the Internet is not a happy experience in every part of the world.
So, when my Internet goes down, I am not allowed to play LAN games with my friend? I am becoming weary of all the arrogance I am getting from people about how I should just "stop complaining and play on Battle.net". I think Battle.net is a great service for everyone, but for many (like myself) LAN play is just superior. So, unless you plan on sending me a $1000 check to upgrade my Internet for a few years, stop preaching about Battle.net's "solution" to the no-LAN problem.
If your internet connection sucks, you're going to have to accept disadvantages.
Come over to my place, and I'll show you. Ever heard of "lag"?
So your internet connection sucks. If they want to capitalize on internet connection, then tough. Internet isn't always happy, like you've said.
You either live at home with your parents or have a ridiculously awesome job. The rest of the word is not so fortunate. It astounds me that you can criticize people for their financial status. Get over yourself.
If someone has a computer, chances are that he or she has internet connection.
Even if an Internet connection is available, relying on some server hundreds of miles of way to play a game with a couple friends in the same room makes no sense whatsoever.
I actually liked the staff myself (except that it generally sucked in DII). Walking sticks are cool.
Or you shouldn't be so uptight. The point is: Blizzard employees are not retarded - they will give the fans what they want, or they will not be successful. They aren't making the game so as to play it themselves, they're making it to earn big bucks.
Such as? /10char
Unless you back this up, you're just talking trash.
Somehow this made it to the back of my mind. Very insightful.
You actually said nomenclature.
Anyways.
The wizard's pretty. Which is about a million times more important than the name.
What's wrong with being more "soft," anyways?
What's the point of continuously hacking away at CPU's? You'd have to admit, the satisfaction of annihilating a fellow thinking entity is far greater than that of subjugating a faulty CPU.
If your internet connection sucks, you're going to have to accept disadvantages.
So your internet connection sucks. If they want to capitalize on internet connection, then tough. Internet isn't always happy, like you've said.
If someone has a computer, chances are that he or she has internet connection.
Why not? There's virtually no difference.
So in other words, by not responding to any of the aforementioned statements, you concede each of your points?
P.S. No it's not. So there, ROFL!