Ragezone has put together a list of games in beta.
I figured I would put the link up here there are many and the site has link references setup well so I'm going to pass on doing the work they've already done and just post it
Beside that, Rusty Hearts is not in beta. It got released september 20th 2011...
Yes I've played it as well, it didn't exactly scream polished or out of beta back then, but it does appear to be.
It's probably okay for those fans of sidescrollers and the anime.
MMORPGs make you play with other people. In Diablo you can play alone. Not an MMO
Perhaps to you, MMO's philosophically encourage them-self be played with others as does D3 not to the degrees of other MMO's but it's not a determining factor. All MMO's allow the player to play by themself, doing so will likely impact your ability to excel much the same as in D3.
D3 is not an open world MMO most may be used too, but it does pretty much fall into the instanced lobby based party finding MMO's that are amply available on iiji games.
Your arguments are simply bad. You will do absolutely fine solo in Diablo 3, there is no multi-only content in the entire game. As more people join the game simply gets harder but you can do it all by yourself and that's how the game is intended.
Games have been simply "multiplayer" like this for 2 decades now. You can play solo and you can play multi. MMO is completely different.
MMORPGs make you play with other people. In Diablo you can play alone. Not an MMO
Perhaps to you, MMO's philosophically encourage them-self be played with others as does D3 not to the degrees of other MMO's but it's not a determining factor. All MMO's allow the player to play by themself, doing so will likely impact your ability to excel much the same as in D3.
D3 is not an open world MMO most may be used too, but it does pretty much fall into the instanced lobby based party finding MMO's that are amply available on iiji games.
You do realize that MMO stands for MASSIVELY Multiplayer Online? While D3 is online, at most you can play with four people so massively is not a word to describe D3. And the Diablo series, at this time, will be classified as an ARPG or Action Roleplaying Game.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I don't always burn. But when I do, I use hellfire.
It's an old arguement with both sides getting "a few" points right.
Those who say it's MMO are right because:
1. There's a massive amount of people on battle.net.
2. You "have" to play on battle.net
Those who say it's a simple Single-Player/Co-op ARPG are right because:
1. Even though you have to play online you can play alone.
2. You can only have 4 people in the same game at the same time.
The rest of the arguement is pretty much point of view. There's no right or wrong.
MMORPGs make you play with other people. In Diablo you can play alone. Not an MMO
Perhaps to you, MMO's philosophically encourage them-self be played with others as does D3 not to the degrees of other MMO's but it's not a determining factor. All MMO's allow the player to play by themself, doing so will likely impact your ability to excel much the same as in D3.
D3 is not an open world MMO most may be used too, but it does pretty much fall into the instanced lobby based party finding MMO's that are amply available on iiji games.
You do realize that MMO stands for MASSIVELY Multiplayer Online? While D3 is online, at most you can play with four people so massively is not a word to describe D3. And the Diablo series, at this time, will be classified as an ARPG or Action Roleplaying Game.
I realize all these things, I'm also quite aware the definition is inclusive and any meme used by an individual is defined by that individual not the reader and this is how a matter of law is discussed. Massive is subjective and so the creator of the article defines it.
For useless arguments sake, It does not matter the number in your party vs the pool of potential candidates.
As long as all these players interact by say an AH the spirit of the meaning of MMO is within the game.
The spirit of the meaning MMO is also in Super Mario Bros. because you know many players that play it and there can be "parties" of 2. It is incorrect however to assume a game is an MMO because players have a link to each other inside the game. That is the definition of a multiplayer game. And has been for the past 20 years.
Otherwise a scoreboard would also be assumed to be an MMO feature. Which has been present in arcade games for many decades.
The spirit of the meaning MMO is also in Super Mario Bros. because you know many players that play it and there can be "parties" of 2. It is incorrect however to assume a game is an MMO because players have a link to each other inside the game. That is the definition of a multiplayer game. And has been for the past 20 years.
Otherwise a scoreboard would also be assumed to be an MMO feature. Which has been present in arcade games for many decades.
Please cease your ad absurdium nonsense and false statements. I am not making these assumptions made by you.
You fail to comprehend what I am writing.
The spirit of a term is what is meant by the person using it not the person reading it, the term must be grounded and the writer must be the bound party.
You don't matter, it's their contract, their word is their bond.
Just like the idea of the definition you have it didn't come from you but you present it in a certain spirit when you say it, you attach yourself to it and you present the spirit of the term being such.
This is not a matter of arguments being bad, or your unqualified opinion of what is, this is contract law which is what journalism/communication is subject to as common law is always in effect and is the basis for all structured recourse, without this there is also no liability on the part of the poster.
Every word I have used has been correctly used and even then you fail to comprehend the populist definition of the term excel in it's correct context and proceed to make these replies.
It is well detailed this game has aspects that encourages multiple players in Blue-tracker allowing one to excel through cooperative play, this does not mean you will inversely struggle solo it means what I say it means.
I've demonstrated unnecessarily aspects that allow this to be an MMO under someones definition such as the AH directly effecting other players games, your opinion, follow closely >doesn't matter at all<.
I myself am a journalist and editor for quite some years now so who are you to say how qualified I am or am not? You talk as if people on the Internet are uneducated and in the majority of time have no idea what they speak of and have no right to demand being correct.
Being wrong cannot be justified in any way. If a scientific theory is wrong it is wrong, it doesn't magically get correct because it was published by someone on the Internet or because a few delusional people don't know the meaning of what they're talking about but prefer using it because it's easier for them to put in categories.
Diablo 3 is an ARPG, dungeon crawl, hack and slash but not MMO. Every poster in this topic including the company that is presenting the product and its entire community refer to it in one of the ways described above, yet we as a majority do not define the "populist definition"?
In music a term for genre can be used a lot more loosely where genres have been mixed for a few decades now and there is no true definition besides what the artist thinks he is creating and presenting. In video games however we are still very much inside the boundaries of genres and therefor everyone should be using the proper, true term for a product defined not only by its entire community but also the creator company. Otherwise he is misrepresenting the product.
If it's bad journalism it should be pointed out and not referred to as "using the spirit of a term". It's an incorrect term.
Also my opinion matters as much as your opinion. By that they are on the same level if one of us has more arguments to support his statement then he is by conclusion the correct person. I have no bad feelings towards the author of the article but you're continuing with your absurd claims even though every single person is correcting you.
A troll is someone that uses no arguments, the wrong arguments or is involved in the argument for the enjoyment of angering the opponent. I am in this debate because you and the author are using a term in an incorrect way and it should be pointed out. Having an AH that connects people does not, by any means, make a game an MMO. It brings interaction between players but the players do not depend on it and can completely ignore it. An MMO has features that make playing in parties necessary in order to achieve completion in the majority of aspects of the game. There are no such in Diablo 3.
And no, achievements do not make a game MMO either, even though there are achievements for parties. It's just a multiplayer game. What is so hard to grasp?
So I shall counter with the wise words you yourself mentioned: "Please cease your ad absurdium nonsense and false statements" and also correct you on "absurdum".
If the mods think this is too much then please feel free to delete/modify my comment.
I myself am a journalist and editor for quite some years now so who are you to say how qualified I am or am not? You talk as if people on the Internet are uneducated and in the majority of time have no idea what they speak of and have no right to demand being correct.
Being wrong cannot be justified in any way. If a scientific theory is wrong it is wrong, it doesn't magically get correct because it was published by someone on the Internet or because a few delusional people don't know the meaning of what they're talking about but prefer using it because it's easier for them to put in categories.
Diablo 3 is an ARPG, dungeon crawl, hack and slash but not MMO. Every poster in this topic including the company that is presenting the product and its entire community refer to it in one of the ways described above, yet we as a majority do not define the "populist definition"?
In music a term for genre can be used a lot more loosely where genres have been mixed for a few decades now and there is no true definition besides what the artist thinks he is creating and presenting. In video games however we are still very much inside the boundaries of genres and therefor everyone should be using the proper, true term for a product defined not only by its entire community but also the creator company. Otherwise he is misrepresenting the product.
If it's bad journalism it should be pointed out and not referred to as "using the spirit of a term". It's an incorrect term.
Also my opinion matters as much as your opinion. By that they are on the same level if one of us has more arguments to support his statement then he is by conclusion the correct person. I have no bad feelings towards the author of the article but you're continuing with your absurd claims even though every single person is correcting you.
A troll is someone that uses no arguments, the wrong arguments or is involved in the argument for the enjoyment of angering the opponent. I am in this debate because you and the author are using a term in an incorrect way and it should be pointed out. Having an AH that connects people does not, by any means, make a game an MMO. It brings interaction between players but the players do not depend on it and can completely ignore it. An MMO has features that make playing in parties necessary in order to achieve completion in the majority of aspects of the game. There are no such in Diablo 3.
And no, achievements do not make a game MMO either, even though there are achievements for parties. It's just a multiplayer game. What is so hard to grasp?
So I shall counter with the wise words you yourself mentioned: "Please cease your ad absurdium nonsense and false statements" and also correct you on "absurdum".
If the mods think this is too much then please feel free to delete/modify my comment.
Wrong in this situation is a matter of personal opinion as already detailed there is no science to what you're saying.
Science is knowledge proven experimentally, for something to be scientific it must be a working system of knowledge which in communication/dialogue, negotiation, is that of contract so when you decide something for more then yourself it requires at least tacit consent from the recipient, if the communication is recognized for what the writer intends the message has done it's job.
The writer doesn't need to be a regurgitating mouthpiece, they simply serve their clients.
I at no stage suggest that you need to agree. I do ask you to cease the absurdness of relating a scoreboard to an auction house, these things are not the same.
You are a troll and I have reported you as such, this message you don't need to agree with either but you are both derailing this thread and behaving in a petty manner.
Your opinion is unqualified as you do not speak for every person in an agreement based matter, though you assume you are the be all authority, unfortunately that would require my agreement and all others that you don't have but fascists like yourself are unfamiliar with this clearly. You are dealing in beliefs and subjectivity and want to impose what you believe, again a majority doesn't make one correct in agreement matters either, This is not a matter of justification because there is no wrong outside your mind.
Saying "you're wrong" is not an argument your statements are utterly nonsense, to suggest an object is another object when it's function is different and directly effects the game experience is not is not an argument, assuming you're right and that others not agreeing makes them wrong is just simple arrogant fascism no matter where it stems from, repeating yourself does not alter anything.
"correcting" assumes correctness.
I at no time suggest something is not a popular terminology. I say again my terms are worded as intended specifically within the context of their individual sentence. Hatchet jobs do not aid you they are of no consequence as you continually speak of redundant opinion.
You essentially have not said anything else other then that you think it's wrong beyond the absurd and insubstantial, it isn't incorrect for the writers purpose, it isn't for others, else others would not of already conversed about this,
This dialogue is not a new one, what you say is bunk due to non-agreement and people don't have to bow down to populism even populist authority needn't be agreed with.
You don't have to agree with any of these statements.
If you still want to take out of context someone else's definitions you can, if you want to feel like contextual hatchet jobs aid you, by all means.
Your words don't change what others have decided or game features, people that don't work for blizzard have no requirement to stick to what they advertise especially when creating an umbrella article or their own games.
There is no new argument here from you much less a correct one that you assume.The writer can choose to use a word and be inclusive of what they like, the conditioning from your education means absolutely nothing here it is you that are behaving as a policing agent, assuming of others and imposing a brand of correctness.
It would be assuming of me to say you were intending to do so or not, but you can just as well troll without intending to.
.
If you are not enjoying what you're doing you should perhaps not be doing it
I'm not making any absurd claims you are simply biased, to myself both definitions are true within their own environment, unless specified a definition is inclusive.
Take advantage of the beta links provided perhaps comment on them, enough of this nonsense, you've already shown a petty nature in your quotes your behavior is trolling, derailing, assuming and arrogantly fascist. Perhaps unwittingly in parts but all the same.
I would ask the thread be locked if this person cannot restrain them self.
I'm weary of this crap.
Nor am I concerned with the quality of any of the journalism, trolls are very rampant in journalism and this personality is not at all surprising. Ignorance or subtlety doesn't negate the behavior.
I figured I would put the link up here there are many and the site has link references setup well so I'm going to pass on doing the work they've already done and just post it
http://ragezone.com/2012/03/10/beta-watch-update-on-upcoming-games/
Ha. Bagstone.
Diablo III is Action RPG
It's probably okay for those fans of sidescrollers and the anime.
Perhaps to you, MMO's philosophically encourage them-self be played with others as does D3 not to the degrees of other MMO's but it's not a determining factor. All MMO's allow the player to play by themself, doing so will likely impact your ability to excel much the same as in D3.
D3 is not an open world MMO most may be used too, but it does pretty much fall into the instanced lobby based party finding MMO's that are amply available on iiji games.
Games have been simply "multiplayer" like this for 2 decades now. You can play solo and you can play multi. MMO is completely different.
Ha. Bagstone.
Those who say it's MMO are right because:
1. There's a massive amount of people on battle.net.
2. You "have" to play on battle.net
Those who say it's a simple Single-Player/Co-op ARPG are right because:
1. Even though you have to play online you can play alone.
2. You can only have 4 people in the same game at the same time.
The rest of the arguement is pretty much point of view. There's no right or wrong.
For useless arguments sake, It does not matter the number in your party vs the pool of potential candidates.
As long as all these players interact by say an AH the spirit of the meaning of MMO is within the game.
Otherwise a scoreboard would also be assumed to be an MMO feature. Which has been present in arcade games for many decades.
Ha. Bagstone.
Please cease your ad absurdium nonsense and false statements. I am not making these assumptions made by you.
You fail to comprehend what I am writing.
The spirit of a term is what is meant by the person using it not the person reading it, the term must be grounded and the writer must be the bound party.
You don't matter, it's their contract, their word is their bond.
Just like the idea of the definition you have it didn't come from you but you present it in a certain spirit when you say it, you attach yourself to it and you present the spirit of the term being such.
This is not a matter of arguments being bad, or your unqualified opinion of what is, this is contract law which is what journalism/communication is subject to as common law is always in effect and is the basis for all structured recourse, without this there is also no liability on the part of the poster.
Every word I have used has been correctly used and even then you fail to comprehend the populist definition of the term excel in it's correct context and proceed to make these replies.
It is well detailed this game has aspects that encourages multiple players in Blue-tracker allowing one to excel through cooperative play, this does not mean you will inversely struggle solo it means what I say it means.
I've demonstrated unnecessarily aspects that allow this to be an MMO under someones definition such as the AH directly effecting other players games, your opinion, follow closely >doesn't matter at all<.
If you continue you are a troll.
Being wrong cannot be justified in any way. If a scientific theory is wrong it is wrong, it doesn't magically get correct because it was published by someone on the Internet or because a few delusional people don't know the meaning of what they're talking about but prefer using it because it's easier for them to put in categories.
Diablo 3 is an ARPG, dungeon crawl, hack and slash but not MMO. Every poster in this topic including the company that is presenting the product and its entire community refer to it in one of the ways described above, yet we as a majority do not define the "populist definition"?
In music a term for genre can be used a lot more loosely where genres have been mixed for a few decades now and there is no true definition besides what the artist thinks he is creating and presenting. In video games however we are still very much inside the boundaries of genres and therefor everyone should be using the proper, true term for a product defined not only by its entire community but also the creator company. Otherwise he is misrepresenting the product.
If it's bad journalism it should be pointed out and not referred to as "using the spirit of a term". It's an incorrect term.
Also my opinion matters as much as your opinion. By that they are on the same level if one of us has more arguments to support his statement then he is by conclusion the correct person. I have no bad feelings towards the author of the article but you're continuing with your absurd claims even though every single person is correcting you.
A troll is someone that uses no arguments, the wrong arguments or is involved in the argument for the enjoyment of angering the opponent. I am in this debate because you and the author are using a term in an incorrect way and it should be pointed out. Having an AH that connects people does not, by any means, make a game an MMO. It brings interaction between players but the players do not depend on it and can completely ignore it. An MMO has features that make playing in parties necessary in order to achieve completion in the majority of aspects of the game. There are no such in Diablo 3.
And no, achievements do not make a game MMO either, even though there are achievements for parties. It's just a multiplayer game. What is so hard to grasp?
So I shall counter with the wise words you yourself mentioned: "Please cease your ad absurdium nonsense and false statements" and also correct you on "absurdum".
If the mods think this is too much then please feel free to delete/modify my comment.
Ha. Bagstone.
Science is knowledge proven experimentally, for something to be scientific it must be a working system of knowledge which in communication/dialogue, negotiation, is that of contract so when you decide something for more then yourself it requires at least tacit consent from the recipient, if the communication is recognized for what the writer intends the message has done it's job.
The writer doesn't need to be a regurgitating mouthpiece, they simply serve their clients.
I at no stage suggest that you need to agree. I do ask you to cease the absurdness of relating a scoreboard to an auction house, these things are not the same.
You are a troll and I have reported you as such, this message you don't need to agree with either but you are both derailing this thread and behaving in a petty manner.
Your opinion is unqualified as you do not speak for every person in an agreement based matter, though you assume you are the be all authority, unfortunately that would require my agreement and all others that you don't have but fascists like yourself are unfamiliar with this clearly. You are dealing in beliefs and subjectivity and want to impose what you believe, again a majority doesn't make one correct in agreement matters either, This is not a matter of justification because there is no wrong outside your mind.
Saying "you're wrong" is not an argument your statements are utterly nonsense, to suggest an object is another object when it's function is different and directly effects the game experience is not is not an argument, assuming you're right and that others not agreeing makes them wrong is just simple arrogant fascism no matter where it stems from, repeating yourself does not alter anything.
"correcting" assumes correctness.
I at no time suggest something is not a popular terminology. I say again my terms are worded as intended specifically within the context of their individual sentence. Hatchet jobs do not aid you they are of no consequence as you continually speak of redundant opinion.
You essentially have not said anything else other then that you think it's wrong beyond the absurd and insubstantial, it isn't incorrect for the writers purpose, it isn't for others, else others would not of already conversed about this,
This dialogue is not a new one, what you say is bunk due to non-agreement and people don't have to bow down to populism even populist authority needn't be agreed with.
You don't have to agree with any of these statements.
If you still want to take out of context someone else's definitions you can, if you want to feel like contextual hatchet jobs aid you, by all means.
Your words don't change what others have decided or game features, people that don't work for blizzard have no requirement to stick to what they advertise especially when creating an umbrella article or their own games.
There is no new argument here from you much less a correct one that you assume.The writer can choose to use a word and be inclusive of what they like, the conditioning from your education means absolutely nothing here it is you that are behaving as a policing agent, assuming of others and imposing a brand of correctness.
It would be assuming of me to say you were intending to do so or not, but you can just as well troll without intending to.
.
If you are not enjoying what you're doing you should perhaps not be doing it
I'm not making any absurd claims you are simply biased, to myself both definitions are true within their own environment, unless specified a definition is inclusive.
Take advantage of the beta links provided perhaps comment on them, enough of this nonsense, you've already shown a petty nature in your quotes your behavior is trolling, derailing, assuming and arrogantly fascist. Perhaps unwittingly in parts but all the same.
I would ask the thread be locked if this person cannot restrain them self.
I'm weary of this crap.
Nor am I concerned with the quality of any of the journalism, trolls are very rampant in journalism and this personality is not at all surprising. Ignorance or subtlety doesn't negate the behavior.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diablo_III
http://eu.blizzard.com/en-gb/games/
http://us.blizzard.com/diablo3/faq/#1_1
...and you call me a fascist?
Ok, I submit. If that's what it takes for you to stop throwing insults... I submit. You are right. Diablo is an MMO.
Ha. Bagstone.
A bit more on topic. I just got into the Ghost Recon Online Beta! Now I have another beta to get bored with in a matter of days.
And I don't think PVP-less Diablo 3 should be considered MMO