Yea.. Different guy... especially around the eyes. The second pic has a more masculine forehead and no unibrow
In Sofawalls pic I rekon he looks like Saywer from Lost (Josh Holloway)
In the second pic he also has a broader face.
Quote from "Carloseus" »
Trolling?....
No, personal opinion. You may say flame. But definitely not trolling.
Carlos, take an "Anatomy and Physiology" class, please. Jim Raynor has:
- a thinner face; faces don't get THAT wide in 5 years and not in that manner;
- an oval face; the face on the right is square, plastic surgery?
- Raynor's eyes are kinda skewed; the guy on the right has straight eyes. He really liked plastic surgery.
The transformation is anatomically impossible.
And we all know you don't care much for SC so YOU don't care. But I liked my Raynor, and I don't mind if he matured enough, but I do mind it when he seemed to have made a trip to Chernobyl and grown fatter arms and legs and got his face transformed...
Raynor actually always looked kinda irregular (French?) to me while this guy on the right looks like "American redneck # 89223"...
[Chernobyl = a nuclear power plant that blew up in Europe and caused mutations]
hmm... he looks ok. lets still see if hes as good at killin Zerg as he used to be
Aslong as he has the same voice, and his classic line "This is Jimmy" and frags Zergs with avengence, he will be awesome.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
Don't even hope for that. The same voice would certainly not meet that guy on the right (I can't call him Raynor cause that's not raynor).
Yeah, I remember seeing it a few months ago on IGN. I really can't even picture any sort of accident that could cause that change.
I will now ramble because no other threads interest me:
We will call the real Raynor - Raynor 1 and the imposter Raynor 2.
Raynor 1 looks to be in about his mid twenties. Raynor two looks in his mid to late fifties. Raynor 1 has a thin, round head. Raynor 2, however, has a rather square and a thick jaw. We can't complain about the body because we really didn't see a full body shot of him(Unless you did in story mode and I just forgot about it) The hair and the facial hair also throw me off. Good ol' Jimmy has a sexy unibrow and a shaved head with some stubble around his jaw and now we see Bad ol' Bastard with some freshly grown locks a nice fluffy beard and apparantly a waxing.
It's too late for Blizzard to change it now. They really have made a lot of changes as far as appearance goes.
Now I may just be picky but take a look. Granted, the picture is very shaded for SC1 but Zeratul has orange eyes and now has green. The skin color is much more grey and much less bluish purple than the new one and the head seems it is a LOT longer than it is in that picture.
The Dark Templar look alright but they also look nothing like eachother.
I'm curious to see what they will do to Tassadar and Artanis.
I'd say they look more WoWish, but not an WoW as WoW
So now we know for the record, Sawyer is Rayner and House is Gordon Freeman... I wander whats
next
Edit- Seeing as the threads gone cold. I have to say, both of the 2d raynors are different + the 3d raynor on the first post doesnt even look like the new "sawyer" version of raynor...
Are Blizzard slipping?
Take Half-Life 2 for example, they upgraded freeman graphically and he looks spot on
So, because this concept art isn't exactly what you want, y'all are deciding you already hate Jim Raynor of SC2?
Thats intellegent...
It's not concept art anymore. The whole Raynor model is done, there are several videos released showing Raynor walking around in his Battlecruiser and talking, so this is final alright.
PlugY for Diablo II allows you to reset skills and stats, transfer items between characters in singleplayer, obtain all ladder runewords and do all Uberquests while offline. It is the only way to do all of the above. Please use it.
Supporting big shoulderpads and flashy armor since 2004.
It's stupid to get into such details. Now, if it was Diablo it would be a huge issue. I think they made Raynor look more badass than the past one.
And as for the differences, in terms of facial appearance and structure, don't steroids make your jaw-line bigger and more square-like? And don't Marines have Stim-packs that they inject with to become better at their jobs? I'm not saying that you should take this and go "OMG he is so right!", but there is alot to Raynor we still don't know, and it has been ten years. Ten years of war, of being a leader of a struggling bunch of colonies, leading forces against his lost love, etc. He's had alot of difficulties, and seeing as that can sometimes change the appearance of a person I hold it no different in this case.
So, because this concept art isn't exactly what you want, y'all are deciding you already hate Jim Raynor of SC2?
Um, not that we hate this new guy, it's more like this new guy is not Jim Raynor.
Quote from "Carloseus;149777 »
It's stupid to get into such details. Now, if it was Diablo it would be a huge issue. I think they made Raynor look more badass than the past one.
You just don't care for SC, that's all, so you never cared for old Raynor, so of course you don't give a damn what he looks like.
Quote from Carloseus"" »
And as for the differences, in terms of facial appearance and structure, don't steroids make your jaw-line bigger and more square-like?
And don't they have medics who heal you at the speed of light? Don't give me that. Jim Raynor looked a certain way. He may have gotten darker a bit but he didn't mutate due to a Chernobyl outbreak. Unless they actually had one.
It's stupid to get into such details. Now, if it was Diablo it would be a huge issue. I think they made Raynor look more badass than the past one.
And as for the differences, in terms of facial appearance and structure, don't steroids make your jaw-line bigger and more square-like? And don't Marines have Stim-packs that they inject with to become better at their jobs? I'm not saying that you should take this and go "OMG he is so right!", but there is alot to Raynor we still don't know, and it has been ten years. Ten years of war, of being a leader of a struggling bunch of colonies, leading forces against his lost love, etc. He's had alot of difficulties, and seeing as that can sometimes change the appearance of a person I hold it no different in this case.
I give Jimmy Raynor #2 a "thumbs-up".
There you go.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
See?
Siaynoq's Playthroughs
- a thinner face; faces don't get THAT wide in 5 years and not in that manner;
- an oval face; the face on the right is square, plastic surgery?
- Raynor's eyes are kinda skewed; the guy on the right has straight eyes. He really liked plastic surgery.
The transformation is anatomically impossible.
And we all know you don't care much for SC so YOU don't care. But I liked my Raynor, and I don't mind if he matured enough, but I do mind it when he seemed to have made a trip to Chernobyl and grown fatter arms and legs and got his face transformed...
Raynor actually always looked kinda irregular (French?) to me while this guy on the right looks like "American redneck # 89223"...
[Chernobyl = a nuclear power plant that blew up in Europe and caused mutations]
Aslong as he has the same voice, and his classic line "This is Jimmy" and frags Zergs with avengence, he will be awesome.
Not too bad compared with the person on the right.
It's the decisions you make when you have no time to make them that define who you are.
Yeah, I remember seeing it a few months ago on IGN. I really can't even picture any sort of accident that could cause that change.
I will now ramble because no other threads interest me:
We will call the real Raynor - Raynor 1 and the imposter Raynor 2.
Raynor 1 looks to be in about his mid twenties. Raynor two looks in his mid to late fifties. Raynor 1 has a thin, round head. Raynor 2, however, has a rather square and a thick jaw. We can't complain about the body because we really didn't see a full body shot of him(Unless you did in story mode and I just forgot about it) The hair and the facial hair also throw me off. Good ol' Jimmy has a sexy unibrow and a shaved head with some stubble around his jaw and now we see Bad ol' Bastard with some freshly grown locks a nice fluffy beard and apparantly a waxing.
It's too late for Blizzard to change it now. They really have made a lot of changes as far as appearance goes.
Now I may just be picky but take a look. Granted, the picture is very shaded for SC1 but Zeratul has orange eyes and now has green. The skin color is much more grey and much less bluish purple than the new one and the head seems it is a LOT longer than it is in that picture.
The Dark Templar look alright but they also look nothing like eachother.
I'm curious to see what they will do to Tassadar and Artanis.
Hey, it could happen.
I don't know these graphics have a feel of WoW but a little better looking.
So now we know for the record, Sawyer is Rayner and House is Gordon Freeman... I wander whats
next
Edit- Seeing as the threads gone cold. I have to say, both of the 2d raynors are different + the 3d raynor on the first post doesnt even look like the new "sawyer" version of raynor...
Are Blizzard slipping?
Take Half-Life 2 for example, they upgraded freeman graphically and he looks spot on
Thats intellegent...
And as for the differences, in terms of facial appearance and structure, don't steroids make your jaw-line bigger and more square-like? And don't Marines have Stim-packs that they inject with to become better at their jobs? I'm not saying that you should take this and go "OMG he is so right!", but there is alot to Raynor we still don't know, and it has been ten years. Ten years of war, of being a leader of a struggling bunch of colonies, leading forces against his lost love, etc. He's had alot of difficulties, and seeing as that can sometimes change the appearance of a person I hold it no different in this case.
I give Jimmy Raynor #2 a "thumbs-up".
I think he looks cool, too. The thing that people are annoyed with is that he looks nothing like the old Jim, which just seems stupid.
5, not 10 years.
EDIT: at Carlos.
@Sofawall
There you go.