Of course it's old freaking tech since it was released in 2000. And thinking that Blizzard wouldn't improve the graphics is just being pathetic given they made Starcraft 2 in 3D.
So why did u even say this
Quote from name="Shere Khaan" »
Blizzard own all the intellectual property of the previous versions of Diablo. It would only take a mediocre gaming company to copy it and add new story to it. Blizzard will be able to take the solid foundation and take it a lot further.
Quote from name="Shere Khaan" »
This is a Diablo 3 forum, you come here and say Diablo 3 will be crappy with absolutely no basis; then somehow think that people will actually consider any point of view you have?.
pull up one post were i said diablo3 would be crappy! i might have said not the same or if it was made into a crappy mmo but i hate mmos not rpgs.
Quote from name="Shere Khaan" »
yes I am rude, and no I am not twisting your words. However, you are argumentative, sensationalist and don't write proper sentences.
But let me follow that up with some quotes of your gibberish just so I can defend why I have been rude.
no i don't want attention.
Yea u kids are lucky u have a program out now call (don't leave kids behind) I'm one of the many people that got left behind in school now they have program so that does not happen any more!
You have read the threads around here right? Ever heard of Starcraft? Ya, those people left? Ever heard of Starcraft 2? Hmm...
I wasn't aware the people of the original starcraft left. Fill me in more pls?
And since theyre coming out with Starcraft 2, announced and all, it will get the job done. Even though it looks like all they have are new units and graphics (no game mechanic changes, or warcraft 3 equivolant of hero classes), it still looks worthy of the purchase. Plus I like that storyline alot, almost as much as diablo, i personally think the warcraft storyline is balls all over mouths.
The point is; We're seeing a starcraft 2 because they were able to create a kickass Starcraft 2, regardless of whether or not the original starcraft minds are included in the new games creation. We're NOT seeing a Diablo 3 because they have NOT been able to create a kickass D3. If Blizzard North was still around, there would most likely be a D3 out and either an expansion or a D4 in the making, because their way of creating the diablo series worked really well.
The goal i've been trying to reach all along has been met, so I will not toil much unless something goes terribly awry.
Cain=Belial IMO. Why wouldn't demons kill a man in a cage 4 feet off the ground?
It's pretty simple really. In response to your claims that Diablo 3 was going to be crap because some previous people that worked on Diablo 2 had left, I explained that even a mediocre company could take Diablo 2 and make a third one. But Blizzard being a quality games company with money to burn ad a reputation to attract good staff would be able to take it much further and make an awesome game.
You then said something about D2 being old tech, so I simply replied it was somewhat pathetic to think that Blizzard would actually do Diablo 3 as a 2D game.
pull up one post were i said diablo3 would be crappy! i might have said not the same or if it was made into a crappy mmo but i hate mmos not rpgs.
Riiiight. So when you said:
Even if a diablo3 ever comes out it going be nothing more the a crappy copy cat mmo wow type game.
You actually meant this in a good sense.
And now let me look at this. You don't like MMO's, so why are you even blowing HGL's horn? You know that it is going to have raid content, pvp etc? You're going to have to pay $12 US a month to access this raid content which puts it on par with WoW cost-wise - and probably like wow with raids too.
Good luck being satisfied with the online features without paying a premium price for it.
The original post sounds like viral marketing to me (I didn't bother reading the rest of the thread). Anyway, I'm sure Hellgate: London will be a decent game, but it's not going to be a substitute for a new Diablo, at least for me. I want Diablo, not some watered down, sci-fi hybrid of it! I'm sure most Diablo fans would echo my views. I could care less if it was made by the original creators of Diablo. Unlike books, painting, and other forms of media, the actual people and personalites in game design don't mean all that much. The current staff at Blizzard could probably beat the original creators of Diablo at making a new Diablo game. They certainly have the resources and skill to do so, and I think they will.
nope but i have read and seen enough info on the game tell me it will be a blast. IF it NO fun truste me i be first that come back eat my words suck up say u guys are right but thats me.
Quote from "slayerwarrior" »
So why did u even say this
[quote name='Shere Khaan']It's pretty simple really. In response to your claims that Diablo 3 was going to be crap because some previous people that worked on Diablo 2 had left, I explained that even a mediocre company could take Diablo 2 and make a third one. But Blizzard being a quality games company with money to burn ad a reputation to attract good staff would be able to take it much further and make an awesome game..
so u like blizzard , they have 1 title that i like diablo but thats it. eq2 imo is way better then wow in the mmo and has alot more content imo. When u hit raid zone in eq2 u have multi bosses to take down not just 1.
Quote from name="Shere Khaan" »
You then said something about D2 being old tech, so I simply replied it was somewhat pathetic to think that Blizzard would actually do Diablo 3 as a 2D game.
Never thought blizzard would do d3 in 2d. let me add when i said old tech i mean d3 will need start from scratch. so what good would d2 be for them?but what do i know i'm not a tech it's just my point of view.
Quote from name="Shere Khaan" »
Riiiight. So when you said:.
That going on the info i had about diablo3 being mmo heaven vs hell. soon as i read that crap about it might be a mmo like wow your'e right in my mind it will suck and lost all it's appeal for me.
Quote from name="Shere Khaan" »
You actually meant this in a good sense.
And now let me look at this. You don't like MMO's, so why are you even blowing HGL's horn? You know that it is going to have raid content, pvp etc? You're going to have to pay $12 US a month to access this raid content which puts it on par with WoW cost-wise - and probably like wow with raids too.
Good luck being satisfied with the online features without paying a premium price for it.
First i'll be paying not even for the extra content but just for update/patchs that will stop cheats/hacks ect... to me 10.00 (not 12 unless u got something new)buck is worth ever penny long as i'm having fun. the extra content will just be a bonus. i like to solo/group really care less for raid but some do.
i hate mmo for one reason force raiding to even have a chance for best items and in eq2 ( raid is 24 people )it really limits the amount of fun. wow not sure but 4-6 hours for one end mob need as many as 40 people blah for elite item blah.
U know raids are not going be same like wow or eq2. from my understand u will not need group of 24/40 people kill a name for chance to get elite item all players will have chance at elite items solo/group/raid. This part what i like the most (loot elite loot being able to have a chance at finding best items in the game soloing/group/raid or how ever u like). swords/guns who care long as it's a fun cool rpg and hgl fits in to what i'm looking for like diablo did u can solo/group for random elite drops u be able to build chars useing stats/skill points items ect... and kill ton and tons mobs with hours of fun and not be limited. they have add alot stuff to missions/events//color code /quest ect... thing they want to do for diablo but never had a chance.
The original post sounds like viral marketing to me (I didn't bother reading the rest of the thread). Anyway, I'm sure Hellgate: London will be a decent game, but it's not going to be a substitute for a new Diablo, at least for me. I want Diablo, not some watered down, sci-fi hybrid of it! I'm sure most Diablo fans would echo my views. I could care less if it was made by the original creators of Diablo. Unlike books, painting, and other forms of media, the actual people and personalites in game design don't mean all that much. The current staff at Blizzard could probably beat the original creators of Diablo at making a new Diablo game. They certainly have the resources and skill to do so, and I think they will.
water down? no more like a new type rpg just like diablo when it first came out. i'll bet it will be better then decent, and blizzard could make a better diablo where is it?
Del this thread. It is not going anywhere, everything was already said 300 times and if slayerwarrior can't read it is his issue, don't waste your time replying...
Del this thread. It is not going anywhere, everything was already said 300 times and if slayerwarrior can't read it is his issue, don't waste your time replying...
started with good intentions but turned into a flame fest.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
So why did u even say this
pull up one post were i said diablo3 would be crappy! i might have said not the same or if it was made into a crappy mmo but i hate mmos not rpgs.
no i don't want attention.
Yea u kids are lucky u have a program out now call (don't leave kids behind) I'm one of the many people that got left behind in school now they have program so that does not happen any more!
I wasn't aware the people of the original starcraft left. Fill me in more pls?
And since theyre coming out with Starcraft 2, announced and all, it will get the job done. Even though it looks like all they have are new units and graphics (no game mechanic changes, or warcraft 3 equivolant of hero classes), it still looks worthy of the purchase. Plus I like that storyline alot, almost as much as diablo, i personally think the warcraft storyline is balls all over mouths.
The point is; We're seeing a starcraft 2 because they were able to create a kickass Starcraft 2, regardless of whether or not the original starcraft minds are included in the new games creation. We're NOT seeing a Diablo 3 because they have NOT been able to create a kickass D3. If Blizzard North was still around, there would most likely be a D3 out and either an expansion or a D4 in the making, because their way of creating the diablo series worked really well.
The goal i've been trying to reach all along has been met, so I will not toil much unless something goes terribly awry.
Cain=Belial IMO. Why wouldn't demons kill a man in a cage 4 feet off the ground?
It's pretty simple really. In response to your claims that Diablo 3 was going to be crap because some previous people that worked on Diablo 2 had left, I explained that even a mediocre company could take Diablo 2 and make a third one. But Blizzard being a quality games company with money to burn ad a reputation to attract good staff would be able to take it much further and make an awesome game.
You then said something about D2 being old tech, so I simply replied it was somewhat pathetic to think that Blizzard would actually do Diablo 3 as a 2D game.
Riiiight. So when you said:
You actually meant this in a good sense.
And now let me look at this. You don't like MMO's, so why are you even blowing HGL's horn? You know that it is going to have raid content, pvp etc? You're going to have to pay $12 US a month to access this raid content which puts it on par with WoW cost-wise - and probably like wow with raids too.
Good luck being satisfied with the online features without paying a premium price for it.
Have you played HG:L?
nope but i have read and seen enough info on the game tell me it will be a blast. IF it NO fun truste me i be first that come back eat my words suck up say u guys are right but thats me.
so u like blizzard , they have 1 title that i like diablo but thats it. eq2 imo is way better then wow in the mmo and has alot more content imo. When u hit raid zone in eq2 u have multi bosses to take down not just 1.
Never thought blizzard would do d3 in 2d. let me add when i said old tech i mean d3 will need start from scratch. so what good would d2 be for them?but what do i know i'm not a tech it's just my point of view.
That going on the info i had about diablo3 being mmo heaven vs hell. soon as i read that crap about it might be a mmo like wow your'e right in my mind it will suck and lost all it's appeal for me.
First i'll be paying not even for the extra content but just for update/patchs that will stop cheats/hacks ect... to me 10.00 (not 12 unless u got something new)buck is worth ever penny long as i'm having fun. the extra content will just be a bonus. i like to solo/group really care less for raid but some do.
i hate mmo for one reason force raiding to even have a chance for best items and in eq2 ( raid is 24 people )it really limits the amount of fun. wow not sure but 4-6 hours for one end mob need as many as 40 people blah for elite item blah.
U know raids are not going be same like wow or eq2. from my understand u will not need group of 24/40 people kill a name for chance to get elite item all players will have chance at elite items solo/group/raid. This part what i like the most (loot elite loot being able to have a chance at finding best items in the game soloing/group/raid or how ever u like). swords/guns who care long as it's a fun cool rpg and hgl fits in to what i'm looking for like diablo did u can solo/group for random elite drops u be able to build chars useing stats/skill points items ect... and kill ton and tons mobs with hours of fun and not be limited. they have add alot stuff to missions/events//color code /quest ect... thing they want to do for diablo but never had a chance.
pvp can be alot fun if done right.
water down? no more like a new type rpg just like diablo when it first came out. i'll bet it will be better then decent, and blizzard could make a better diablo where is it?
release date diablO and makers 11/30/96
http://www.gamefaqs.com/computer/doswin/data/11255.html
release date diablo2 and makers Jun 29, 2000
http://www.gamefaqs.com/computer/doswin/data/197113.html
4 yrs between diablo/diablo2 it been 7 yr's now and no d3 good luck!
I'm not the only one with issuse
Siaynoq's Playthroughs
im readig that list of names and im thinking to myself good times
Rick (lord de) Seis
Jonathan "Jordan" Stone
Erich and Max Schaefer('s legendary mallet)
Phil Shenk (the overseer)
Geoff Fraizer (GFraizer, or Reziarfg)
BILL ROPER WAS THE VOICE OF DIABLO
lol. thats pretty good.
started with good intentions but turned into a flame fest.