well, his tail/penis thing is really oddly lighted up. Either its really light, or its just the palest part of him. It shouldn't be that bright though, so I guess its just pale?
ohh, I haven't played silent hill. I love the movie though. I think I should play it.
I wish I could change my vote, now I wanna vote for 2.
In all honesty, I think you just want this to be a penis. Do you have some manner of strange demon fetish :confused:
Jk, lol, this is a really oddly interesting thread.
Quote from "Dark_Confidant" »
i vote yes, but there are some contitions, genitalia per se, should stay marginaly hidden, hint to it, dont show it plz.
the boobs, ass and other sexual traits that make some in game characters to strangely appealing ( not monsters only, but look how sexy the amazon and the assassin seem ) should be +- revealed.
i guess has long has it is n't gay, and stays on the erotic limit, i dont mind.
Nothing pornografic plz, after all ,kids play this game
Thought i dont look at it from the purist demon lore point of view, more from an artistic taste.
Technically Andariel should be considered porn, all she has are rings on her nipples, and her butt is completely visible, as well as all the space in between, but I heard that since she is techincally a "demon", that it is considered an animal, and, hence, not porn. Or atleast that's why I've heard that this game didn't get Adult Only.
Quote from name="Elfen Lied" »
That some people are scared more by something that seems more real than something fake?
Adding a penis doesn't make something more real to me. It just shows how morally disturbing some people can be, although I guess since I'm already playing this game, it would be hypocritical to say that, lol.
I guess if I were a girl, I'd be more scared of it. But unless that demon likes....raping...guys with that rock thing coming out of his tailbone/groin, then I would have no reason to be afraid.
And personally, if I saw some kind of barbarian coming at me naked, I'd be less scared of him than the fully armored knight, who obviously would be more invulnerable than the naked barbarian.
Forget this post, I read someone's later post and found out that this one is unneeded. Sorry, I should have read a little more before I posted, lol.
Im sure you know how fucking crazy the world and its inhabitants are, for all we know dinos had penises on their foreheads. I mean look at the velociraptor it evolved into the modern day chicken, and your telling me that its a reach to say that dinosaurs used to have external hardware?
just take a look at modern day reptiles and you will have your answer.
What like that crocodile in Jackass that had his wang showing?
And i just don't want D3 to be Adult Only so please blizzard if you decide to put in genitals, make sure that D3 is mature not AO
I doubt it would every get that far.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
Im sure you know how fucking crazy the world and its inhabitants are, for all we know dinos had penises on their foreheads.
For some reason, that reminded me of an episode of Squidbillies, where Early wore a giant penis-shaped hat to church.
Quote from "Murderface" »
I would like to see diablo in an AO world though.
Same here, though I highly doubt it'll happen. I'm not saying that just for the nudity, either (though some people might see that as a plus). Just imagine a game world where there are realistic amounts of blood and savagery, where you never know what's going to pop around the next corner, or what immoral, inhumane things will happen. It seems to me that it'd create a greater sense of urgency and actually encourage people to work together (might be a stretch, but hey).
Besides, maybe an AO Diablo title would keep the "WUW/WUG" spam out of the game.
do you want to see 2 demons doing it as you walk in hell. that would make me go oh shit wtf. then watch for 2 seconds wondering what the fuck they doing then say FK it and go kill them. the only games that should be rated AO would be games that are mainly sex and porn. no diablo porn. unless it is like sex scene from like god of war or mass effect where it is optional for people to get to that kind of shit. plus idk when you started playing diablo but i was like 8-10 how many kids you think play diablo. they wont be able to play it if it is rated AO. and that just sucks.
oh and sorry i took a glimpse at the awards and didnt remember all of them.
It would be weird to see demons making hate (instead of love) but then again if demons do have sex then I imagine its not outside the realm of possibility to say that you might stumble across them in the act while trapsing about the plains of hell.
ya its a possibility but i still think it would be a bad idea to do that unless it would be something like god of war or mass effect. i think thats the only way i would except it in there. and blizzard probably wouldn't put sex in there either.
Wonder why people aren't modding the hell out of LOD? Sorry, little off topic.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
-Humankind cannot gain anything without first giving something in return. To obtain, something of equal value must be lost. That is alchemy's First Law of Equivalent Exchange. In those days, we really believed that to be the world's one, and only, truth.
do you want to see 2 demons doing it as you walk in hell. that would make me go oh shit wtf. then watch for 2 seconds wondering what the fuck they doing then say FK it and go kill them. the only games that should be rated AO would be games that are mainly sex and porn. no diablo porn. unless it is like sex scene from like god of war or mass effect where it is optional for people to get to that kind of shit.
An Adults Only rating doesn't only apply to sex in a video game. It also includes large and extended amounts of violence. That's mostly what I was referring to, though you can take it any way you want.
Quote from "necronergal" »
plus idk when you started playing diablo but i was like 8-10 how many kids you think play diablo. they wont be able to play it if it is rated AO. and that just sucks.
Diablo isn't marketed toward children. It was never meant to be marketed toward children. That's why it's rated M. Of course, if someone really wants to play the game, a rating won't stand in their way, but still.
I'm not trying to be argumentative, but that's just how I see it.
i understand that AO can also mean alot of violence like the controversy with manhut 2. and yes nothing will stand in anyones way when there is a good game with a rating they cant play. but still it is way harder to get a game rated AO than M.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
In all honesty, I think you just want this to be a penis. Do you have some manner of strange demon fetish :confused:
Jk, lol, this is a really oddly interesting thread.
Technically Andariel should be considered porn, all she has are rings on her nipples, and her butt is completely visible, as well as all the space in between, but I heard that since she is techincally a "demon", that it is considered an animal, and, hence, not porn. Or atleast that's why I've heard that this game didn't get Adult Only.
Adding a penis doesn't make something more real to me. It just shows how morally disturbing some people can be, although I guess since I'm already playing this game, it would be hypocritical to say that, lol.
I guess if I were a girl, I'd be more scared of it. But unless that demon likes....raping...guys with that rock thing coming out of his tailbone/groin, then I would have no reason to be afraid.
And personally, if I saw some kind of barbarian coming at me naked, I'd be less scared of him than the fully armored knight, who obviously would be more invulnerable than the naked barbarian.
Forget this post, I read someone's later post and found out that this one is unneeded. Sorry, I should have read a little more before I posted, lol.
And i just don't want D3 to be Adult Only so please blizzard if you decide to put in genitals, make sure that D3 is mature not AO
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
What like that crocodile in Jackass that had his wang showing?
I doubt it would every get that far.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
It's the decisions you make when you have no time to make them that define who you are.
you sick perv.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
For some reason, that reminded me of an episode of Squidbillies, where Early wore a giant penis-shaped hat to church.
Same here, though I highly doubt it'll happen. I'm not saying that just for the nudity, either (though some people might see that as a plus). Just imagine a game world where there are realistic amounts of blood and savagery, where you never know what's going to pop around the next corner, or what immoral, inhumane things will happen. It seems to me that it'd create a greater sense of urgency and actually encourage people to work together (might be a stretch, but hey).
Besides, maybe an AO Diablo title would keep the "WUW/WUG" spam out of the game.
oh and sorry i took a glimpse at the awards and didnt remember all of them.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
Fuck you, I'm a dragon.
http://nwvault.ign.com/View.php?view=Modules.Detail&id=4869
Course that is just a mod.
Wonder why people aren't modding the hell out of LOD? Sorry, little off topic.
An Adults Only rating doesn't only apply to sex in a video game. It also includes large and extended amounts of violence. That's mostly what I was referring to, though you can take it any way you want.
Diablo isn't marketed toward children. It was never meant to be marketed toward children. That's why it's rated M. Of course, if someone really wants to play the game, a rating won't stand in their way, but still.
I'm not trying to be argumentative, but that's just how I see it.