Of course I haven't played (or even have it installed), because I couldn't check if the torches were all litted... oh wait. I JUST DID...
My point is still the same, litted torches = night. And, oh, I'm not going to assume that you never played, I'm simply going to assume that you forgot that the torches HAVE light radius outside all the time.
Is your concept of reality absolutely broken?
Have you ever had a flashlight in your hand when it was day outside? Have you ever been near a fire when in the day light?
Can you not even piece together that Act 1 is cloudy, hence the rain?
"I find the new graphics insulting to the serious and foreboding setting of the plot and genre.
Its like dressing a marine up in a ballerina outfit and sending him into war.
PATHETIC!"
First things first, Art and game design should never turn into some sort of pseudo democracy, this is not presidential elections, the only one who has the right to decide what Diablo 3 looks like is Blizzard, not mindless nostalgia fueled petitions or crazed hard-core fans.
That's the main reason companies other than Blizzard ignore all this nonsense and make their games in secret to avoid such nonsense, and soon Blizzard too will do the same because of the attitude of mindless immature fans.
I have said countless time that Blizzard justified their changes in the game looks during their Art Panels in WWI, and it makes more sense than the mindless nostalgia fest going on here, anyone with even the slightest artistic sense could see how much hard work has been done on Diablo 3, so it is immature, implotie and rude to just ask them to change it all just because your nostlagia is hurting, if you don't like Diablo 3 as it is just don't buy it or play it, go play the countless gritty clones out there, or make your own company.
Reasons for the changes:-
*it has been already 20 years since Diablo 2, more than enough to change the whole look of the world.
* Stylish, giving Diablo 3 its own character and personality, allowing it to stand out from the crowd of brown and grey games, or 'realistic' (e.g. boring) looking games.
* Not monotonous. The use of inviting colours, contours, tones, vibrance, and animations are some of the game's major strengths. Makes the game accessible and playable for a long period of time.
* The use of colors allow for a wide variety of settings and locations, away from the mundane worlds of greys and browns.
* Vibrant colors and a wide variety of locations do not prohibit the game from having 'dark gothic' locations within the game. Diablo 2 consisted mainly of vibrant locations, but that didn't prevent the Durance of Hate from being a part of the game.
So to set things right i'll try to explain those changes and refute all the baseless nostalgia fueled claims that make no sense.
1-claim one They say Diablo 3 is cartoony and colorful Validtiy:nonsense, if Diablo 3 is cartoony then real life is loony toons, Diablo 1 and Diablo 2 were more much more colorful and cartoony than Diablo 3, which is 40 times more realistic than both of them.
Proofs:
-NATURE is VIVID and COLORFUL and that DOESN'T MAKE IT CARTOONY
IF THIS IS CARTOONY
THEN THIS IS A PIC FROM LOONY TOONS
-RAINBOWS are a freaking NATURAL phenomena, it has nothing to do with your freaking PONIES
Let's play find the ponie, what ?, there ain't any, OMG !!!!!
-Diablo 2 and Diablo 1 were very colorful and very cartoony ( STATED BY DIABLO DEV TEAM )
DIABLO 2 DISCO TIME
Still wonder which one is cartoony colorful and bright and which one is realistic, then maybe you should you go check your eyes at the nearest doctor.
Also D2 had normal daytime and VERY BRIGHT environments
IT WAS NOT ALL GLOOOMY AND DARK, you don't know what you are talking about and make yourselves look like 15 years old emo-Gothic girls how want every thing black and blotted with blood and gore, GET A LIFE.
2-claim two They say Diablo 3 looks like WoW Validtiy:Not true, Diablo 3 has a slightly stylish look that looks nothing like WoW, Team Fortress has a stylish look, does that mean it looks like WoW or Diablo 3, NO, and also in general not every fantasy stylized 3d game is WoW.
Proofs: This is the very stylish and low poly look of WoW, you can see it's textures and details are greatly lacking and that the colors are not coherent, both hands and feet are large and anatomy in general is exaggerated
THIS is DIABLO 3, the COLORS are COHERENT, the DETAILS are CRISP, the TEXTURES are RICH, the MOOD is CLEARLY SET, the CHARACTER SKIN is very detailed and the anatomy is only slightly stylized and looks closer to real life than anything before ( even in D1 and D2 )
NOT EVERY 3D stylized game is WOW, get real.
AND STYLISH = NOT BORING
( they stated that countless times but you call yourselves Blizz fans and keep ignoring that )
No Blizz true fan would Want D3 to look like every freaking generic 3d hack and slash clone out there, they are all NOT stylized and look like each other.
Can you even tell the difference between the first screen shot and the other two, for your surprise they are both two different games, yet they freaking look the same, do you know why ?
BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH FREAKING DARK AND BORING WITH NO MOOD OR AMBIENT COLORS, NO SANE DIABLO FAN WOULD WANT DIABLO 3 to look this GENERIC, BLAND AND SHITTY.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------////
3-claim three They say Diablo 3 Armor is spiky and large Validtiy:That's hilarious, did you even check how the armor wore by the Barbarian in D2 looked like, seriously !!!!!
Proofs:
The spiky armor above was in the game, and this Barbarian 3D model here was the one used for the 2D sprite in the Diablo 2 game as stated by the artist himself, so, that bland looking armor or this new more detailed and realistic one.
The Barbarian heavy armor designs always featured spikes and huge shoulder pieces, and simple as that, it looks a lot better now.
Warhammer universe also has very bulky armor and there is nothing cartoony about it, it is a gritty universe.
That's all for now
And remember i'm not the one how created the current look for Daiblo 3, it is BLIZZARD, the same company that made DIABLO 1 and DIABLO 2 that you keep whining about, THEY KNOW BETTER THAN YOU.
THEY HAD VERY GOOD REASONS FOR THEIR CHANGES, and ALL you WHINE about IS NOSTALGIA, DARKNESS AND BLOOD, quite an argument, an perfectly EMO one.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"This place is thick with the stench of ghouls"
Said the Barbarian before proceeding to slaughter everyone
And remember i'm not the one how created the current look for Daiblo 3, it is BLIZZARD, the same company that made DIABLO 1 and DIABLO 2 that you keep whining about, THEY KNOW BETTER THAN YOU.
Time for a history lesson.
1. Diablo was not made by Blizzard. Blizzard bought the company a month or two before the game was released.
2. Blizzard North, the company that changed its name after they were bought, left Blizzard a few years ago to go on to do two different things.
A. Some joined NCsoft.
B. The others made Hellgate: London.
3. Not a single dev that made Diablo 1 and 2 are working on Diablo 3. The only person that is still working for Blizzard is the lore guy. That's it.
Blizzard, currently, knows just about as well as I do about what makes a Diablo game a Diablo game. They've shared the exact same experiences that we have: They have played it.
To be more correct, Chris Metzen (the Blizz lore guy) was always part of Blizzard, not of Blizzard North. The same as Metzen's buddy, Samwise Didier (the Blizz art guy), who was the ART DIRECTOR of Diablo I.
So, basically, the two guys that created the story and art of Diablo were always part of Blizzard. Blizzard North created the engine.
Forgot about two other guys, Eric Sexton and Michio Okamura. They founded Hyboreal Games, now L5 games.
To be more correct, Diablo (1) was developed by Condor. Condor was bought out by Blizzard 6 months before the rease, and was named Blizzard North. That's not much time for much change. Especially lore changes, and art changes. I doubt Chris Metzen, or Samwise had that much to do with the game.
First things first, Art and game design should never turn into some sort of pseudo democracy, this is not presidential elections, the only one who has the right to decide...
You sir get a GOLD star for the day. Two Thumps Up!! :thumbsup:
*it has been already 20 years since Diablo 2, more than enough to change the whole look of the world.
< Wall of Images >
I say: It has ONLY been 20 years since Diablo 2. Is that enough to change the whole look of the world? Did the extreme makeover crew rebuild the tristram cathedral? How much has our physical world changed since 1988... and we haven't been ravaged by demons. (or have we?)
It doens't look MUCH darker to me. A bit darker. It's still clean, it's still green, no dirt green like in Act I.
And I guess you've never been to grass plains because they are pretty light green. In fact, they often have random flowers and thorn stuff. In Ukraine, at least.
3. Not a single dev that made Diablo 1 and 2 are working on Diablo 3. The only person that is still working for Blizzard is the lore guy. That's it.
Learn your facts many many people rejoined blizzard... Also Blizzard north started Diablo 3 so you are made of fail.
Blizzard made the right choice... Diablo 2 was even more colorful when it first came out and they slowly patched it... what makes you think they won't do the same
1. Diablo was not made by Blizzard. Blizzard bought the company a month or two before the game was released.
2. Blizzard North, the company that changed its name after they were bought, left Blizzard a few years ago to go on to do two different things.
A. Some joined NCsoft.
B. The others made Hellgate: London.
3. Not a single dev that made Diablo 1 and 2 are working on Diablo 3. The only person that is still working for Blizzard is the lore guy. That's it.
Blizzard, currently, knows just about as well as I do about what makes a Diablo game a Diablo game. They've shared the exact same experiences that we have: They have played it.
What matters is that no fans were involved at all at making Diablo 1 and Diablo 2, they were solely made by their Dev teams ( whoever they are ) and without anybody whining about it.
Not all people from Blizz north left Blizzard, some of them moved to Irvine.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
You would be a fool if you think that you know better than the current Dev art team, its their work and they analyzed diablo 1 and 2 more than you will ever do, watch the art panels, they weren't playing hockey during those 4 years.
Just get a life or a hobby and find something better to do than whining about a game that was announced just few days ago, accept the change and evolution of the game, it is a 3D game now, it is next-gen, it is stylized, it is different, a change the was clearly JUSTIFIED by the Devs.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"This place is thick with the stench of ghouls"
Said the Barbarian before proceeding to slaughter everyone
I say: It has ONLY been 20 years since Diablo 2. Is that enough to change the whole look of the world? Did the extreme makeover crew rebuild the tristram cathedral? How much has our physical world changed since 1988... and we haven't been ravaged by demons. (or have we?)
We're an industrialized world that doesn't allow change past our own bulldozer-like expansionism and exploitation of resources.
If we disappeared, most of the world would be dense wildlands again within 20 years.
Well today i checked G4tv.com as i usually do and saw an article on the front page about the response from Keith Lee the lead producer of Diablo 3 about the new art style and how he feels about the art direction in Diablo 3.
Here is the link to the story.
| http://multiplayerblog.mtv.com/2008/07/02/diablo-iii-art-direction/ |
Comment, thoughts, responses appreciated.
This will probably be featured on todays AOTS as well, at time of writing the petition has 20,000 signatures.
I say: It has ONLY been 20 years since Diablo 2. Is that enough to change the whole look of the world? Did the extreme makeover crew rebuild the tristram cathedral? How much has our physical world changed since 1988... and we haven't been ravaged by demons. (or have we?)
I say: After moving away for 3 years, upon my return to my old neighborhood, the place is completely full of new shopping centers and houses. Two new schools were built, a new football stadium was built, a new church was built... the list goes on and on. Granted, Tristam doesn't have the awesome technology that we have today but I'm sure they manage.
I say: It has ONLY been 20 years since Diablo 2. Is that enough to change the whole look of the world? Did the extreme makeover crew rebuild the tristram cathedral? How much has our physical world changed since 1988... and we haven't been ravaged by demons. (or have we?)
Check Germany after WW2 directly and check Germany after 20 years from WW2, can you realize the difference that can happen in 20 years, seriously !!!?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"This place is thick with the stench of ghouls"
Said the Barbarian before proceeding to slaughter everyone
First things first, Art and game design should never turn into some sort of pseudo democracy, this is not presidential elections, the only one who has the right to decide what Diablo 3 looks like is Blizzard, not mindless nostalgia fueled petitions or crazed hard-core fans.
That's the main reason companies other than Blizzard ignore all this nonsense and make their games in secret to avoid such nonsense, and soon Blizzard too will do the same because of the attitude of mindless immature fans.
I have said countless time that Blizzard justified their changes in the game looks during their Art Panels in WWI, and it makes more sense than the mindless nostalgia fest going on here, anyone with even the slightest artistic sense could see how much hard work has been done on Diablo 3, so it is immature, implotie and rude to just ask them to change it all just because your nostlagia is hurting, if you don't like Diablo 3 as it is just don't buy it or play it, go play the countless gritty clones out there, or make your own company.
Reasons for the changes:-
*it has been already 20 years since Diablo 2, more than enough to change the whole look of the world.
* Stylish, giving Diablo 3 its own character and personality, allowing it to stand out from the crowd of brown and grey games, or 'realistic' (e.g. boring) looking games.
* Not monotonous. The use of inviting colours, contours, tones, vibrance, and animations are some of the game's major strengths. Makes the game accessible and playable for a long period of time.
* The use of colors allow for a wide variety of settings and locations, away from the mundane worlds of greys and browns.
* Vibrant colors and a wide variety of locations do not prohibit the game from having 'dark gothic' locations within the game. Diablo 2 consisted mainly of vibrant locations, but that didn't prevent the Durance of Hate from being a part of the game.
So to set things right i'll try to explain those changes and refute all the baseless nostalgia fueled claims that make no sense.
1-claim one They say Diablo 3 is cartoony and colorful Validtiy:nonsense, if Diablo 3 is cartoony then real life is loony toons, Diablo 1 and Diablo 2 were more much more colorful and cartoony than Diablo 3, which is 40 times more realistic than both of them.
Proofs:
-NATURE is VIVID and COLORFUL and that DOESN'T MAKE IT CARTOONY
IF THIS IS CARTOONY
THEN THIS IS A PIC FROM LOONY TOONS
-RAINBOWS are a freaking NATURAL phenomena, it has nothing to do with your freaking PONIES
Let's play find the ponie, what ?, there ain't any, OMG !!!!!
-Diablo 2 and Diablo 1 were very colorful and very cartoony ( STATED BY DIABLO DEV TEAM )
DIABLO 2 DISCO TIME
Still wonder which one is cartoony colorful and bright and which one is realistic, then maybe you should you go check your eyes at the nearest doctor.
Also D2 had normal daytime and VERY BRIGHT environments
IT WAS NOT ALL GLOOOMY AND DARK, you don't know what you are talking about and make yourselves look like 15 years old emo-Gothic girls how want every thing black and blotted with blood and gore, GET A LIFE.
2-claim two They say Diablo 3 looks like WoW Validtiy:Not true, Diablo 3 has a slightly stylish look that looks nothing like WoW, Team Fortress has a stylish look, does that mean it looks like WoW or Diablo 3, NO, and also in general not every fantasy stylized 3d game is WoW.
Proofs: This is the very stylish and low poly look of WoW, you can see it's textures and details are greatly lacking and that the colors are not coherent, both hands and feet are large and anatomy in general is exaggerated
THIS is DIABLO 3, the COLORS are COHERENT, the DETAILS are CRISP, the TEXTURES are RICH, the MOOD is CLEARLY SET, the CHARACTER SKIN is very detailed and the anatomy is only slightly stylized and looks closer to real life than anything before ( even in D1 and D2 )
NOT EVERY 3D stylized game is WOW, get real.
AND STYLISH = NOT BORING
( they stated that countless times but you call yourselves Blizz fans and keep ignoring that )
No Blizz true fan would Want D3 to look like every freaking generic 3d hack and slash clone out there, they are all NOT stylized and look like each other.
Can you even tell the difference between the first screen shot and the other two, for your surprise they are both two different games, yet they freaking look the same, do you know why ?
BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH FREAKING DARK AND BORING WITH NO MOOD OR AMBIENT COLORS, NO SANE DIABLO FAN WOULD WANT DIABLO 3 to look this GENERIC, BLAND AND SHITTY.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------////
3-claim three They say Diablo 3 Armor is spiky and large Validtiy:That's hilarious, did you even check how the armor wore by the Barbarian in D2 looked like, seriously !!!!!
Proofs:
The spiky armor above was in the game, and this Barbarian 3D model here was the one used for the 2D sprite in the Diablo 2 game as stated by the artist himself, so, that bland looking armor or this new more detailed and realistic one.
The Barbarian heavy armor designs always featured spikes and huge shoulder pieces, and simple as that, it looks a lot better now.
Warhammer universe also has very bulky armor and there is nothing cartoony about it, it is a gritty universe.
That's all for now
And remember i'm not the one how created the current look for Daiblo 3, it is BLIZZARD, the same company that made DIABLO 1 and DIABLO 2 that you keep whining about, THEY KNOW BETTER THAN YOU.
THEY HAD VERY GOOD REASONS FOR THEIR CHANGES, and ALL you WHINE about IS NOSTALGIA, DARKNESS AND BLOOD, quite an argument, an perfectly EMO one.
This has got to be one of the best posts I've seen on these forums since the unveiling of d3, my hat goes off to you for actually putting in the effort to say what so many people wanted to.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Is your concept of reality absolutely broken?
Have you ever had a flashlight in your hand when it was day outside? Have you ever been near a fire when in the day light?
Can you not even piece together that Act 1 is cloudy, hence the rain?
No, you can't.
I say you two fight it out.
"I find the new graphics insulting to the serious and foreboding setting of the plot and genre.
Its like dressing a marine up in a ballerina outfit and sending him into war.
PATHETIC!"
That's the main reason companies other than Blizzard ignore all this nonsense and make their games in secret to avoid such nonsense, and soon Blizzard too will do the same because of the attitude of mindless immature fans.
I have said countless time that Blizzard justified their changes in the game looks during their Art Panels in WWI, and it makes more sense than the mindless nostalgia fest going on here, anyone with even the slightest artistic sense could see how much hard work has been done on Diablo 3, so it is immature, implotie and rude to just ask them to change it all just because your nostlagia is hurting, if you don't like Diablo 3 as it is just don't buy it or play it, go play the countless gritty clones out there, or make your own company.
Reasons for the changes:-
*it has been already 20 years since Diablo 2, more than enough to change the whole look of the world.
* Stylish, giving Diablo 3 its own character and personality, allowing it to stand out from the crowd of brown and grey games, or 'realistic' (e.g. boring) looking games.
* Not monotonous. The use of inviting colours, contours, tones, vibrance, and animations are some of the game's major strengths. Makes the game accessible and playable for a long period of time.
* The use of colors allow for a wide variety of settings and locations, away from the mundane worlds of greys and browns.
* Vibrant colors and a wide variety of locations do not prohibit the game from having 'dark gothic' locations within the game. Diablo 2 consisted mainly of vibrant locations, but that didn't prevent the Durance of Hate from being a part of the game.
So to set things right i'll try to explain those changes and refute all the baseless nostalgia fueled claims that make no sense.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1-claim one
They say Diablo 3 is cartoony and colorful
Validtiy: nonsense, if Diablo 3 is cartoony then real life is loony toons, Diablo 1 and Diablo 2 were more much more colorful and cartoony than Diablo 3, which is 40 times more realistic than both of them.
Proofs:
-NATURE is VIVID and COLORFUL and that DOESN'T MAKE IT CARTOONY
IF THIS IS CARTOONY
THEN THIS IS A PIC FROM LOONY TOONS
-RAINBOWS are a freaking NATURAL phenomena, it has nothing to do with your freaking PONIES
Let's play find the ponie, what ?, there ain't any, OMG !!!!!
-Diablo 2 and Diablo 1 were very colorful and very cartoony ( STATED BY DIABLO DEV TEAM )
DIABLO 2 DISCO TIME
Still wonder which one is cartoony colorful and bright and which one is realistic, then maybe you should you go check your eyes at the nearest doctor.
Also D2 had normal daytime and VERY BRIGHT environments
IT WAS NOT ALL GLOOOMY AND DARK, you don't know what you are talking about and make yourselves look like 15 years old emo-Gothic girls how want every thing black and blotted with blood and gore, GET A LIFE.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------///
2-claim two
They say Diablo 3 looks like WoW
Validtiy: Not true, Diablo 3 has a slightly stylish look that looks nothing like WoW, Team Fortress has a stylish look, does that mean it looks like WoW or Diablo 3, NO, and also in general not every fantasy stylized 3d game is WoW.
Proofs:
This is the very stylish and low poly look of WoW, you can see it's textures and details are greatly lacking and that the colors are not coherent, both hands and feet are large and anatomy in general is exaggerated
THIS is DIABLO 3, the COLORS are COHERENT, the DETAILS are CRISP, the TEXTURES are RICH, the MOOD is CLEARLY SET, the CHARACTER SKIN is very detailed and the anatomy is only slightly stylized and looks closer to real life than anything before ( even in D1 and D2 )
NOT EVERY 3D stylized game is WOW, get real.
AND STYLISH = NOT BORING
( they stated that countless times but you call yourselves Blizz fans and keep ignoring that )
No Blizz true fan would Want D3 to look like every freaking generic 3d hack and slash clone out there, they are all NOT stylized and look like each other.
Can you even tell the difference between the first screen shot and the other two, for your surprise they are both two different games, yet they freaking look the same, do you know why ?
BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH FREAKING DARK AND BORING WITH NO MOOD OR AMBIENT COLORS, NO SANE DIABLO FAN WOULD WANT DIABLO 3 to look this GENERIC, BLAND AND SHITTY.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------////
3-claim three
They say Diablo 3 Armor is spiky and large
Validtiy: That's hilarious, did you even check how the armor wore by the Barbarian in D2 looked like, seriously !!!!!
Proofs:
The spiky armor above was in the game, and this Barbarian 3D model here was the one used for the 2D sprite in the Diablo 2 game as stated by the artist himself, so, that bland looking armor or this new more detailed and realistic one.
The Barbarian heavy armor designs always featured spikes and huge shoulder pieces, and simple as that, it looks a lot better now.
Warhammer universe also has very bulky armor and there is nothing cartoony about it, it is a gritty universe.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------////
That's all for now
And remember i'm not the one how created the current look for Daiblo 3, it is BLIZZARD, the same company that made DIABLO 1 and DIABLO 2 that you keep whining about, THEY KNOW BETTER THAN YOU.
THEY HAD VERY GOOD REASONS FOR THEIR CHANGES, and ALL you WHINE about IS NOSTALGIA, DARKNESS AND BLOOD, quite an argument, an perfectly EMO one.
Said the Barbarian before proceeding to slaughter everyone
http://www.petitiononline.com/d3color/petition.html
Watch, in a year, all of the whiners will be standing in line too buy it too LOL!!
And people will be talking about how Keeth Lee is the new Rob Pardo.
The more the nostalgia whiners whine the more rite you now you are.
Time for a history lesson.
1. Diablo was not made by Blizzard. Blizzard bought the company a month or two before the game was released.
2. Blizzard North, the company that changed its name after they were bought, left Blizzard a few years ago to go on to do two different things.
A. Some joined NCsoft.
B. The others made Hellgate: London.
3. Not a single dev that made Diablo 1 and 2 are working on Diablo 3. The only person that is still working for Blizzard is the lore guy. That's it.
Blizzard, currently, knows just about as well as I do about what makes a Diablo game a Diablo game. They've shared the exact same experiences that we have: They have played it.
To be more correct, Diablo (1) was developed by Condor. Condor was bought out by Blizzard 6 months before the rease, and was named Blizzard North. That's not much time for much change. Especially lore changes, and art changes. I doubt Chris Metzen, or Samwise had that much to do with the game.
I say: It has ONLY been 20 years since Diablo 2. Is that enough to change the whole look of the world? Did the extreme makeover crew rebuild the tristram cathedral? How much has our physical world changed since 1988... and we haven't been ravaged by demons. (or have we?)
And I guess you've never been to grass plains because they are pretty light green. In fact, they often have random flowers and thorn stuff. In Ukraine, at least.
This grass is fucking not trimmed: http://www.101fc.co.za/BhangaNeck/HiddenGrassland.JPG
Act I hardly had any tress.
Not enough to block out the light.
Learn your facts many many people rejoined blizzard... Also Blizzard north started Diablo 3 so you are made of fail.
Blizzard made the right choice... Diablo 2 was even more colorful when it first came out and they slowly patched it... what makes you think they won't do the same
I like it as is tho.
What matters is that no fans were involved at all at making Diablo 1 and Diablo 2, they were solely made by their Dev teams ( whoever they are ) and without anybody whining about it.
Not all people from Blizz north left Blizzard, some of them moved to Irvine.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
You would be a fool if you think that you know better than the current Dev art team, its their work and they analyzed diablo 1 and 2 more than you will ever do, watch the art panels, they weren't playing hockey during those 4 years.
Just get a life or a hobby and find something better to do than whining about a game that was announced just few days ago, accept the change and evolution of the game, it is a 3D game now, it is next-gen, it is stylized, it is different, a change the was clearly JUSTIFIED by the Devs.
Said the Barbarian before proceeding to slaughter everyone
http://www.petitiononline.com/d3color/petition.html
If we disappeared, most of the world would be dense wildlands again within 20 years.
Here is the link to the story.
| http://multiplayerblog.mtv.com/2008/07/02/diablo-iii-art-direction/ |
Comment, thoughts, responses appreciated.
This will probably be featured on todays AOTS as well, at time of writing the petition has 20,000 signatures.
Check Germany after WW2 directly and check Germany after 20 years from WW2, can you realize the difference that can happen in 20 years, seriously !!!?
Said the Barbarian before proceeding to slaughter everyone
http://www.petitiononline.com/d3color/petition.html
This has got to be one of the best posts I've seen on these forums since the unveiling of d3, my hat goes off to you for actually putting in the effort to say what so many people wanted to.