I really feel that Chaos should have got the 'Zha the mad' award. I just feel like it. Its too late though.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
''May the Gods give you the strength and power to bear the madness which flows through our minds.''
''Zubin, I've always imagined you as a crazy raver. The kinda guy that spends all night dancing to trance music while waving glow sticks and popping ecstasy.'' - Murderface
If you make posts like those. They will get deleted.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
''May the Gods give you the strength and power to bear the madness which flows through our minds.''
''Zubin, I've always imagined you as a crazy raver. The kinda guy that spends all night dancing to trance music while waving glow sticks and popping ecstasy.'' - Murderface
I have a suggestion that, if you mods aren't stubborn, will agree with and follow. It's simple, not genius, but no one else has said it. So...
Everyone likes flaming and off-topic in threads. But I do believe threads should be moderated of that stuff. If the thread is based on a specfic, then if people will off-topic and flame (which is off-topic), what's the point of the thread? Most likely the rest of the thread will be flaming and off-topic.
Saying this, I believe General should be moderated of spam, flame, off-topic, etc. But spam? Nope. Spam is nothingness, and there is no need to moderate nothingness. Mods who think spam needs to be moderated, get a hold of your damned selves.
So, my idea is that if people create discussion threads in General, that means they want no flaming or off-topic in it. BUT, if people don't care, they could create their discussion thread in spam, meaning that flaming and off-topic is allowed.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"Cards and flowers on your window, your friends all plead for you to stay,
sometimes beginnings aren't so simple, sometimes goodbye's the only way."
Saying this, I believe General should be moderated of spam, flame, off-topic, etc. But spam? Nope. Spam is nothingness, and there is no need to moderate nothingness. Mods who think spam needs to be moderated, get a hold of your damned selves.
Quite honestly, that made absolutely no sense. And to me that is flame, because you are directing an insult to a specific group of people (mods) without evidence.
IMO people don't WANT to go off-topic and spam. There is a spam sub forum, and an off-topic forum. Don't put your off topic waste in something important like SICK clan's forums. It's really not that hard; if you have something to say, put it in the correct thread. Even if it takes a little digging to find that 9 month old thread, (i know there are rules on necromancy, but if its not diablo 3 news or information i think it should be allowed) and post your opinions on the subject.
The Spam (Flood) Section is moderated 100% except it is not moderated for flood, and it is lightly moderated for offtopic. It is still moderated for flame and extreme offtopic, with the exception of the Spam (Flood) Thread, Tavern of Jay, and the Fight (Flame) Thread..
All other sections, including the Offtopic section, are moderated by flame, flood, offtopic, crossposting, multiposting, overquoting, restricted topics posting.
This will not change until the forum body votes against a particular rule, and since so far all votings included merely 10 or so people, such voting is nullified in favor of the neutrals who did not vote at all. Your singular opinion, chaosdragon, is only a fraction of the forum body, therefore, you must agree that we cannot make any decisions based on one forum member.
This will not change until the forum body votes against a particular rule, and since so far all votings included merely 10 or so people, such voting is nullified in favor of the neutrals who did not vote at all. Your singular opinion, chaosdragon, is only a fraction of the forum body, therefore, you must agree that we cannot make any decisions based on one forum member.
This will not change until the forum body votes against a particular rule, and since so far all votings included merely 10 or so people, such voting is nullified in favor of the neutrals who did not vote at all. Your singular opinion, chaosdragon, is only a fraction of the forum body, therefore, you must agree that we cannot make any decisions based on one forum member.
lol sounds like a robot or something
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Nut it up. Indubitably.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
''Zubin, I've always imagined you as a crazy raver. The kinda guy that spends all night dancing to trance music while waving glow sticks and popping ecstasy.'' - Murderface
At least we can try.
and who deleted my post?
''Zubin, I've always imagined you as a crazy raver. The kinda guy that spends all night dancing to trance music while waving glow sticks and popping ecstasy.'' - Murderface
along with this post.
and i guess every post in here.
Why not just delete the thread? and the sub forum?
(i swear to god if this gets deleted....)
But really, Elfen is one of the only members who doesnt post senseless bull.
Everyone likes flaming and off-topic in threads. But I do believe threads should be moderated of that stuff. If the thread is based on a specfic, then if people will off-topic and flame (which is off-topic), what's the point of the thread? Most likely the rest of the thread will be flaming and off-topic.
Saying this, I believe General should be moderated of spam, flame, off-topic, etc. But spam? Nope. Spam is nothingness, and there is no need to moderate nothingness. Mods who think spam needs to be moderated, get a hold of your damned selves.
So, my idea is that if people create discussion threads in General, that means they want no flaming or off-topic in it. BUT, if people don't care, they could create their discussion thread in spam, meaning that flaming and off-topic is allowed.
"Cards and flowers on your window, your friends all plead for you to stay,
sometimes beginnings aren't so simple, sometimes goodbye's the only way."
Quite honestly, that made absolutely no sense. And to me that is flame, because you are directing an insult to a specific group of people (mods) without evidence.
IMO people don't WANT to go off-topic and spam. There is a spam sub forum, and an off-topic forum. Don't put your off topic waste in something important like SICK clan's forums. It's really not that hard; if you have something to say, put it in the correct thread. Even if it takes a little digging to find that 9 month old thread, (i know there are rules on necromancy, but if its not diablo 3 news or information i think it should be allowed) and post your opinions on the subject.
The Spam (Flood) Section is moderated 100% except it is not moderated for flood, and it is lightly moderated for offtopic. It is still moderated for flame and extreme offtopic, with the exception of the Spam (Flood) Thread, Tavern of Jay, and the Fight (Flame) Thread..
All other sections, including the Offtopic section, are moderated by flame, flood, offtopic, crossposting, multiposting, overquoting, restricted topics posting.
This will not change until the forum body votes against a particular rule, and since so far all votings included merely 10 or so people, such voting is nullified in favor of the neutrals who did not vote at all. Your singular opinion, chaosdragon, is only a fraction of the forum body, therefore, you must agree that we cannot make any decisions based on one forum member.
Hmm I wonder why it happens all the time then? Agreed... everything should be moderated and have no spam/flame/flood except Spam forum...
"Cards and flowers on your window, your friends all plead for you to stay,
sometimes beginnings aren't so simple, sometimes goodbye's the only way."
lol sounds like a robot or something