And I'm not talking about a log in here or there. I mean coming back and playing some serious time. I arbitrarily set that at 10 hours. Feel free to raise that, just say why.
Personally, I'm interested in getting a view of how people expected to play Diablo 3. A lot of people seem put out of shape because they got bored after 50+ hours (oh wow, a game that didn't entertain past two days worth of play time).
I never expected to play constantly, as I would only play Diablo 2 every once a year or so. I'd play for a few weeks, and then I'd move on. I mean, did anyone really expect to be able to put in part time job hours in a one time pay game for 12 years straight (and if you did, why? I honestly don't understand that point of view)? Or are these people just talking out of their ass?
Diablo 1 & 2 was my first PC game that I have ever played on my first computer(iMac). Diablo 1 & 2 - was like the Zelda: Ocarina of Time, the Final Fantasy VII, the Super Smash Bro, the Counter Strike. I guess Diablo 3 - is like the Halo 3, the MW 3, the WoW expansions, the Fable 2 & 3. The point is that Diablo 3 is less great and more forgettable.
So, yea i enjoyed Diablo 2 long enough. Sadly not so much for Diablo 3
Diablo 1 & 2 was my first PC game that I have ever played on my first computer(iMac). Diablo 1 & 2 - was like the Zelda: Ocarina of Time, the Final Fantasy VII, the Super Smash Bro, the Counter Strike. I guess Diablo 3 - is like the Halo 3, the MW 3, the WoW expansions, the Fable 2 & 3. The point is that Diablo 3 is less great and more forgettable.
So, yea i enjoyed Diablo 2 long enough. Sadly not so much for Diablo 3
Yeah, but it's harder to make the third in a trilogy the best game. Just because for every change, there is going to be a loud minority that hates it, and a loud minority that loves it. But I guess it was a bit foolish to think it would ever have the same spot as Diablo 2, what with the playing for 12 years.
And I'm not talking about a log in here or there. I mean coming back and playing some serious time. I arbitrarily set that at 10 hours. Feel free to raise that, just say why.
Personally, I'm interested in getting a view of how people expected to play Diablo 3. A lot of people seem put out of shape because they got bored after 50+ hours (oh wow, a game that didn't entertain past two days worth of play time).
I never expected to play constantly, as I would only play Diablo 2 every once a year or so. I'd play for a few weeks, and then I'd move on. I mean, did anyone really expect to be able to put in part time job hours in a one time pay game for 12 years straight (and if you did, why? I honestly don't understand that point of view)? Or are these people just talking out of their ass?
So, yea i enjoyed Diablo 2 long enough. Sadly not so much for Diablo 3
Yeah, but it's harder to make the third in a trilogy the best game. Just because for every change, there is going to be a loud minority that hates it, and a loud minority that loves it. But I guess it was a bit foolish to think it would ever have the same spot as Diablo 2, what with the playing for 12 years.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gMAbNFptzAA