but you are not listening to our reasons!! Italofoca has a very good point... only girls have boobs, those things are the boobs hence diablo is a girl!!
(I'm just joking around here, I like the idea of a female Diablo, though I see how improbable is... about that monster in the OP... as I said before, too many maybes)
we still have NEVER seen blizzard confirmation that that is even the art of diablo. People say and claim they have yet noone has ever posted a BLIZZARD CONFIRMATION that this is the model. anyone coulda done that.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Nobody can go back and start a new beginning, but anyone can start today and make a new ending.
the statue does not look like that design! at all in my own opinion. and looking at it in the video its even got the mouth things on the shoulders, but that means zero. it could be a simple diablo-like demon or anyhting or even a scraped thing. Do you really think theyd show us diablo and we havent seen the majority of any importaant anythings yet?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Nobody can go back and start a new beginning, but anyone can start today and make a new ending.
they have just showed us the head and the boobs... now we are trying to figure out why the body looks so feminine... but that statue is confirmation enough, look it closely, it has the exact same horns!!
if your basing the accuracy of that on a statue that shows only the head awww dang, you must be right.
Because theyll let us see diablo when we hadnt seen at the time
-wizard
-monk
-5th class
-belial
-azmodan
or anything else important, think again, its absolutly senseless. PLUS your overlooking one thing, that WHOLE video was about making the VIDEOS which means that could easily be a completly BS body used just to be able to move the entire thing so neck up could be seen in the end of the video. its easier to move a complete object as a whole than it is to move just those parts and make it look right. it couldve simply been something used to make it easier for the release video.
where are you getting head and boobs? only thing seen that could ever be anything reminicent of diablo is the design of that skinny feminine looking thing (which is more than the head and "boobs") and then the statue. I am willing to say it he will nook nothing rmeinicent of that other than the head and shoulders, which ive said MATCH, thats all
and another thing, weve talked about possible abilities of "the lord of lies" and such were even possibly shapeshifting. we cant say that he cant become similar to diablo for all a player knows (never seeing him, or not seeing him in 20years). For all we know, diablo REALLY IS still traped in hell, maybe the lord of lies imitates him (but not BECOMES, imitates means similar and thusly not feminine) and makes us believe its diablo, and then he dissappears. everyone thinks "Weve got to go INTO hell and END diablo" then the lord of lies wins and is free of the greater evil.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Nobody can go back and start a new beginning, but anyone can start today and make a new ending.
ok... I watched the video again... the guy is talking about how easy is now to take a generci character and change the face and stuff like that...
maybe what we are looking there is a generic monster or whatever in wich they put the triune head to move it easier as dorge says...
about the triune being Diablo, I think it is... I don't care if big D is too important or whatever... in D1 diablo appears in the intro cinematics so it wouldn't be the first time... but I give you that it hasn't been 100% confirmed yet, though you can't deny it's possible at some extent...
I still like the female Diablo idea... (just a personal opinion)
a comparison between a movie and a game are completly unrelated, thats SUPPOSED to be in a movie, itss called a hook, itsz how you keep attention. they dont need to reveal diablo from the beginning to keep our attention, its obvious were here for the haul. and if you look right, the arm in your dig is massive, its more than it looks, dont make me do a paint on all the reasons that image and your sig dont even look alike apart from the face. it even appears like you cna see a spike off his back in yours.
amnd on the feamle diablo idea period, i brought tha tup ages ago and even related it to the past 2 diablos and said even for exmaple what if leah was a D host, and he had a more fem appearence, everyone shot me down.
they couldve used any body period just to create movement for the head area in the cinimatic, im taking college classes to WORK ON game programming, its very common. same idea as when they used a placeholder for the 4th/5th class whatever it was, it can be a placeholder body and the top part for it. For heavens sake, they even denied there possibly even BEING diablo in it. they said they ahdnt ev en confimed him to be in it (10000000000000000 / 1 he is anyway) after the trailer was released! theres a hundred different liklyhoods that that either isnt complete diablo, is a holder for production, is a scraped idea or so many other things.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Nobody can go back and start a new beginning, but anyone can start today and make a new ending.
what im saying is that first off the arm in your sig is significantly larger and that the thing that appears a spike is higher up in the sig appearing directly behind the arm almost.
and when and where did bashiok and whoever else confirm thats specifically him? thats what ive assked form the begginning first off. and second i also said that can very easily be a placeholder incomplete model. incasy you didnt notice when they were showing work on the legs, there significantly huge and the body is so small. heres an easier understanding... what theyre showing could be the first layer of many that havent been built up, another, itts like saying whats in the image is a stick figure that hasnt been turned into a character yet. i first asked for the proof of confirmation (show me them confriming it) and that still doesnt prove that is the final work, that could be the stick figure and the mass hasnt been done yet.
and heres another thing from a designers point of view. if that is wholely and completly diablo, theyd have to be next to completly done with story and ideals in aspect of that before doing the significant end pieces, they wait untill the VERY end to see what theyve done through the entire project and and see how far they can bring the whole thing.
Like saying theyve designed him as that, right now. then when there net to done with d3 as a whole, they see everything theyve done and know the 100% complete extent of their abilites with themselves, the tech and project as a whole, and would need to scrap him all together to implement there complete ability.
-------------------------------------------
development wise, theres two things game companies agree on, do the FIRST stage last because you know where you can bring it, (ex gears, god of war and many rpg action explorer type)
obviously they arent going that way because weve seen so much of act 1 already. the other second aspecct is, do the finale last because you know where you can bring it. so why would they cement FIRST what diablo is without knowing the extent theyre going to go on all of the game?
---------------------------------------------
and another add, support for the layer idea, look at how the breast is portrayed there or the "boob" many say. its a diff color! that is usually use din layering the structure. if that IS diablo, that is almost his skeletal structure to the most point with meat, organs, scally skin yet to be added, it wont look anything like that in the end and eont even be anywhere near as skinny and feminine
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Nobody can go back and start a new beginning, but anyone can start today and make a new ending.
development wise, theres two things game companies agree on, do the FIRST stage last because you know where you can bring it, (ex gears, god of war and many rpg action explorer type)
obviously they arent going that way because weve seen so much of act 1 already. the other second aspecct is, do the finale last because you know where you can bring it. so why would they cement FIRST what diablo is without knowing the extent theyre going to go on all of the game?
Two things game companies can agree on:
1) Do the first stage last, where you can "bring it."
2) Do the last stage last, where you can "bring it."
It isn't Belial. It's Diablo. This is clearly evident and your logic is taking weird paths.
lol For all of you that think those things on its (his or her's lol) chest looks like boobs have definitely never seen some before (no offense XD).. Those dont really look like breasts to me.. Most guys have more bigger (man-)boobs then that. lol
Edit: I dunno if what i just wrote was readable.. I don't have my glasses and I cant see shit XD
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
This body holding me, reminds me of my own mortality.
Embrace this moment. Remember... We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion.
I wasnt arguing it was belial, that was a question from somone else. and yea confirmation it waas the diablo head, but no confirmation that the image is anything more than diablos head on a placeholder.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Nobody can go back and start a new beginning, but anyone can start today and make a new ending.
Oh my god we are still discussing this over a year later!!! Pay attention to everything that is said immediately before that screen pops up. They start with a generic male body and add from there. He also talks about changing proportions, posture, etc.
That is 100% guaranteed Diablo. That was a very very early build before they had finished the model for the body. Look at the detail in the head compared to the detail in the arms, legs, etc. Then look at the detail in the trailer. They obviously weren't finished.
And yes, Diablo is in DIII, because of many many reasons. The obvious being the statue, the cinematic, and the game is called DIABLO III!!!
I SAID that dont YOU listen? I said it would be an EARLY one thaat wasnt BUILTY UP YET! why dont YOU try and read a little. thats what I said! we never said he wasnt in the game either, again read, we said that they teased and said they hadnt confirmed he was, we dont need no confirmation, we KNOW! it was a joke from them. You whole last post needs to be discredited because you ddint even read. try reading because everything you said, was said by me AND others. read.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Nobody can go back and start a new beginning, but anyone can start today and make a new ending.
I apologize. I only read the first page, and figured the second page was the same BS. Scyber tried to explain, then Seth stepped in, then Dauroth posted proof, but you all simply dismissed their points.
Ladies, Ladies please, stop fighting unless you're all gonna get naked and fight in gravy. Now, We all know that is Diablo in the trailer and we all know he isn't anywhere near finished yet.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Just as the Scorpion hunts...
Silently Lurking...
"Nothing is True. Everything is Permitted." ~ Ezio Auditore de Firenze
resistance is futile!!!
(I'm just joking around here, I like the idea of a female Diablo, though I see how improbable is... about that monster in the OP... as I said before, too many maybes)
diablo sounds like a little girl giggling next to that!!
Because theyll let us see diablo when we hadnt seen at the time
-wizard
-monk
-5th class
-belial
-azmodan
or anything else important, think again, its absolutly senseless. PLUS your overlooking one thing, that WHOLE video was about making the VIDEOS which means that could easily be a completly BS body used just to be able to move the entire thing so neck up could be seen in the end of the video. its easier to move a complete object as a whole than it is to move just those parts and make it look right. it couldve simply been something used to make it easier for the release video.
where are you getting head and boobs? only thing seen that could ever be anything reminicent of diablo is the design of that skinny feminine looking thing (which is more than the head and "boobs") and then the statue. I am willing to say it he will nook nothing rmeinicent of that other than the head and shoulders, which ive said MATCH, thats all
and another thing, weve talked about possible abilities of "the lord of lies" and such were even possibly shapeshifting. we cant say that he cant become similar to diablo for all a player knows (never seeing him, or not seeing him in 20years). For all we know, diablo REALLY IS still traped in hell, maybe the lord of lies imitates him (but not BECOMES, imitates means similar and thusly not feminine) and makes us believe its diablo, and then he dissappears. everyone thinks "Weve got to go INTO hell and END diablo" then the lord of lies wins and is free of the greater evil.
maybe what we are looking there is a generic monster or whatever in wich they put the triune head to move it easier as dorge says...
about the triune being Diablo, I think it is... I don't care if big D is too important or whatever... in D1 diablo appears in the intro cinematics so it wouldn't be the first time... but I give you that it hasn't been 100% confirmed yet, though you can't deny it's possible at some extent...
I still like the female Diablo idea... (just a personal opinion)
amnd on the feamle diablo idea period, i brought tha tup ages ago and even related it to the past 2 diablos and said even for exmaple what if leah was a D host, and he had a more fem appearence, everyone shot me down.
they couldve used any body period just to create movement for the head area in the cinimatic, im taking college classes to WORK ON game programming, its very common. same idea as when they used a placeholder for the 4th/5th class whatever it was, it can be a placeholder body and the top part for it. For heavens sake, they even denied there possibly even BEING diablo in it. they said they ahdnt ev en confimed him to be in it (10000000000000000 / 1 he is anyway) after the trailer was released! theres a hundred different liklyhoods that that either isnt complete diablo, is a holder for production, is a scraped idea or so many other things.
and when and where did bashiok and whoever else confirm thats specifically him? thats what ive assked form the begginning first off. and second i also said that can very easily be a placeholder incomplete model. incasy you didnt notice when they were showing work on the legs, there significantly huge and the body is so small. heres an easier understanding... what theyre showing could be the first layer of many that havent been built up, another, itts like saying whats in the image is a stick figure that hasnt been turned into a character yet. i first asked for the proof of confirmation (show me them confriming it) and that still doesnt prove that is the final work, that could be the stick figure and the mass hasnt been done yet.
and heres another thing from a designers point of view. if that is wholely and completly diablo, theyd have to be next to completly done with story and ideals in aspect of that before doing the significant end pieces, they wait untill the VERY end to see what theyve done through the entire project and and see how far they can bring the whole thing.
Like saying theyve designed him as that, right now. then when there net to done with d3 as a whole, they see everything theyve done and know the 100% complete extent of their abilites with themselves, the tech and project as a whole, and would need to scrap him all together to implement there complete ability.
-------------------------------------------
development wise, theres two things game companies agree on, do the FIRST stage last because you know where you can bring it, (ex gears, god of war and many rpg action explorer type)
obviously they arent going that way because weve seen so much of act 1 already. the other second aspecct is, do the finale last because you know where you can bring it. so why would they cement FIRST what diablo is without knowing the extent theyre going to go on all of the game?
---------------------------------------------
and another add, support for the layer idea, look at how the breast is portrayed there or the "boob" many say. its a diff color! that is usually use din layering the structure. if that IS diablo, that is almost his skeletal structure to the most point with meat, organs, scally skin yet to be added, it wont look anything like that in the end and eont even be anywhere near as skinny and feminine
Two things game companies can agree on:
1) Do the first stage last, where you can "bring it."
2) Do the last stage last, where you can "bring it."
It isn't Belial. It's Diablo. This is clearly evident and your logic is taking weird paths.
Edit: I dunno if what i just wrote was readable.. I don't have my glasses and I cant see shit XD
Embrace this moment. Remember...
We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion.
That is 100% guaranteed Diablo. That was a very very early build before they had finished the model for the body. Look at the detail in the head compared to the detail in the arms, legs, etc. Then look at the detail in the trailer. They obviously weren't finished.
And yes, Diablo is in DIII, because of many many reasons. The obvious being the statue, the cinematic, and the game is called DIABLO III!!!
/End thread pleeeeeease!!
This is where the discussion should probably continue.http://www.diablofans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9627&page=17
It still stands that this is a clone of the other thread Three-Headed Demon = Diablo? - Please keep all discussion regarding the demon here (that is the actual title BTW)
So shouldn't this thread still be closed?
I thought that was obvious...