The word Diablo isn't in the magazine one time. I don't think. I may have mmissed it but I doubt it.
It's good news if you think about it.
There are 2 options.
1. Diablo 3 is going to be announced at Blizzcon. Blizzard wouldn't allow them to announce it ahead of time. If they saw it and knew it was going to be announced at Blizzcon, they wouldn't deny it either as that would make them liars. Once you lie on purpose, you can never be trusted again as journalists. This is good news for us as it encourages the thought of D3's existance.
2. Diablo 3 isn't going to be announced at Blizzcon. PC Gamer surely would have brought the game up at some point if this were the case. Since they did not bring it up at all, this points back to option 1.
The word Diablo isn't in the magazine one time. I don't think. I may have mmissed it but I doubt it.
It's good news if you think about it.
There are 2 options.
1. Diablo 3 is going to be announced at Blizzcon. Blizzard wouldn't allow them to announce it ahead of time. If they saw it and knew it was going to be announced at Blizzcon, they wouldn't deny it either as that would make them liars. Once you lie on purpose, you can never be trusted again as journalists. This is good news for us as it encourages the thought of D3's existance.
2. Diablo 3 isn't going to be announced at Blizzcon. PC Gamer surely would have brought the game up at some point if this were the case. Since they did not bring it up at all, this points back to option 1.
Good news for us in my opinion.
Unless, as PC gamer stated, they never intended to do a D3 article at all. The cover was just a random fill-in....
They either
A wanted to hype up the magazine in hopes to gain more money
B actually didnt have the magazine finished but still wanted more money or
C actually had an atricle in their about D3 but blizz bitched
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
If you ever meet a hafling and a hungry dragon you dont have to outrun the dragon, you only have to outrun the hafling.
Hmm well..where exactly did the image of the magazine where it had the orange blurred text come from?
anyone know?
cus..I donno this is just a thought.
Maybe the magazine picture with the blurred orange text, was Photoshopped by some dickhead?
and PCgamer never did anything like that, and we were all fooled.
or im just stupid.
donno, just a thought.
i was the one who posted the thread here about the previous version of the cover, and my source is pcgamer's site itself. check my posts to see the original thread. they DID change it, and the new cover is right on blizzards website.
its because d3 will probably be at blizzcon and they once again want to be the ones to announce their own product. pcgamer knew about sc2 before hand so its not crazy to assume they know whats up with d3.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Vote:
http://www.diablofans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17929
hi *waves giant sword over his head while chasing goodguy*
A Fight You will Never want to miss!!!
Your ticket pays for the whole seat but you'll only need the edge!!!!!
Who will be victorious in this epic battle between Guy and Guy!!!!
Oh the Humanity!!!!!
RESERVE TICKETS NOW!!!!!!!
email Blades11c@yahoo.com for ticket information
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
It's good news if you think about it.
There are 2 options.
1. Diablo 3 is going to be announced at Blizzcon. Blizzard wouldn't allow them to announce it ahead of time. If they saw it and knew it was going to be announced at Blizzcon, they wouldn't deny it either as that would make them liars. Once you lie on purpose, you can never be trusted again as journalists. This is good news for us as it encourages the thought of D3's existance.
2. Diablo 3 isn't going to be announced at Blizzcon. PC Gamer surely would have brought the game up at some point if this were the case. Since they did not bring it up at all, this points back to option 1.
Good news for us in my opinion.
Vote:
http://www.diablofans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17929
Unless, as PC gamer stated, they never intended to do a D3 article at all. The cover was just a random fill-in....
http://www.pcgamer.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=24788
So the "change" could mean absolutely nothing in regards to Blizzcon...
Yeah I read that the first time you posted that. It being ignored wasn't an accident so stop posting it.
Vote:
http://www.diablofans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17929
How about you quit being an ass already
You post what you want, I'll post what I want. If you dont like it dont read it.
Hahahaha. Get offended much?
Vote:
http://www.diablofans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17929
A wanted to hype up the magazine in hopes to gain more money
B actually didnt have the magazine finished but still wanted more money or
C actually had an atricle in their about D3 but blizz bitched
anyone know?
cus..I donno this is just a thought.
Maybe the magazine picture with the blurred orange text, was Photoshopped by some dickhead?
and PCgamer never did anything like that, and we were all fooled.
or im just stupid.
donno, just a thought.
Vote:
http://www.diablofans.com/forums/showthread.php?t=17929
i was the one who posted the thread here about the previous version of the cover, and my source is pcgamer's site itself. check my posts to see the original thread. they DID change it, and the new cover is right on blizzards website.
its because d3 will probably be at blizzcon and they once again want to be the ones to announce their own product. pcgamer knew about sc2 before hand so its not crazy to assume they know whats up with d3.